Toby Westerman Can’t, or Won’t, See the Forest for the Trees!

l

A Sad Example of a Supposedly Alternative Kremlinologist Who – even Now! – Refuses to Take into Account Any Continued Existence Whatsoever of a Communist Grand Design Aimed – still! – at Total Control over the Whole World. Instead, He Personalises (as if It Was All about Putin and Not about the Same Old World Revolutionary Steam Locomotive), and Adds Up Fact after Fact, Claiming to Be “Connecting the Dots”, Which Finally He Isn’t, as He Lacks – or Dismisses – the Indispensable Frame of Reference Necessary for Putting 2 and 2 together, Meaning a Solid Understanding – and Acknowledgment! – of Communist Longterm Deception Strategy as Laid out by Premier Soviet Defector Anatoliy Golitsyn. 

 

 I still just see a bunch of trees

l

l

l

l

IN LIEU OF AN INTRODUCTION

l

“Subtle! Subtle! / They become formless. / Mysterious! Mysterious! / They become soundless. / Therefore, they are the masters of the enemy’s fate.

Sun Tzu, 6th century B.C.: “The Art of War”

l

“No parliament can in any circumstances be for Communists an arena of struggle for reforms… The only question can be that of utilising bourgeois state institutions for their own destruction.”

Lenin *

l

“Our only strategy at present is to become stronger and, therefore, wiser, more reasonable, more opportunistic. The more opportunistic, the sooner will you again assemble the masses around you. When we have won over the masses by our reasonable approach, we shall then apply offensive tactics in the strictest sense of the word.

Lenin *

l

“The withering away of the state, the precondition for the classless society, could not be entertained as a possibility until the encirclement of socialism by capitalism had been changed to the encirclement of capitalism by socialism. That is to say, until those conditions had been established which would assure world-wide Soviet domination.”

Stalin, 1939 *

l

“The point is that the Communist goal is fixed and changeless – it never varies one iota from their objective of world domination, but if we judge them only by the direction in which they seem to be going, we shall be deceived.”

Yelena Bonner, wife of Soviet nuclear physicist and leading figure of the controlled “dissident movement”, Andrei Sakharov *                                                                                                                           

l

“Capitalism’s short-term view can never envisage the lengths across which we can plan.”

Lavrentii Beria, early 1950s *

l

There is no wall between socialism and Communism. These are not two divergent types of society, but merely two phases of one and the same social formation, distinguished the one from the other by the degree of their maturity. The transition from socialism to Communism consequently constitutes a gradual process. Communism grows up out of socialism as its direct prolongation. In the very bosom of socialist society its germs and roots spring up. These shoots of the future, developing on socialist soil, will lead… to a consolidation of Communism. Naturally, the entry into a higher phase of the new society cannot be pinned down to a specific calendar date, but it will be accomplished without abrupt change.” – “From the fact that the transition from socialism to Communism will take place by degrees, it does not follow that this is a slow process. On the contrary, the transition is distinguished by a particularly high rate of development in all areas of social life… ending with the uplift of the culture and the conscious awareness of people.”

“Fundamentals of Marxism-Leninism”, 1960 *

l

“Unlike in present United States, there will be no place for dissent in future Marxist-Leninist America. Here you can get popular like Daniel Ellsberg and filthy rich like Jane Fonda for being ‘dissident’, for criticising your Pentagon. In future, these people will be simply squashed like cock-croaches; nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful, noble ideas of equality! This they don’t understand, and it will be greatest shock for them, of course. The demoralisation process in the United States is basically complete already. For the last 25 years – actually, it’s overfulfilled because demoralisation now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans, thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter any more. A person who was demoralised, is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it – until he is going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When the military-boot crashes his balls, then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragic of the situation of demoralisation.”

Soviet defector of 1970, Yuri Bezmenov, 1984 (interview conducted by G. Edward Griffin; therein: minutes 1:12:20 till 1:14:02)

l

“Gentlemen, Comrades, do not be concerned about all that you hear about ‘glasnost’ and ‘perestroika’ and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant change within the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans, and to let them fall asleep.

Mikhail Gorbachev, early in his tenure, speaking before the Politburo *

l

The Party has made “specific decisions on how to update our political system”. – “Thus we shall give a fresh impetus to our revolutionary restructuring. We shall maintain our quiet [i.e. Leninist] creativity and daring in an efficient and responsible fashion in a Leninist Bolshevik manner.”

Mikhail Gorbachev, speaking at the 27th CPSU Congress, March 1986 *

l

“Adopting a bold, realistic, mobilising and inspiring strategy, one that is Leninist in spirit, the struggle for the triumph of Communist ideals, of peace and progress, the 27th Congress of the CPSU expresses the Party’s firm determination to honourably follow our great road, and open up new vistas for the creative energy and revolutionary initiative of the… people’s intelligentsia. The Congress calls on all Soviet people to dedicate all their strength, knowledge, ability, and creative enthusiasm to the great goals of Communist construction, and to worthily continue Lenin’s victorious revolutionary cause, the cause of the October Revolution!”

Mikhail Gorbachev, closing address to the 27th CPSU Congress, March 6, 1986 *

l

“Perestroika is a revolutionary process for it is a leap forward in the development of socialism, in the realisation of its crucial characteristics.”

Mikhail Gorbachev: ‘Perestroika’, 1987

l

“What is meant [by the term ‘revolution from above’] is profound and essentially revolutionary changes implemented on the initiative of the authorities themselves but necessitated by objective changes in the situation. It may seem that our current perestroika could be called ‘revolution from above’. True, the perestroika drive started on the Communist Party’s initiative, and the Party leads it. I spoke frankly about it at the meeting with Party activists in Khabarovsk [already!!!] in the summer of 1986. We began at the top of the pyramid and went down to its base, as it were. Yes, the Party leadership started it. The highest Party and state bodies elaborated and adopted the program. True, perestroika is not a spontaneous but a governed process.

Mikhail Gorbachev: ‘Perestroika’, 1987

l

“We openly confess that we refuse the hegemonial endeavours and globalist claims of the United States. We are not pleased by some aspects of American policy and of the American Way of Life. But we respect the right of the American people, just as the right of all other peoples, to live along its own rules and laws, its own morals and inclinations.”

Mikhail Gorbachev: ‘Perestroika’, 1987

l

“Those who hope that we shall move away from the socialist path will be greatly disappointed.”

Mikhail Gorbachev: ‘Perestroika’, 1987 *

l

“We are moving towards a new world, the world of Communism. We shall never turn off that road.”

Mikhail Gorbachev, 1987 *

l

“We see that confusion has arisen in some people’s minds: aren’t we retreating from the positions of socialism, especially when we introduce new and unaccustomed forms of economic management and public life, and aren’t we subjecting the Marxist-Leninist teaching itself to revision? … No, we are not retreating a single step from socialism, from Marxism-Leninism…

Mikhail Gorbachev, 1988 * 

l

“The image of the enemy that is being eroded has been … absolutely vital for the foreign and military policy of the United States and its allies. The destruction of this stereotype … is Gorbachev’s weapon.

Georgi Arbatov, 1988 *

l

We are for a Lenin who is alive! In building our future we are basing ourselves upon the gigantic intellectual and moral potential of the socialist idea linked with the theory of Marxism-Leninism. We see no rational grounds to give up the spiritual [sic!!!] richness contained in Marxism. Through restructuring [i.e. ‘perestroika’], we want to give socialism a second wind and unveil in all its plenitude [meaning: globally!] the vast humanist potential of the socialist system.” – “In order to achieve this, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union returns to the origins and principles of the Bolshevik Revolution, to the Leninist ideas about the construction of a new society… Our Party was and remains the Party of Lenin… In short, we are for a Lenin who is alive.” – “We must seek these answers guided by the spirit of Leninism, the style of Lenin’s thinking, and the method of dialectical cognition.

Mikhail Gorbachev, speaking to a group of Russian students, Nov. 15, 1989 *

l

“In a democratic state, a changeover to a multiparty system is inevitable. Various political parties are gradually being formed [out of the CPSU] in our country. At the same time, a fundamental renewal of the CPSU is inevitable… First, it is necessary to organisationally codify all the platforms that exist in the CPSU and to give every Communist time for political self-determination The Party should divest itself of all state functions. A parliamentary-type Party will emerge. Only this kind of Party, provided that there is a mighty renewal [of the CPSU]… will be able to be a leading Party and to win elections for one or another of its factions. With the development of democratic movements in the country and the further radicalisation of restructuring, it will be possible for this alliance to become the vanguard of society in actual fact. This will provide a broad social base for the renewal of society … [and to] erect a barrier against attacks by the conseratives, and guarantee the irreversibility of restructuring.”

Boris Yeltsin, speaking at the 28th CPSU Congress on July 6, 1990 *

l

“Now, about the Party itself. Allow me to formulate three conditions necessary for the Party to fully demonstrate its viability and actually attain its vanguard potential. In the first place, to this end it must, resolutely and without delay, restructure all its work and reorganise all its structures on the basis of the new Statutes and the Congress’s Programme Statement, so that under the new conditions, it can effectively perform its role as the vanguard party. We must do everything to firmly establish in the CPSU the power of the Party masses behind an all-encompassing democracy, comradeship, openness, glasnost and criticism. Secondly, when there are various views and even platforms on a number of questions of policy and practical activity, the majority must have respect for the minority. And thirdly, Comrades, we must study, learn, and improve our culture. If we embark on this path, it will be easier to interact and have contacts with other forces. The Central Committee and I will do all we can to help the Republic Communist Parties gain their new independent status as soon as possible, a status that will lead not to a fragmentation of Communists and nations but to a new internationalist unity of the CPSU on a common ideological basis. Let us prove that the CPSU, as it restructures itself, is capable of living up to these expectations… and then it will become a truly vanguard party whose power lies not in giving orders but in influencing people.”

Mikhail Gorbachev, speaking to the 28th CPSU Congress, July 13, 1990 *

l

“He [Gorbachev] isn’t a Leninist any more.” – “I don’t think we have been deceived; at least, I hope we haven’t.”

Margaret Thatcher, July 1991, in a personal conversation with Christopher Story *

l

Gorbachev’s ‘Perestroika’ was exactly modelled after Lenin’s ‘New Economic Policy’ of the 1920s. And the West fell for the same lies TWICE:

“GORBACHEV OFFERS PARTY A CHARTER THAT DROPS ICONS – HARD-LINERS CRITICIZED – Opening a 2-Day Meeting, He Challenges Even Sanctity of Marxism-Leninism” (Headline of The New York Times, July 26, 1991) *

“LENIN ABANDONS STATE OWNERSHIP AS SOVIET POLICY – Official Decree Retains Control of Only a Few of the Big National Industries – TO LEASE TO INDIVIDUALS – Payments for Postal, Railroads and Other Public Services Are Re-established” (Headline of The New York Times, August 13, 1921) *

l

“I think that the idea of a Common European Home, the building of a united Europe, and I would like to underline today, of Great Europe, the building of Great Europe, great, united Europe, from the Atlantic to the Urals, from the Atlantic to Vladivostok, including all our territory, most probably a European-American space, a united humanitarian space: this project is inevitable. I am sure that we will come to building a united military space, as well. To say more precisely: we will build a united Europe, whose security will be based on the principles of collective security. Precisely, collective security.”

Soviet foreign secretary of the day, Eduard Shevardnadze, on November 19, 1991, interviewed on a Moscow television programme along with NATO Secretary General of the day, Lord Robertson *

l

“Our vision of the European space from the Atlantic to the Urals is not that of a closed system. Since it includes the Soviet Union, which reaches to the shores of the Pacific, it goes beyond nominal geographical boundaries.”

Mikhail Gorbachev in his prepared Nobel Peace Prize speech in Oslo in June 1992, when the Soviet Union had already been ‘disbanded’ by him half a year earlier!!! *

l

“I dare say that the European process has already acquired elements of irreversibility. In such a context, in the process of creating a new Europeself-determination of sovereign nations will be realised in a completely different manner.

Mikhail Gorbachev, in the same speech in June 1992; nota bene: speaking for the Yeltsin regime to which, allegedly, he was in opposition! *

l

“There was a brilliantly planned and executed, large-scale, unprecedented provocation in which the roles were scripted for the intelligent and the stupid, all of whom consciously or unconsciously played their parts.”

Lt-General Aleksandr Lebed, commenting in retrospect three years after, on the fake August coup of August 1991, as was published by ITAR-TASS on August 19, 1994 *

l

“One thing, I think, needs to be said here: And that is that the KGB and the GRU, Soviet intelligence, cannot exist without the Communist Party. The Communist Party and the KGB share the same bloodstream. They are the same entity. This was made clear by the head of the KGB, Alexander Shelepin, in 1961, when he made a very important speech, pointing out that the Party lives inside the structures of the KGB, and the KGB lives inside the Party. Now, I want to emphasise that at the outset because a number of books have appeared recently, suggesting the thesis that, you know, the Party disappeared, Communism died, the Soviet Union collapsed, but for some reason the KGB and the “Organs”, as they call it, continued.” – “The simile that I like to use, you know, is: the dog, the front of the dog, the head and the front legs fell off, and the back legs of the dog carry on walking. This is of course absolutely absurd!”

Christopher Story, 1995 (interview conducted by Bill McIlhaney; therein: minutes 3:41 till 7:28)

l

“They write that I am the mafia’s godfather. [But] it was Vladimir Lenin who was the real organiser of the mafia and who set up the criminal state.

Otari Kvantrishvili, a Georgian mafia ‘leader’, who was later murdered; published in April 1994 in Komsomolskaya Pravda. *

l

“One tries to make Westerners believe that the mafiya is the product of post-Communism, whereas in reality it is organised, controlled and staffed by the KGB.

Algirdas Katkus, then Vice-President of ‘newly independent’ Lithuania in an interview for the French publication Libre Journal: ‘Un pays sacrifie’; Number 26, page 29; Paris 1995 *

l

“The collective security model… should pave the way for a gradual evolutionary synthesis of several processes: integration within the CIS and the EU, strengthening and increasing the role of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, transforming NATO [and] working together to prevent or resolve conflicts.”

Yuriy Ushakov, Director of the Directorate for European Cooperation at the Russian Foreign Ministry, in International Affairs, Vol. 4, #5 (1995): ‘Europe: Towards a New Security Model’ * 

l

“Russian membership of the Council of Europe will open up intensified new cooperation between Russia and Europe and will assist us in reaching our objectives of achieving membership of the European Union and of NATO.

Then Russian Foreign Minister, Andrei Kozyrev, after Russia’s admission to the Council of Europe by February 8, 1996

l

Vladimir Zhirinovskiy is “just the probe they use to measure the depth of dissatisfaction in Russia.” [But Zhirinovskiy also acts as a ‘probe’ to test whether Soviet strategy has possibly been understood by Western observers, which to the satisfaction of the strategists just never happens to be the case: the West continues to be sound asleep.]

Mikhail Poltoranin, then head of the ‘Federal Information Centre’, Jan. 13, 1994, ITAR-TASS * 

l

Vladimir Zhirinovskiy also did his work well. He was in good shape and did his best to show everybody present [at the Council of Europe, in Strasbourg] what a wild and horrible person he is. Russia, he said, is the most democratic state in the world, unlike any member of the Council of Europe – for instance, the Germans, who are harming the Turks, the Turks who are suppressing the Kurds, and so on. Having succeeded in frightening the gentle Europeans [indicating how much the Leninists despise the compliant European ‘useful idiots’; Christopher Story] he concluded by saying that he personally would be happy if Russia were refused admission – as, in that case, he (Zhirinovskiy) would win the Presidential elections by a still larger margin.” [This is how the Soviets dialectically make the West call for what the Soviets want: In this case, ‘Yeltsin must be supported so to prevent a dictator Zhirinovskiy’, and money kept flowing …] 

Vladimir Lukin, formerly Russia’s Ambassador to the United States and Chairmain of the State Duma Committee of Foreign Affairs: International Affairs, Volume 42, Number 2, 1996: “Russia’s Entry to the Council of Europe” * 

l

“Ukrainian Comrades [should] not be involved in political infighting in their country [but] strengthen their ranks [and] set up primary organisations based on the CPSU platform [!!!].” – “The most powerful branches of the Union of USSR Officers operate in the units of the 43rd Missile Army, in Crimea, Dnepropetrovsk, Odessa, Kharkov, and Kiev.”

From a 1996 secret resolution addressing the work in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, published on March 19, 1996 (more than 4 years after the alleged dissolution of the USSR!!!!!) by the US Foreign Broadcast Information Service, FBIS: FBIS-SOV-96-054; page 44 *

(Quotes marked with ‘*’ are all taken from Christopher Story’s book, “The European Union Collective”)

l

l

MADNESS AND SHEER STUPIDITY HAVE BECOME THE NEW NORMAL

It is quite amazing – and frightening – to see how, these days, intellectual discernment & sincerity have come down to virtually zero. Not that we could afford such laxness, opportunism, or plain incompetence in a time when the fate and destiny of the whole of humankind is at stake. We can’t. Yet, as Moscow and Beijing are now gearing up their joint efforts towards a new world unified under communism, not only the Pravdaesque mainstream media in the West, but even supposedly staunch conservatives and alternative columnists appear to be firmly immune, still, against the hard realities right in front of their noses. The “spectre of communism” has never left the scene, the USSR was never dissolved but simply relabelled, and yet these “useful idiots” (Lenin’s phrase) keep parrotting Soviet disinformation, some of them even praising the unchanged Evil Empire as the future centre of gravity of a renewed Christian civilisation. Can madness get any more absurd than that?

If one reads premier communist defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, one can see how skilled the Soviet apparat always has been and still is in planting in the Western mind false hopes and illusory expectations. As a consequence, the fictitious dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and of the Soviet Union itself was naïvely hailed by the West as the dawning of a new, democratic era throughout the world, worse: the West was convinced it had won the Cold War! In reality, however, this greatest deception operation in the history of mankind simply removed from the sleepy Western eyes the image of the enemy, and the image only, opening up formerly unthinkable new prospects for the communist bloc to modernise and solidify its economies and militaries. Tragically, whilst Russia and China were growing stronger and stronger, the West, disabled to see reality for what it was, was missing out on the ever more imminent threat to its very existence.

Deception has never ceased to be at the heart of everything the communist bloc does and never will, but there has taken place recently an alarming change in rhetoric and action on the part of Moscow and Beijing that can only be characterised as a seismic shift, at least in terms of appearance, for all that really happened was that the communists are now moving on, in their revolutionary strategy, from projecting weakness and internal division (the latter a.k.a. the “scissors strategy”) and from allegedly seeking good and friendly relations with the West to an open display of their actual strength and unity as well as their unchanged hostile revolutionary intentions. Anatoliy Golitsyn perfectly foresaw our present situation, that isn’t even recognised by most today, on page 328 of his 1984 book, New Lies for Old (bold print by this author):

“Before long, the communist strategists might be persuaded that the balance had swung irreversibly in their favor. In that event they might well decide on a Sino-Soviet “reconciliation.” The scissors strategy would give way to the strategy of “one clenched fist.” At that point the shift in the political and military balance would be plain for all to see. Convergence would not be between two equal parties, but would be on terms dictated by the communist bloc. The argument for accommodation with the overwhelming strength of communism would be virtually unanswerable. Pressures would build up for changes in the American political and economic system on the lines indicated in Sakharov’s treatise. Traditional conservatives would be isolated and driven toward extremism. They might become the victims of a new McCarthyism of the left. The Soviet dissidents who are now extolled as heroes of the resistance to Soviet communism would play an active part in arguing for convergence. Their present supporters would be confronted with a choice of forsaking their idols or acknowledging the legitimacy of the new Soviet regime.” – “There might even be public acknowledgement that the splits and disputes were long-term disinformation operations that had successfully deceived the “imperialist” powers. The effect on Western morale can be imagined. In the new worldwide communist federation the present different brands of communism would disappear, to be replaced by a uniform, rigorous brand of Leninism. The process would be painful. Concession made in the name of economic and political reform would be withdrawn. Religious and intellectual dissent would be suppressed. Nationalism and all other forms of genuine opposition would be crushed. Those who had taken advantage of détente to establish friendly Western contacts would be rebuked or persecuted like those Soviet officers who worked with the allies during the Second World War. In new communist states – for example, in France, Italy, and the Third World – the “alienated classes” would be reeducated. Show trials of “imperialist agents” would be staged. Action would be taken against nationalist and social democratic leaders, party activists, former civil servants, officers, and priests. The last vestiges of private enterprise and ownership would be obliterated. Nationalization of industry, finance, and agriculture would be completed. In fact, all the totalitarian features familiar from the early stages of the Soviet revolution and the postwar Stalinist years in Eastern Europe might be expected to reappear, especially in those countries newly won for communism. Unchallenged and unchallengeable, a true communist monolith would dominate the world.

l

THE HORRIFYING STATE OF AFFAIRS TODAY

Dear reader, we have now reached exactly there! Golitsyn was right. He didn’t want to be right, as his reason to defect in the first place was to try and warn, and eventually save the West from the impending danger. Sadly – by a mixture of communist infiltration and systemic arrogance, we can assume – his top-notch assessments were dismissed by the majority in American intelligence, and, just as Golitsyn had also predicted, a number of false defectors (Yuri Nosenko as the most prominent) soon followed him and succeeded in getting him branded as unstable and paranoid. But Golitsyn’s first book, New Lies for Old, published in1984, isn’t the manic rage of a paranoid madman, but a thorough, scholarly work for readers with the necessary background in political science and strategy. And here is how Golitsyn most meticulously explained his dilemma in the closing part of the foreword to his second book of 1995, The Perestroika Deception: The World’s Slide Towards the Second October Revolution – Memoranda to the Central Intelligence Agency; Edward Harle Ltd., London-New York (bold print by this author): 

“[…] Since the Central Intelligence Agency did not react to my Memoranda, I decided to publish them and asked the CIA to declassify them for the purpose. The Agency agreed. Several considerations forced me to take my decision.

First, the democracies of the United States and Western Europe are facing a dangerous situation and are vulnerable because their governments, the Vatican, the elite, the media, the industrialists, the financiers, the trade unions and, most important, the general public are blind to the dangers of the strategy of ‘perestroika’ and have failed to perceive the deployment of the Communist political potential of the renewed ‘democratic’ regimes against the West. The democracies could perish unless they are informed about the aggressive design of ‘perestroika’ against them.

Secondly, I could not imagine that American policymakers, and particularly the conservatives in both the Republican and Democratic parties, despite their long experience with Communist treachery, would not be able to grasp the new manoeuvres of the Communist strategists and would rush to commit the West to helping ‘perestroika’ which is so contrary to their interests.

It has been sad to observe the jubilation of American and West European conservatives who have been cheering ‘perestroika’ without realising that it is intended to bring about their own political and physical demise. Liberal support for ‘perestroika’ is understandable, but conservative support came as a surprise to me.

Thirdly, I was appalled that ‘perestroika’ was embraced and supported by the United States without any serious debate on the subject.

In the fourth place, I am appalled by the failure of American scholars to point out the relevance of Lenin’s New Economic Policy to understanding the aggressive, anti-Western design of ‘perestroika’ or to provide appropriate warning to policymakers, and their failure to distinguish between America’s true friends and its Leninist foes precisely because these foes are wearing the new ‘democratic’ uniform. Given the pressures they face, policymakers have no time to study the history of the period of Lenin’s New Economic Policy, or to remind themselves of Marxist-Leninist dialectics.

But how could such learned and distinguished scholars as S. Bilar and Z. Brzezinski have failed to warn them about the successes of the New Economic Policy, the mistakes made by the West in accepting it and Gorbachev’s repetition of Lenin’s strategy and its dangers for the West? What happened to their credentials as great scholars? Why was it left to Professor Norman Stone of Oxford University to detect and make the parallel in his article in the London ‘Daily Telegraph’ of 11th November 1989, and to express concern at the euphoria over Gorbachev? In his book, ‘The Grand Failure’, Brzezinski limited his description of Lenin’s New Economic Policy to three brief phases. He described the New Economic Policy as amounting to a reliance on the market mechanism and private initiative to stimulate economic recovery. In his words, it was probably ‘the most open and intellectually innovative phase’ in Soviet history.

For Brzezinski, the NEP is ‘a shorthand term for a period of experimentation, flexibility and moderation’ [see ‘The Grand Failure’, Charles Scribner and Sons, New York 1989, pages 18-19]. I am appalled by Brzezinski’s failure to explain the relevance of Lenin’s New Economic Policy to ‘perestroika’.

This failure is further illustrated by the following:

(a) S. Bialer, a former defector from the Central Committee apparatus of the Polish Communist Party, wrote a foreword to Gorbachev’s book, ‘Perestroika’, introducing it to the US public without inserting any warning about the parallel with the New Economic Policy and its dangers for the Western democracies.

(b) During his recent visit to Moscow, Z. Brzezinski, the former National Security Adviser in the Carter Administration, met leading Soviet strategists including Yakovlev, an expert on the manipulation of the Western media, and advised them on how to proceed with ‘perestroika’. Furthermore, Brzezinski delivered a lecture on the same subject to the Soviet diplomats at the High Diplomatic Academy!

In the fifth place, I am disappointed that Gordievsky, a recent KGB defector, did not help much to explain ‘perestroika’ as the final phase of Soviet long-range strategy, to describe its essence or to point out the deceptive nature of the changes and the strategic danger for the West. Gordievsky’s articles in ‘The Times’ of London of 27-28 February and 1 March 1990, contained a rather optimistic, if not laudatory, description of the ‘reforms’ initiated under Gorbachev and Yakovlev. I am puzzled that he should write so enthusiastically about them in the London ‘Times’. He might as well have published his comments in the Party newspaper ‘Pravda’ or in Korotich’s ‘Ogonek’. His assessment of ‘perestroika’ and its meaning for the West is in complete contradiction to that set out in my Memoranda to the Central Intelligence Agency. Further comment would be superfluous. I leave it to the reader to make his own judgment.

In the sixth place, misguided Western support for ‘perestroika’ at all levels, and especially among the Western media, is destabilising Western societies, their defence, their political processes and their alliances. It is immensely accelerating the successful execution of the Soviet strategic design against the West. In 1984 I thought that, in the event of Western resistance to Soviet strategy, the scenario of convergence between the two systems might take the next half century [see New Lies for Old, pages 365-6].

Now, however, because the West has committed itself to the support of ‘perestroika’ and because of the impact of the misguided and euphoric support for it in the Western media, convergence might take less than a decade. The sword of Damocles is hanging over the Western democracies, yet they are oblivious to it. I believe in truth and the power of ideas to convey the truth.

Therefore, I present my Memoranda to the public – convinced that they will help them to see the ‘perestroika’ changes, and their sequels, in the Communist world and beyond, in a more realistic light, and to recover from their blindness.

Anatoliy Golitsyn, United States, 1995″

l

THE CONTINUING COLLECTIVE DEEP SLEEP OF THE WEST

It is entirely incomprehensible, given the (well-timed) renewed aggressiveness and threats from this now openly displayed Moscow-Beijing communist alliance, that supposed analysts and commentators stubbornly keep rationalising things to the effect that either “Russia” has a right to defend itself; just happens to be ruled by a bunch of power-ridden oligarchs who want the USSR back; should be applauded for showing strength and traditional Russian self-esteem; or whatever more outlandish distortions of reality are in circulation. Yet, what we are facing is the final mobilisation of the whole of the communist bloc towards slaying the West! Therefore the most unfriendly language, therefore all the military moves.

Because of this deplorable inaptitude across the board, because of these laughable non-assessments one can read everywhere (the shameful example to be introduced here being supposed political analyst Toby Westerman), this author sat down in late August 2013 and mailed a little reader’s comment to the traditional-Catholic website traditioninaction.org, where same Toby Westerman appears to be in the position of regular house Kremlinologist, so to speak (that comment by this author was then posted by TIA in their “What People Are Commenting” section on August 29, 2013):

 

Dear Mr. Guimarães,

With all due respect, after having read your contributor Toby Westerman’s articles on Russia and China for quite some time, I’ve come to the conclusion that although he desperately tries to figure out the writing on the wall, still he cannot identify WHY the “new Russia” so fatally resembles the old Soviet Union.

For, had he ever read – let alone: grasped – the two books by outstanding Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, New Lies for Old (1984) and The Perestroika Deception (1995), as well as the late Christopher Story’s reference work, The European Union Collective (2002), he certainly would stop parroting the official Soviet line of deception of a “fall” of the USSR back in 1991.

The shocking reality – according to Golitsyn and Story and very easy to realise as soon as one really opens one’s eyes – is that there has been NO discontinuity in the Soviet/pan-communist project of Marxist-Leninist world revolution whatsoever. Indeed, the alleged “fall of communism” of 1989/91 in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union was the greatest lie ever sold, precisely to confuse and strategically disarm the United States and the West and to finally swing the balance of world power in favor of world communism, the latter of which we can now observe, real-time, as open cooperation-blackmail and WWIII-threats.

Golitsyn is THE key to understanding this (and no less a man than once-CIA counterintelligence expert James Jesus Angleton came to appreciate the enormous value of Golitsyn’s fully accurate assessments as well as predictions). As an introduction to this, I recently published on my blog, beside much more extensive treatises on the same topic, a compilation entitled Photographic Proof the USSR Still Exists. Do read it, everybody, and awaken to the grim fact that Perestroika and Glasnost were simply a giant propaganda and brainwashing offensive to psychologically overwhelm and manipulate the West and remove from its eyes the IMAGE of the enemy, and the image only! 

All the best for your further work, and may God the Lord have mercy on us, 

O.R., Europe

l

And here is Westerman’s slick, evasive, and arrogant response, very obviously meant to defend his personal position of “respectability” as a good-for-nothing “analyst”, rather than to defend truth (that is foreign to him), published on that website a few days later – never mind that the editors there seem to be light-years away from willing to have a look into Golitsyn’s unique expertise on their part (bold print by this author; posted by TIA in their “What People Are Commenting” section on Sept. 3, 2013 under the header, “My Approach on Russia”):

Last week, a reader from Europe, O.R., sent a criticism to TIA for publishing Mr. Westerman’s articles on our website. According to this reader, his articles supposedly are out-of-touch for not considering the works of Golitsyn and Story. These authors – Mr. O.R. argues – defend that the fall of USSR never really happened. It is just a maneuver to deceive the West. TIA sent the criticism to Mr. Westerman. Below is his response. The Editor.

l

Atila,

l
Thanks for the opportunity to respond, and thanks to O.R. in Europe for his interest.
l l
I have read Golitsyn’s works as well as Story’s. They present a compelling case for a planned end to the USSR.
 l
Planned or not, however, the USSR did collapse, and, while I find the reasoning of Golitsyn and Story to be a valid explanation for the Soviet Union’s demise, the “it was all planned” hypothesis will be difficult for many to accept. Conspiracy theories, even if valid, tend not to be trusted by many if not most readers.
ll l
My approach is to document what is happening now in Russia and with its allies. I seek to show the link between the present and the old Soviet Union, as well as Moscow’s efforts to construct a new Communist State, which would be more in line with Lenin’s original intentions. I have consistently pointed out that the rulers in Moscow are a spy elite which traces its origins to the bloody Cheka of the early days of Bolshevik Russia.
l
In the end, it matters little if the current rulers in Moscow are following a grand plan from an earlier period or are simply totalitarians determined to cook up a “new and improved” Soviet Union. The result is the same: a clear and immediate threat to humanity which many, even many conservatives, are unwilling to acknowledge.
 l
I agree with O.R. as to the level of danger, but I also believe that the best course is to concentrate on Moscow’s present intentions and its links and identification with the Soviet past.
l
I hope this clarifies my approach
l
Best to all at TIA and to O.R. 
l
Toby Westerman
l
l
Because of this kind of analytical incompetence, mixed with dishonesty and probably financial considerations, whether on the part of politics, intelligence, or journalism, we have reached where we have reached. There appears to be neither clarity of thought nor courage left anywhere, and those few who are heroically explaining as true educators the intellectual as well as moral and spiritual shortcomings of the West that have led to the disaster at hand today, and who are able to most accurately analyse (in the fullest sense of the word) what Moscow, Beijing and allies are in fact up to, are being at best ignored, or otherwise ridiculed as hopeless relics of the Cold War era, resp. attacked as ‘McCarthyiites’ of yesteryear.
l
 l
 l
AN EXEMPLARY GEM PROVING THE WEST’S SUICIDAL BLINDNESS 
l
And so, as this author recently came across yet another jewel of Toby Westerman’s “at-face-value analytical depth”, he just couldn’t help using that article absurdly titled “Thanks, Putin – America Owes You a Debt of Gratitude” for a pars-pro-toto refutation (not an ad-hominem attack against Toby Westerman, whom this author doesn’t know and has no need of getting to know) of this comfortable general ‘consensus’ that, yes, things are bad, and Russia’s moves are disturbing, but we must wait and see and pray that this present Russian oligarchy under Putin will come to their senses in time, and maybe the upcoming midterm elections will give a boost to American conservatives, and maybe by January 20, 2017, Barack Obama and his Marxist friends will be history. These are DREAMS, it’s the stubborn refusal of reality, in fact putting one’s head in the sand!
What follows is Toby Westerman’s pointless article of March 17, 2014, just as it was posted on the TIA website, complete with illustrations, yet extended by a whole number of orange-coloured comments resp. rectifications, as well as added bold print, by this author:       

l

THANKS, PUTIN – AMERICA OWES YOU A DEBT OF GRATITUDE

By Toby Westerman

America owes a debt of gratitude to Russian president Vladimir Putin [Westerman throughout is personalising developments as if we were confronted with some Putin, the “lonely Czar”, rather than with a disciplined, well-oiled collective leadership machinery; premier Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, in contrast, always used the phrase, “the strategists”]. Before his Stalinist invasion of Ukrainian territory, few seemed concerned about Russia’s drive to modernize its military and Moscow’s ever tightening military alliance with China [the alliance, as shown by Golitsyn, had existed ever since 1957, despite all disinformation to the contrary, whereas recently that scissors strategy of disinformation merely gave way again to an overt display of their alliance, the switch from alleged Sino-Soviet split to “one clenched fist”; a mere change of appearance, not of fact]. After Putin’s military adventure in Crimea [it wasn’t an adventure, but a strategic chess move], a parade of experts, pundits, and talk show hosts are now talking about Putin’s goal of re-forming a new version of the Soviet Union, and some have even applied the term “communist” [rightfully so] to events in Russia. [Let’s see what ‘better’ and ‘deeper’ insight “expert” Westerman will provide us with …]

(INA Today readers, of course, have been informed of these and related matters for a decade and a half [having been fed half-truths and at-face-value “analyses”]).

Putin and the Plan [he keeps personalising the issue, proving his shortsightedness]

With this new awareness, a part of America’s news agencies is encouraging as vital a better understanding of the political oligarchy in Moscow and Beijing.

[Above:] An Eurasian Union is in motion to re-place the former USSR [the USSR has been all the while in place, through their internal structure of the “CIS” and with the CPSU still there behind the scenes; it’s simply coming out from its hiding and back to the forefront, that’s all; thus, not a “former” USSR is being replaced, but a temporarily covert USSR is now finally reappearing into plain sight; and that presently discussed “Eurasian Union” is only the preparation for what had been called for 25 years ago by Gorbachev and Shevardnadze as a “Common European Home from the Atlantic to Vladivostok”, that is a unified communist Eurasia including the whole of Western Europe!!! Western Europe, sooner rather than later, will be part of this extended Soviet Union, which by the end of the day will show that the so-called EU extension into the East was in fact a steady extension of Soviet influence over Western Europe, a Soviet Western extension! Also, they were boasting back then that the CSCE, now OSCE, was a net they’d thrown over Europe!!! Nothing of which, of course, Westerman dares to look at].

Putin is not merely a thug, a school yard bully or anything of the kind [they all are!!!]. He is a true believer in what he has referred to as “the cause” – Communism [otherwise he wouldn’t be President of the still-existing USSR!!!]. Various commentators, including talk show guru Rush Limbaugh, have stated this, but what is lacking is the realization that Putin is not alone in his desire to rebuild the Soviet Union. The restoration of the Soviet Union, in some version or other, has been the goal of the Moscow oligarchy since the collapse of USSR [For goodness sake, please stop talking of “oligarchs”; they are a political class, Bolshevist revolutionaries to the core; and we’re not seeing a “restoration” here, but a mere reemergence of something that had been kept hidden for 22 years, for reasons of strategy!].

While Russian president Boris Yeltsin, in 1992, was speaking to a joint session of the U.S. Congress and promising lasting peace and friendship, Russian spies continued to carry out Soviet-style deep penetration efforts against America and our allies [the main issue here is strategy, not the conventional spying business; and the problem of revolutionary moles in the Western structures, the most prominent and fatal one being Comrade Obama, is by far more crucial than spies: again, Westerman reveals he has no awareness of strategy and doesn’t even acknowledge the United States having been already in a post-revolutionary situation ever since Obama’s first election in 2008]. Yeltsin also took the first steps in forming what became under Putin, a “Union State” between Russia and the Stalinist pariah nation of Belarus. Where, it may be added, the KGB is still called the KGB [And so, what does this tell us??? Westerman fails in providing us with an explanation; which of course can only be that the “reforms” were only cosmetic, and done “more thoroughly” in the “once” RSFSR, now: Russian Federation, than in other Soviet republics. – Poor man: he simply can’t tell the forest for the trees!].

Putin continued and accelerated what Yeltsin had begun [Yeltsin had begun nothing. He merely was one element in the long chain of consecutive phases of their long-range strategy towards world communist domination; Westerman, go home, you haven’t understood a thing!]. The Russian army retained Soviet-era insignia and banners; Soviet Cold War spies, living and dead, were given special honors; the mass murderer, Josef Stalin, acquired a new coat of whitewash; even the cruiser Aurora, which is credited in Soviet lore for playing a key role in the Bolshevik overthrow of the Russian Provisional Government – which took power after the Tsar’s abdication – has again been given the pride of place it enjoyed in the Soviet era [this stretch is typical of Westerman: although he keeps listing mind-blowing fact after mind-blowing fact, which basically all prove a seamless continuity of the USSR all the way through the 1990s till today, he doesn’t and cannot come up with a coherent explanation or conclusion. He is registering, he is alarmed, yet he doesn’t understand, and so he leaves his readers with no clues about what these facts actually mean!].

l

The Role of the Ukraine

Russia and Ukraine share a common history that goes back over a thousand years [yet, the year 1917 marked, factually, a new year count, a radical new beginning akin to the French Revolution, which was the historical forerunner of the October Revolution]. Often, this shared history has been bloody and bitter, but similarities in language and culture [and particularly in their being two Socialist Soviet Republics of one and the same still-intact USSR!] make events in Ukraine immediate and vivid to the Russian people [a funny way of putting it; yet, we are not talking about a national question here, but about the USSR, along with all her allies around the world, prepping up for WWIII]. Ukraine was an important part of the Tsarist Empire and one of the original members of the USSR. In the Soviet era [he speaks of a “Soviet Era” as a thing of the past, yet the Soviet Union is still there, Mr. Westerman, and it isn’t being restored, but simply reemerging from its 22-year hiding], Ukraine was not only an important agricultural area, but also a center of industry.

Today, much of Russia’s natural gas exported to Europe goes through Ukrainian territory. Putin and the Moscow political oligarchy recognize that Ukraine is an important element in a new Soviet Union because of its historical ties to Russia [“historical ties to Russia” is typical Western-bourgeois sentimental babble; what communism once owns, it never lets go again, as simple as that! No need for well-measured historico-cultural findings. The only culture that is shared by post-revolutionary Moscow and post-revolutionary Kiev is Bolshevist, idiot!], its strategic location between Europe and Russia, its sheer size (the second largest nation in Europe [Ukraine ceased to be a “nation” many, many decades ago when it was forever subjected to communist rule during the years of the Red Terror; what we are dealing with is – still – an SSR, a Soviet Socialist Republic, not a nation!]), as well as its continued economic importance.

[Above:] Ousted president Viktor Yanukovych, disliked for his extreme pro-Russian, policies and corruption

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union [what a faithful servant of Soviet disinformation Westerman is: never once he questions the official version of a “collapse of the Soviet Union” as possibly having been a deception instead, a simple change of labels; he watches, and yet he cannot see!], Ukrainian leaders continued a generally pro-Moscow policy [there was no pro- or anti-Moscow “policy” on the part of the “Ukrainian leaders”, there was only joint strategic action behind the scenes; with some temporary allowance of an “Orange Revolution” feeding illusionary expectations mainly in the West]. Thousands of Russians migrated to Ukraine after the collapse of the Soviet Union, giving Moscow additional leverage in Ukraine’s affairs [even stronger influence than in official Soviet times? Come on! This is nonsense! Ukraine was and still is a firm part of the still-intact USSR, despite all the fuzz and “independence movement” going on! It’s deception!!!].

Of the post-Soviet [rather: still-Soviet!!!] Ukrainian leaders, none has labored more intently for Moscow than Viktor Yanukovych, who was first elected president in a rigged election in 2004. He was removed from office by another election in 2005, after mass demonstrations were carried out, known as the Orange Revolution. A split in the “Orange” movement allowed Yanukovych to be reelected in 2010, only to be deposed by mass protests in February 2014 because of his extreme pro-Russian policies, corruption, and generally tyrannical rule [and only an idiot would have ever thought that Yushchenko-style freedom and democracy would ever prevail in a Soviet Socialist Republic!!! There was also Vaclav Havel in Czechia; he was controlled. There was Lech Walesa in Poland; he was controlled too! They just move their chess pawns back and forth, advancing their strategy all the while; if they make mistakes, they take detours, that’s all].

The pro-freedom movement [more likely: the “pro-freedom provocation”, and weren’t these barricades really impressive???] that removed Yanukovych was not merely a localized rejection against Russian dominance and world-class corruption, but was, and continues to be, a direct threat to the existence of the Moscow political oligarchy [which is precisely what the Soviet strategists, whom you call “oligarchs”, want you, Westerman, and the West to believe!!!].

 

Moscow Fears a Revolution by Its Own People [Really?]

Putin’s desire to have Ukraine as a member of a nascent Soviet State [Putin is little more than a figure-head; he is not so much determining policies, but merely executing longrange strategy!] is second only to the knowledge that Moscow must suppress the pro-Western revolution that ousted Yanukovych. Moscow justifiably fears the contagion of the democratic spirit which is now evident in Ukraine [don’t say “evident”, say “apparent”, because all that you are describing is the mere surface of events, that you are unable to properly assess and interpret!].

For all the pro-Soviet propaganda and political manipulation after the collapse of the USSR [not again!], there still exists within the Russian people [the Russian people, the Russian culture irreversibly was consigned to the midden-heap of history by the Bolshevist Revolution; there is no longer a “Russian people”, there is only a Soviet “people”, which actually was the wording during the official USSR!], a desire for true human freedom [not true: they were “taught”, particularly by the calculated economic chaos under Yeltsin, that one cannot eat democracy. They do not long for freedom, whether political or economic, they long for stability, guaranteed minimum wages and pensions, and finally they long for Soviet greatness throughout the world!]. Moscow knows this, and lives in fear of it [which is why they are now most relaxedly laughing at NATO and the West??? Come on, Toby!].

[Above:] The people of Ukraine protest in the streets against the Putin invasion [personalisation again; here one should also perhaps throw in an important lesson every student of art history already learns in his first semester: to neatly discern between what his eyes can see and what his interpretative mind wants to see. What we actually see in the photograph to the right is a young man, surrounded by other young people draped in Ukrainian flags, who holds up a card-board sign saying, “Putin! Hands off Ukraine” in his one hand and a megaphone in the other. That is basically all that can be said about this photograph! Everything else is interpretation! When Westerman says the people of Ukraine protest, one could just as well speculate that probable Komsomol members are staging a protest, and so, if one chooses to interpret further, in a suspiciously calm manner!]

The unrest [resp., the probably staged “unrest”] recently unleashed on the streets of Kiev is the most significant reason for Moscow’s intervention [how does Westerman know? The reason for Moscow’s “intervention” much more likely is a mere playing out of strategy, and of mobilising the Soviet Army under a false pretext in an obvious preparation for World War]. The seriousness of this threat was made clear, ironically, by a political leader supposedly in opposition to Putin’s ruling party [surprisingly, here Westerman admits the existence of controlled or false opposition within the Russian State Duma, yet again without coming to the inevitable conclusion that some other force behind must be in control of all these apparent different parties, which is of course and always has been ever since 1992 the unchanged CPSU, that is operating from the shadows]. Communist Party Gennady Zyuganov declared with remarkable candor that “It is possible that in two years there will be a similar scenario in Russia,” if Moscow did not take action [Westerman parrotting a classic piece of misleading disinformation by Zyuganov, that implies that “Russia” is on the defensive, weak, and under pressure; yet, this is the classic “weak look” as taught by ancient Chinese strategic thinker Sun Tzu and frequently used by the Soviets to confuse the West about their real strength and their real intentions].

Moscow was extremely fearful of the “colored revolutions,” [they were either entirely in charge of them, or at least admitting them for some limited time!!!] inspired by the 2004 Orange Revolution and its spread to what Russia calls its “near abroad,” the States of the former Soviet Union [he never uses quotation marks, as he is a true believer in today’s “Russia” as a “former” instead of an unchanged Soviet Union]. Moscow’s spy services took action in cooperation with pro-Russian elements within the “near abroad” States to blunt the effects of that expression of human freedom [but what if the apparent roll-back is simply a removal of the illusion of post-Soviet “independence”???]. To a large extent, Moscow was successful [of course, it is; how can it not be, with Communists in control of all power centres also throughout the Western world, that in addition is by now completely unable to challenge a Russian-Chinese-led, read: all-out pan-Communist, military threat!!!].

After the overthrow of Yanukovych [“overthrow” is already an interpretation for which we do not have sufficient data to prove it, despite the dramatic protests against his opulent lifestyle; all that we can say is that Yanukovich disappeared], however, the same cold fear is again motivating Putin and the rest of Russia’s political class [come on: the ruling political class in the Kremlin is far from being afraid, whether of Kiev or the West!].

The [apparent] demonstrators in Kiev now were not merely [apparently] protesting a corrupt election. They rejected what would certainly become Ukraine’s merger with the new Soviet State, and the ousting of a loyal pro-Moscow figure [so it seemed]. The demonstrators [apparently] brazenly denounced the lies from both Yanukovych and his Russian masters. Putin had to make a bold move or risk not only a serious blow to his plans for a re-formed Soviet Union, but also face the wrath of his own people awakened by the cries of freedom coming from the streets of Kiev. [What a naїve look at events: Russia forced to react in the face of a freedom movement threatening to get out of control. Maybe we should feel sorry for the people in the Kremlin, given all the distress and crisis. Yet, what is getting ever clearer, and has been the much more plausible explanation all along, is that it’s again, like in 1989, 1991, or 1993, a well-planned and theatrically enacted provocation to distract the West’s attention from the ongoing military buildup almost certainly directed not against the still-communist Ukrainian SSR, but against the West!]

Although most of the world condemns his actions, Putin does have a loyal, and increasingly powerful, friend. In his confrontation with the West, Putin has a long cultivated ally. [Stop talking about “Putin”! The People’s Republic of China isn’t predominantly an ally of Putin, but of the (still-intact) USSR, and has been such, no matter what, since the late 1950s!]

 

An Old Moscow-Beijing Axis Recently Acknowledged

Some commentators have taken note of China’s support of Moscow’s invasion of Ukrainian territory, and the similarity of Russia’s land grab to China’s claim to the South China Sea, which is mineral rich and a vital corridor for world shipping. [Because these two communist great powers are engaged in a joint strategy, that requires joint, coordinated moves!]

Suddenly, some pundits are recognizing the common interests, methods, and close cooperation between Moscow and Beijing. [Oh yes! They call it: World Revolution!!!] This was not supposed to happen. [At least for those who naїvely believed in the authenticity of the alleged Sino-Soviet split!]

[Above:] Putin continues the Yeltsin/Jiang Zemin plans for a New World Order to replace US leadership. [He certainly continues Russian-Chinese cooperation towards a Russian-Chinese-controlled “New World Order”, yet that “New World Order” is intended to be a “New World Social Order”, i.e. communism everywhere in the world; also, this joint strategy leads much farther back than to Yeltsin and Jiang Zemin, but to Khrushchev and Mao Zedong, who commissioned the formulation of a joint communist longrange strategy of deception a.k.a. the “Shelepin Plan”. Anatoliy Golitsyn, when he defected over to the West in December of 1961, sacrificed for himself a privileged life in the Soviet structures so to let the West know of this deadly longrange strategy, even facing terrible ridicule and denigration in his new home country, the United States; he then sacrificed the greater part of his life in the West, i.e. at least until 1995, for continuingly warning and trying to educate Western decision-makers as for what lies ahead with most inevitable certainty, unless the West would in time awake to the communist bloc’s longrange scheme. The West “knew better”, and as a result we are now all awaiting indeed the second October Revolution. Westerman ignores all of this!]

After the collapse of the USSR, pundits in the U.S., of various political persuasions, speculated that fear of an increasingly powerful China would drive Russia to align with the West. These pundits, however, failed to acknowledge that Yeltsin’s Russia had, early on, began a policy of providing military assistance to China, providing technical aid, training for officers, and military hardware. [Westerman continues his line of “It started under Yeltsin”, which is pure nonsense. Moscow and Beijing had been tight allies ever since Khrushchev and Mao had sorted out any of their internal differences, adopting a split for outward consumption only, which soon was to lead the United States – by the mistaken, if not treacherous recommendations by then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger – to believe they could “contain” the USSR by opening up to, and building up as a great power, the People’s Republic of China. By this suicidal decision the groundwork was laid in selling the communists the rope by which to hang the hated capitalist world! Yet, not a word by Westerman about the Sino-Soviet split having been a long-term deception!] 

Moscow’s assistance to China has continued for years, unnoticed among the U.S. pundits, who still expect a U.S.-Russian alliance against China [also here, Westerman forgets to mention that the U.S.’s opening up to China in the early 1970s had in mind precisely the opposite: a U.S.-Chinese alliance against the Soviet Union. So, why has this expectation turned out as futile? Because both Moscow and Beijing were jointly fooling the United States and the West! Golitsyn called it the Scissors Strategy].

There also existed among U.S. policymakers and politicians the belief that the Chinese people would eventually emulate the example of Russia and rid themselves of their communist overlords [Amazing how many major flaws Westerman puts alongside each other in one short sentence: there is no Russian people any more, and bascially no longer a Chinese people either, only a “liberated” Soviet people, whether in the stil-intact USSR or in the PRC, and certainly did the Soviet people not rid itself of its communist oppressors in 1991, which was, like the events of 1989, the smoothest “fall” of a tyrannical system in the whole of human history! As a consequence, there’s no example for the people of “China” to emulate so to get rid of their tyrants, in the first place!] This confidence was so great that the U.S. exported much of its manufacturing capability to the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). Politicians hoped that industrialization and a new wealthy class would lead to the end of communist rule, and U.S. manufacturers saw great opportunity for quick profits from selling both to U.S. markets and satisfying a burgeoning consumer class. [Because they were duped, both politicians and industrialists, by communist lies and deception!]

In the meantime, millions of American workers permanently lost their jobs.

The American political leadership remained blind to the reality that none of their preconceptions were based on fact. Not only did Russia and China grow closer [they didn’t grow closer, but the strategic phase of projecting a split between them was slowly nearing its end], but in 1997, Yeltsin and then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin jointly declared a New World Order that would counter, and eventually replace, American leadership in the world. [Again, we’re talking about communist world revolution here, and by definition all communist parties, whether in communist states or in the West, are engaged in it: the goal is “Worldwide Democratic Peace”, i.e. global communist tyranny, or communist world domination! Whilst Westerman portrays it as some kind of conventional geopolitics!]

Putin again carried on and intensified what Yeltsin had begun [not begun, only continued]. Russian military aid to the PRC evolved into a full-scale military and naval alliance. Joint exercises are held involving ground, air, and sea forces of both nations. Moscow and Beijing are even considering a joint lunar base. As one military commentator on Fox News recently acknowledged, America is indeed facing a “Moscow-Beijing axis.” [And so a communist revolutionary axis determined to bring about infamous “World October”, doubt it not!!!]

l

Options? [No more options! America & the West now stand with their backs against the wall!]

To put the matter bluntly, neither the U.S., nor its European allies are ready to face Putin’s Russia [it isn’t “Russia”, but still the Soviet Union, and it belongs not to Putin, but to the Communist Party SU], an expanding China, and certainly not an alliance between Russia and China [at least, Westerman acknowledges this!]. Years of denial and self-deception have put us in a very dangerous position. Our options are limited, but they can be effective. [There are no more options, not to think of “effective” ones. The pan-communist bloc is now pushing forward, using its military superiority not only as a means of blackmail, but soon, it appears, as the very concrete means to win a global war and install communism throughout the world – no matter the casualties, and once and for all, they’re convinced! Yet, Westerman is playing down the scope and meaning of it all!]

To its credit, the E.U. is showing cooperation with the U.S. in placing some sanctions against Russia, and a political pact between the new Ukrainian government and the European Union is in the works. [At which the Soviets are simply laughing, knowing they’ve swung the balance of power irreversibly!]

There is, however, also the question of how much pressure the E.U. is able or willing to put on Russia. [Regarding the question of will, the two dominant countries in the EU, Germany and France, are ruled by an East-German communist apparatchik and a French socialist! The European Commission is headed by a “former” Maoist student leader at the University of Lisbon! Regarding their ability, well, the Russians certainly won’t lose time in making use of Europe’s energy dependence on Russia and of West European investments in Russia, before Europe could possibly free itself from this dilemma! – And, by the way, who was it, in the case of Germany, who set in motion Germany’s suicidal “Energiewende” back in the late 1990s, that was based on the green-communist lie of Anthropogenic Global Warming? It was the radical-left Red-Green Schröder-Fischer government, with their Minister for the Environment (also known as Germany’s “Salon Stalinist” No. 1), Jürgen Trittin! And who even further accelerated Germany’s exit from nuclear energy, merely two days after the Fukushima accident of March 11, 2011? The succeeding supposedly “conservative” coalition government of CDU/CSU and FDP, led by “former” East German Marxist-Leninist, Angela Merkel, who has remained in power to this day, meanwhile in a coalition with the Social Democrats! The West European countries are being crippled from within!!! – One more delicate aspect: What are former Chancellor Gerd Schröder (SPD) and former Vice Chancellor and Foreign Minister Joseph “Joschka” Fischer (Greens) doing today? Schröder is, beside his resumed profession as a lawyer, as well as a plethora of other splendidly payed activities, chairman of the board of the Nord Stream AG owned at 51% by the Russian gas giant Gazprom and engaged in building a submarine gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea from Russia to Germany; in other words, Schröder, a declared Marxist, functions as a lobbyist for Soviet-Russian expansionist interests! Joschka Fischer, on the other hand, once a Marxist-radical street fighter, too is involved with energy. He is i.a. a consultant with the German power supplier RWE and with the Austrian oil concern OMV. European energy dependence on Russia is key for the Soviet strategists, and comrades Schröder and Fischer, among many others, are helping the Russian bear in this strategic operation!] Unfortunately, unlike the period of the post-WWII Soviet threat, Europe is closely tied economically to Russia. The European Union gets one-third of its natural gas from Russia, and European financial institutions had heavily invested in Russia. Norway could assist Europe, as could the U.S., if unnecessary regulations were relaxed, but a change of suppliers would take time, increase costs, and the possibility of retaliation by Moscow would loom large. [So, what are the “effective options” then, Mr. Westerman?]

Although E.U. sanctions would be costly to Russia, Putin is betting that Russia can stand the pain, while Europe will not. [And you can bet he is right in his betting!]

[Above:] The US should back the anti-communist demonstrations like those in Caracas, Venezuela. [A U.S. under communist Obama will never support anti-communist protest movements! A pipedream!]

There is, however, another possibility for pressuring Moscow [really?], and it would not involve the vulnerable European economies. The United States could demonstrate its displeasure with Russian aggression and express its commitment to freedom by supporting pro-freedom manifestations in Moscow’s neo-communist allies in Latin America. [Which would certainly turn around the global balance of world power back to America’s favour in an instance! Does Westerman even think? The communisation of Latin America, by now, is almost complete. And before dreaming of supporting the conservative movements in these countries, one has to address the murderous fact that a second-generation Stalinist resides in the White House in Washington D.C.! As long as he and his comrades are in power, America won’t be able to do anything. In fact, as things stand now, America no longer exists! Not to mention the present Pope being an even more radical Marxist than his five preceding Conciliar Popes together! So, not even the Catholic Church will stand up against the world revolution; instead, it is part of it!]

The pro-Moscow governments in Latin America, Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua have recently hosted Russian bombers and warships. [You see: Kennedy was risking war over this. But where is the reaction now, under Obama? Nothing!] The intent is clear: turn Caribbean Latin American waters into a Russian lake. Moscow’s Latin friends, however, do have a problem: in each nation there are significant pro-democracy elements [fatally, supported by no one!].

It is our best interests to aid these pro-freedom groups [what is Westerman talking about, when he says, “Our best interest”? There is no such “We” any longer, as not the conservative parts of the U.S. population are in charge, and not even the military, but a hardcore-communist as President!], both from a moral and a strategic view. [The first moral obligation of truthful, conservative America should be to save itself from the communists presently in power at home! Then, they can think about moral obligations towards other nations. As for strategy, one can only ask what sort of “strategic thinking” Westerman has in mind, especially as he has no understanding of communist strategy whatsoever!]

Although the present administration would find this strategy distasteful, it is certainly open to the next U.S. President [there are almost 3 more years to go until January 20, 2017 – the year, by the way, of the centennial of the October Revolution. Does Mr. Westerman seriously believe that Moscow, Beijing, and their helpers around Obama will give the United States that much time, let alone a real chance, to take the country back???]. Moscow is planning for the long term. America must recognize this fact and do the same. [But it’s game over already, Westerman! Wake up! America should have done the same, but hasn’t. That is all that can be said. There’s no more time or room for turning this thing around again; not any longer!]

It is long past time to deny Moscow the naval and air presence in Latin America, which the Russian military now enjoys in Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua [you see!]. The Moscow oligarchy has shown its capacity for aggression when their interests seem to demand it. [This is not about the demands of “seeming interests” of a “Moscow oligarchy”, but about the firm revolutionary determination of the disciples of Marx and Lenin to establish, finally, a World Communist Federation across the entire globe, leaving non- and anti-communists perhaps with the only option, as Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov warned 30 years ago, to “defect” to Antarctica and live there with the penguins, which is of course an illusion as well!] The United States has every right to insure its safety and protect those who have the same values of human integrity, whether in Ukraine or in Latin America [but, tragically, lacks the political will and the capacity to do so! A useless article ending with a tame and defensive, politically correct phrase arguing the United States – at least – has got the moral highground; a way of thinking the Soviet imperialist madmen just laugh at mercilessly, as all that is moral to them is what serves the world revolution!!!].

Posted March 17, 2014

______________________________________

l

Toby Westerman, certainly terrified given the seriousness of the situation, but either unable or unwilling to put it all in proper perspective.

Toby Westerman, certainly terrified given the seriousness of the situation, but either unable or unwilling to put it all in proper perspective.

l

Also, Toby Westerman was interviewed by Cliff Kincaid on March 26, 2014 (the photo above was picked from that video by this author). They discussed the current Ukrainian crisis and Russia’s and China’s ever more aggressive stance against the West, in which the two powers appear to no longer bother about behaving nice or civilised or diplomatic. Unfortunately, despite Cliff Kincaid’s persistent questions, Toby Westerman carefully evaded the issue of a communist longrange strategy of deception as explained and warned of by Anatoliy Golitsyn (and without which the communist world – that is not “again-communist”, but STILL-communist – would never ever have been able to swing the balance of world power in its favour!).

______________________________________ 

l

l

THE HIGHLY UNCOMFORTABLE REAL STUFF, THAT IS NOT FOR THE FAINT-HEARTED 

Anybody seriously interested in the real nature and scope of present developments should read – rather than Westerman’s good-for-nothing sleeping pills – the following three books, that are absolutely key for understanding the situation and that should be regarded as unmatched, top-reference literature. Whatever one feels inclined to read in addition – certainly, the articles on this blog are very much recommended as a substantial introduction to this huge topic -, nonetheless it is these four absolutely outstanding books (plus a few interviews and lectures featuring these authors) that are perfectly enough to acquire a proper knowledge and grasp of what so-called “Russia” and so-called “China” are really up to:

 

ANATOLIY GOLITSYN: New Lies for Old: The Communist Strategy of Deception and Disinformation; Dodd, Mead & Co., New York 1984. (Read the book online for free as a complete scanned-in PDF-copy here, or try and order it via amazon.com here!) 

ANATOLIY GOLITSYN: The Perestroika Deception: The World’s Slide Towards the Second October Revolution; Edward Harle Ltd., London-New York 1995. (Read the book online for free as a complete scanned-in PDF-copy here, or try and order it via amazon.com here!)

CHRISTOPHER STORY: The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States – A Study in Russian and German Strategy to Complete Lenin’s World Revolution; Edward Harle Ltd., London-New York 2002. (Read the book online for free as a complete scanned-in PDF-copy here, or try and order it via amazon.co.uk here!)

CHRISTOPHER STORY: A one-hour interview of 1995, conducted by Bill McIlhaney, on Anatoliy Golitsyn and the Soviet Union’s perestroika deception: part 1; part 2.

CHRISTOPHER STORY: One-hour-follow-up interview of 2003, again conducted by Bill McIlhaney, discussing the same issues, yet from the perspective of 2003: click here.

CHRISTOPHER STORY: “Lenin’s Satanic World Revolution”. – A 50-minute public talk at the “Fatima: 2000” World Peace Bishops’ Conference at Hamilton, ON, Canada, Oct. 11 – 18, 1999. Christopher Story at his best! A marvellous – and very, very comprehensive – talk that, luckily, is still preserved on the web: click here.

YURI BEZMENOV: 80-minute interview of 1984, conducted by G. Edward Griffin, titled, “Deception Was My Job: On the Soviet Subversion of the Free World Press”: click here

YURI BEZMENOV: One-hour public lecture on Soviet-communist subversion, given in 1983 in Los Angeles: click here

 

Thanks for your attention and reading!

______________________________________

l

All other articles on this blog can be checked out here.

 

Photographic Proof the USSR Still Exists

Lenin Mausoleum, groß

A picture, they say, is worth a thousand words. Thus, in 2013, it came to the mind of this author to put together – beside the lengthy treatises presented on this blog – a collection of irrefutable photographic evidence, along with extensive comments, which totally vindicates premier Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsynwho predicted as early as 1984 a fake collapse of communism soon to come in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, designed to psychologically and militarily disarm the United States and the West and to eventually swing the balance of world power in favour of an unchanged pan-communist bloc. The compilation below has been updated and extended in December 2019.

More than three decades after Gorbachev’s deceptive proclamation of “perestroika” and “glasnost”, the theatrical fall of the Berlin Wall and the taking down of the Red Banner from the Kremlin’s rooftop, the course of events hasn’t precisely worked out as expected by the naïve economic and political elites of the West, but has proven Anatoliy Golitsyn’s analyses and predictions entirely accurate, which had warned of a giant disinformation programme, of a deceptive “reform” in the communist bloc, meant to put the West to sleep. Thirty years later, the non-communist world indeed finds itself faced with renewed hostility, even blackmail, all too reminiscent of the days of the Cold War and is being lectured about the free market as its system of economic and societal organisation to have allegedly failed. The supposed Sino-Soviet split of earlier decades has given way to an overt military alliance, with the two powers now working in a geostrategic division of labour to gain control over the remaining non-communist world. The communistic UN is getting ever more aggressive in overruling the national sovereignty of individual countries by pushing its fictitious sustainable-development-agenda. And the EU is showing ever more clearly its true, deep-red colours, and has long since been in the process of being swallowed by the perfectly intact communist bloc via its continuing eastward-enlargement, that slowly but surely turns out to have been a Soviet westward-enlargement instead, fulfilling Gorbachev’s and Shevardnadze’s maxim of 1990 of a “Common European home from the Atlantic to Vladivostok”, in other words a united communist Eurasia! With the United States herself, already quite driven apart from her European and increasingly all other allies, under the rule, for eight years under Obama, of a plain-Marxist gang, and now facing potential civil war as a completely radicalised Democratic Party cannot accept an anti-communist such as Donald J. Trump in the White House any longer. There’s no doubt we have reached at the end point of the communist longrange deception strategy launched around 1960 under the auspices of Khrushchev and Mao. The communists have nearly won, if only by deception, with their final act of a worldwide bloodbath waiting, it seems, already around the corner.

Take your time for reflecting on what you will see and read below and be ready for having your mind blown: The so-called “Russian Federation” (formerly, RSFSR), along with the whole of the “Commonwealth of Independent States” (formerly, USSR), are in reality the same old Marxist-Leninist revolutionary entity as they had been prior to the Soviet Union’s deceptive breakup in late 1991! There has been no change. None, other than cosmetic!

 

CLICK ON IMAGES TO ENLARGE!

 

lThis is the left half of a truly revolutionary Soviet post stamp of 1988. It brags, “Perestroika prodolzenye Oktyabrya”, i.e. “Perestroika continues the October (Revolution)”. The right half of the stamp reads, “Uskorenye. Demokratisatsiya. Glasnosty”, i.e. “ACCELERATION. Democratisation. Openness.” What a frank admission confirming that perestroika was a well-planned 360°-offensive designed to overwhelm a Western world unable to grasp what was really going on and to set the stage for ultimate communist World October! Gorbachev’s so-called “reforms” merely marked a new, much more dangerous phase in the Revolution! (Click on image to see the post stamp in its entirety!)

Another puzzling case in point is their programmatic book, Perestroika, published in 1987 under the authorship of Mikhail Gorbachev. The book was translated into dozens of languages and sold in some 5 million copies worldwide: so, this was certainly no minor initiative on the part of the Soviet apparat, but an important move to laying out to the “interested” in the West what perestroika was ultimately about. It appears that the Soviets, who have always been thoroughly studying the Western mentality, must have counted on a general laziness and unwillingness to read so widespread nowadays in the societies of the free world. But, left-wing circles in Europe and America will definitely have studied the book; so did a handful of truly dedicated analysts – such as, e.g., the late Christopher Story. It seems, Perestroika wasn’t published in exactly identical versions, as the quite differing titles suggest. The English version’s full title went: “Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World”; the French: “Perestroïka: Vues Neuves sur Notre Pays et le Monde” (thus, not “New Thinking”, but “New Vistas …”); the Spanish, coyly: “Perestroika: Nuevas Ideas para Nuestra País y el Mundo” (i.e. “New Ideas …”). But by far the boldest title was that of the German version (left) – and Germany, of course, at the time and even now was and is in the immediate focus of the Soviet strategists, as they viewed a German reunification not as a loss of their geopolitical influence in Europe but, on the contrary, as an opportunity for them to firmly gain access to once-Western Europe, using a unified Germany, as they did, as a jumping-board; three decades later, 11 out of 28 member states of the meanwhile greatly enlarged as well as utterly centralised, if not to say: Sovietised, European Union are “former” socialist countries!!! So, here’s the German title (as can be read in the picture above): “Perestroika: Die Zweite Russische Revolution – Eine Neue Politik für Europa und die Welt”, i.e. “Perestroika: The Second Russian Revolution – A New Policy (or: New Politics) for Europe and the World”. Shouldn’t that odd title alone have raised sufficient suspicion in Western policy circles in order to really have a proper look into that book? And mind that it doesn’t say, “New Policy for the USSR”, but “New Policy for Europe and the World”, thus revealing beyond doubt the true nature of perestroika, namely that of a political offensive, worse: a deadly programme for the fundamental restructuring, transformation, and ultimately communisation of the Western world. As for the book’s content, one is immediately reminded of another highly consequential book that should have been read but wasn’t: Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Had the people of Germany, and the peoples of the world, carefully studied Hitler’s programmatic book, they would have precisely known what the Nazis were up to. Same with Gorbachev’s Perestroika. Here are some quotes taken from the German edition and translated, including emphases in bold-print and brief notes in square brackets, by this author (the English version can be read, as a free PDF, here):

“In the West, including the U.S., Perestroika is being interpreted in a variety of ways. There is the view that Perestroika has been recognised as inevitable due to the catastrophic state of the Soviet economy; it would mirror the frustration over socialism and a crisis of its ideals and highest goals. Nothing could be further from the truth than such interpretations, whatever motives may be behind them. Of course, the discontent about how things have developed in our country in recent years has been a major reason for us to launch Perestroika. However, to a far greater extent, it was the realisation that the potential of socialism had been made use of insufficiently. Now, as we are celebrating the 70th birthday of our revolution, we are becoming very much aware of this. We have at our disposal a sound material basis, rich experience [an allusion, definitely, to Lenin’s deceptive ‘New Economic Policy’ of the 1920s, after which the alleged reforms of the 1980s were modelled], and a clear worldview [meaning, that of Marxism-Leninism!!!]With that foundation, we are able to focussedly and continuously improve our society and work on making ever greater use of all our activities, qualitatively and quantitatively [in other words, Perestroika represents the total mobilisation of all resources, be they economic, political, diplomatic, military, or intelligence].”

“Despite all contradictions in today’s world, despite the variety of societal and political systems, and despite the different paths nations have taken in history, this world remains an undividable whole. We are all passengers on board of Ship Earth, and we must not allow it to be destroyed. There won’t be a second Noah’s Ark.” [This is the exact language of the so-called environmental movement, that is simply being used as a vehicle for the implementation of brutal, merciless communism worldwide. Gorbachev himself was deeply involved in the Earth Summit of 1993 and also set up in the ’90s an alleged environmental organisation by name of Green Cross International.] 

“We openly confess that we refuse the hegemonial endeavours and globalist claims of the United States. We are not pleased by some aspects of American policy and of the American Way of Life [!!!]. But we respect the right of the American people, just as the right of all other peoples, to live along its own rules and laws, its own morals and inclinations [!!!!!!!!].

“We do not hold any evil intent towards the American people [an outright lie!]. We are ready and willing to cooperate with them in all fields [of course, but only where it serves the communists; at the same time, the old Soviet ‘anti-bourgeois’ contempt remains unchanged]. Yet, we want cooperation on the basis of equality, reciprocity, and mutual understanding. Sometimes we are more than disappointed, and even have serious doubts, when our country is termed by the United States [accurately so] an aggressor and ‘evil empire’. The most unbelievable stories and lies about us are being disseminated, mistrust and enmity are being shown towards our people, limitations are being used against us, and uncivilised behaviour blamed upon us. This proofs of intolerable shortsightedness [a clear threat!].”

The function of Patrice-Lumumba-University for Peoples’ Friendship, named in 1961 after the Congolese communist “martyr”, was for thirty years, till the “end of the Soviet Union” in late 1991, to “help developing nations” by training students from those countries as engineers, medical doctors, scientists, agricultural experts, economists (read: economic planners!), and certainly Russian speakers, so as to supposedly assist those countries in their effort to develop. Allegedly, courses were being kept fairly non-ideological. However, this endeavour, that was overseen by the Party and KGB, was in no way selfless, but constituted a grand influence-building operation. At the same time, there was intense recruiting going on, as the following selection of the institution’s “alumni” illustrates. We find here such charming leftwing celebrities as Palestinian Fattah leader Mahmud Abbas (a Marxist); Venezuelan communist terrorist Ilich Ramírez Sánchez a.k.a. Carlos the Jackal; Nicaraguan Sandinista-communist and today “social democrat” Daniel Ortega; leader of the communist, narco-terrorist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), Timoleón Jiménez (a.k.a. “Timochenko”) alias Rodrigo Londoño Echeverri; South-West-African People’s Organisation (SWAPO) “politician” and Namibian President from 2005 till 2015, Hifikepunye Pohamba; the late Sri Lankan Marxist revolutionary, Rohana Wijeweera; Guyana’s People’s Progressive Party (PPP) “politician” and from 1999 till 2011 Guyana’s President, Bharrat Jagdeo; Bolivian communist and comrade-in-arms of Che Guevara, Osvaldo Peredo; and, as rumour has it: Iran’s current Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei! Now, along with the overall “changes” in the Soviet Union in 1991/1992 (by which the Soviet Union strangely abolished itself), also Patrice Lumumba University for People’s Friendship changed: It changed its name. Henceforth, it was the “Russian University for People’s Friendship“. In other words, communist “people’s friendship” was still on the agenda. It’s still operating today, along the exact same lines as in the days of the official Soviet Union. And, just so every foreign student understands where he is actually studying, there is an unchanged Soviet coat of arms, complete with “CCCP”, meaning USSR, right on the front over the main entrance (for which one has to enlarge the photograph).      

Regarding the melodramatic fake “hardliners’ coup” of August 1991, that directly led to the “prohibition” of the CPSU and the “dissolution” of the USSR, these hardliners allegedly were put into prison (only one, Minister of the Interior Boris Pugo, along with his wife, supposedly committed “suicide” so to give the whole operetta greater credibility), never to be heard of again in the West. The truth, however, is quite amazing: Just as premier defector Anatoliy Golitsyn had analysed in real-time and predicted that the protagonists of this provocation would soon be rehabilitated and would continue their former careers, exactly that came to pass (and, as for Boris Pugo, Golitsyn made clear that Russia is a vast country with many places to hide even privileged nomenklaturists for a whole lifetime). Here, for one example, we have former Defence Minister and “plotter” of 1991, Marshal Dmitriy Yasov (born 1924 and still alive today), being decorated on November 17, 2004 by President Vladimir Putin. Note the expression and overall posture of Yasov, showing him, as the man of the “old” Soviet Union that he is, obviously very much pleased by how things are going for “new, post-Soviet” Russia. In this picture you have the full continuity of the Soviet Union documented, and it even doesn’t need a single comment. Strong proof of the continuity is also the fact that Yasov in 1998 (still under Yeltsin!) returned into a prominent position as advisor at the Defence Ministry of the Russian Federation!

Another prominent example: Here’s former Deputy Defence Minister and Commander-in-Chief of the Soviet Land Forces, as well as “plotter” of 1991, General Valentin Varennikov (1923 – 2009), together with President Vladimir Putin on April 11, 2002. Varennikov was from 1995 a member of the state Duma for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and co-founded in 2003 a new “socialist-nationalist” party named “Rodina” (i.e. “Motherland”). Also, do carefully watch the body language of the two men, who are both military men, as Putin isn’t merely KGB, but, even by his own admission, GRU, which is Soviet and now-Russian military intelligence: The image shows them as part of a collective Soviet leadership and destroys the myth popular in the West of Putin, the “lonely Tsar”.

Lomonosov Moscow State University’s main building, the largest of the so-called Seven Sisters, i.e. Stalin’s seven bizarre socialist-classicist secular “cathedrals”. What is interesting about the front of this monstrosity is that even today one can clearly identify high up a perfect Soviet coat of arms, along with “CCCP”(meaning, USSR)!

 

In case you travel to Moscow (free and independent travel is practically impossible in “Russia” due to a plethora of bureaucratic obstacles they deliberately put in front of you) and look for a St. Petersburg Railway Station, you’ll only find an officially so-named “Leningrad Railway Station” instead (it’s written, in cyrillic letters, on the rooftop: Leningradsky Vokzal), though former Leningrad was supposedly renamed into St. Petersburg after the “collapse” of the USSR in 1991! Also, the Oblast, i.e. the administrative area, around St. Petersburg is still officially named Leningrad Oblast. Look it up! Mind as well the Red Star on top of the station building; it is visibly lighted from within, in good old Soviet fashion, like the Red Stars on top of the five main Kremlin towers.

Moscow’s Belorussky Railway Station: It was built from 1910 to 1912, thus well before the Communist takeover in 1917. So, historical conservation can hardly be the reason why there is still, as a “leftover” from the Soviet era, a large and prominent Soviet coat of arms right on top of the main entrance; mind: in today’s allegedly no-more-communist, democratic Russia …

ll

Same with Moscow’s Yaroslavsky Railway Station, the starting point of the Trans-Siberian Railway (that leads more than 9,000 km all the way to Vladivostok on the shores of the Pacific), a building from 1902-04, designed in the style of Neorussian Revival. Yet, there is prominently displayed on the rooftop a Hammer & Sickle, along with the Soviet Union’s cyrillic acronym, “CCCP”.

l

Also in the case of Moscow’s Kazan Railway Station, built between 1913 and 1940 by Art-Nouveau- and lateron Stalinist architect Alexey Shchusev, there is an unchanged Hammer & Sickle, along with a communist five-pointed star, right above the main entrance. This is the real “Russia Today”: An unchanged Soviet Union!

l

This is the Main Railway Station of the industrial city of Kursk, some 500 km south of Moscow. As everywhere in the country, allegedly “post-Soviet Russia” has kept its fondness of Soviet-Bolshevist symbols. The inevitable question is: Why? – Coat of arms of the Soviet Union up high on the front of the station building!

l

Kremlin Towers, 150, 150

The giant communist Red Stars on top of the five main Kremlin towers have not been taken down after the Soviet Union was supposedly abolished in 1991. They are still there, still lighted from within, 24/7, by thousands of Watts. In a “post-communist” Russia??? 

 

Also, they still proudly keep their beloved Satanic Lenin Mausoleum, and only hide it once a year, for Western consumption, during their revived annual Victory Day Parade on May 9th. What was it that alleged reformer Gorbachev wrote, among other things, in 1987: “We need a Lenin who is alive!” – The USSR might just as well be perfectly intact. And it is!

l

Young Pioneers seeing Lenin, 150, 150

Young Pioneers – you read correctly, they still have their communist mass organisations, overt and covert – solemnly concluding their induction ceremony with a visit to communism’s holy of holies: the Lenin Mausoleum. The children in this picture belong to the Young Pioneers of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, led by Gennady Zyuganov, who is at excellent, even comradely terms with Vladimir Putin (as in fact they are all still Communist Party Soviet Union).  

Lenins Sarkophag, 150, 150

Inside the Mausoleum: Lenin’s dreadful corpse, periodically refurbished over a time span of meanwhile a century and apparently as fresh as a daisy. It still hasn’t been buried, and it won’t be, for obvious reasons. After all, Lenin is the founder of the Soviet state and godfather of the whole of communist world revolution! This devilish tomb, built in the 1920s and reminiscent of an ancient Egyptian or Babylonian temple, is a perfect illustration of communism being a religious cult, a religion allegedly without God, yet at its core a religion deliberately against God (which explains the insane communist hatred of religion, first and foremost of Christendom).

Stalin, Kremlin Wall necropolis, 150, 150

The “necropolis” alongside the Kremlin Wall is still in place, too. Among Dzerzhinsky, Suslov, Brezhnev, Andropov and others, is also the bust of Joseph Stalin, whose remains were removed from the mausoleum in 1961.

 

 

Gori, Stalin-Statue beim Stalin-Geburtshaus, 150, 150

Also in the supposedly independent former Soviet republic of Georgia, Stalin’s birth place at Gori is still a well-kept museum. Not even “democrat” Mikhail Saakashvili, when he was President of Georgia from 2004 till 2013, did away with it. There was some confusing back and forth, but eventually everything has stayed the same.

l

Even in the case of this much more official statue of Stalin, once placed right in front of the Gori town hall (the whole square was still named after Stalin), it took the Saakashvili era unbelievable six years to remove it as an act of “de-Stalinisation”. The whole of the “former” USSR was neither deleninised after 1991, nor had it been genuinely destalinised during the Khrushchev years. With the alleged “pro-Western” position of present-day Georgia being the same kind of illusion that was the so-called “Orange Revolution” of 2004 in Ukraine. As for the Ukrainian 2013/2014 Maidan Revolution, it eventually gave Ukraine first a chocolate oligarch (Poroshenko), followed by a comedian (Zelensky) who is said to have oligarch connections. 

Jelzin, Boris 2, 150, 150

And here is “Post-Soviet” Russia’s first “democratic” president Boris Yeltsin’s grave: What a suitable design! His job was to extract even more money from the Western countries and put them fully to sleep! What’s underneath this Russian flag? Obviously, an unchanged Soviet reality! After all, the father of democratic Russia so called (who had himself been a member of the Soviet Politbureau), passed on power to a lifelong career officer of the KGB. Very logical indeed. In his resignation speech, Yeltsin actually “apologised” for not having accomplished the intended transition “from the grey, stagnating, totalitarian past to a civilised future.” The Russian police state simply couldn’t be reformed in one sweep. Prime Minister Putin would now be the man of the hour. But Putin’s mission was definitely not to continue with “democratisation”, but initiate yet another totalitarian contraction reminiscent of Stalinism and prepare for war. The world watched and once again couldn’t see through the farce… 

Worker and Kolkhoz Woman, Moscow, 150, 150

Ever since the 1930s, Moscow has had a giant sort of socialist theme park, named since 1959 “Exhibition of Achievements of the National Economy” (only from 1992 till 2014 it was more coyly named the “All-Russia Exhibition Centre” and then renamed to its former title). It’s basically the Soviet counterpart to Disneyland, however meant not for “decadent bourgeois” distractions, but for decent socialist recreation and, first of all, “learning” (the exhibition has not been altered after the so-called collapse of the USSR), learning about the Soviet motherland’s technological progress, about the various republics and regions of the communist empire, and of course about Soviet history. So, the visitor is going to dive into a bombastic Soviet parallel universe, that for those who are bound to live in it, is tragically real nonetheless. It’s ugly to the point of revolting, also quite hilarious by its style, and it’s living proof of the monstrous totalitarianism not only of the allegedly defunkt Soviet Union, but also of the present-day “Russian Federation” – which tells us all we need to know about the seamless Soviet continuity over into “post-Soviet Russia”. The object to the left is a 1937 sculpture named “Worker and Kolkhoz Woman”. It’s of course a typical example of brutal Socialist Realism. The monstrosity was presented at the 1937 world exhibition in Paris and was then brought back to Moscow and placed at the northern entrance to the exhibition area. It was obviously meant to be a Soviet-communist perversion of America’s Statue of Liberty. And it’s still there. Even equipped with a much higher pedestal than before (now of a hundred feet and complete with a Soviet coat of arms) and perfectly refurbished under Putin over a period of six years, for the bagatelle of allegedly 90-plus million US dollars! It was solemnly again unveiled on December 4, 2009, amidst splendid fireworks. Would a genuinely post-communist, democratic Russia do such a thing? Of course not. 

Soviet monument Volgograd, 150, 150

On top of an elevation overlooking what for 300-plus years had been known as Tsaritsyn and from 1925 till 1961 was Stalingrad (then renamed to Volgograd) stands the tallest of all Soviet monuments (280 ft. in height). The 8000-ton structure “The Motherland Calls!”, that is part of a wider monument ensemble, was commissioned in the late 1950s, still under Nikita Khrushchev’s watch, and completed in 1967. It was here, in Stalingrad, that the German Wehrmacht and the Soviet Red Army in 1942/43 were at each others’ throats like nowhere else in WWII. The battle, that killed possibly a million souls, ended with the German 6th Army completely encircled and defeated. Around 100,000 German soldiers went into Soviet captivity, of whom only 5,000 were to return after the end of the war. Khrushchev at the time had been Chief Political Commissar of the Stalingrad Front and thus personally involved. So, here we have an absolutely colossal celebration of victory, unknown in its gigantism anywhere outside the sphere of totalitarianism. And the monument is still there, still celebrated and now even undergoing urgent renovation to forestall collapse. Any distancing by the “democratic” government of Russia from the Soviet-communist-Stalinist past? Nope. They are thoroughly preserving their iconic monuments from the Soviet past and are even, bit by bit, re-Stalinising the country!       

As a matter of unchanged Bolshevist course, every city and town throughout still-Soviet Russia (including many of the “former” Soviet republics) has its obligatory Lenin monuments – still! – and so well-kept and honoured as ever. Mind the Hammer and Sickle and communist star on the façade of this administrative building in far-northern Arkhangelsk that one can see in the background!

l

???????????????????

Here you have a Lenin monument in nearby Severodvinsk, Arkhangelsk Oblast. The writing on the building in the background says: “Palace of Culture of the Leninist Komsomol” (Komsomol was the communist youth organisation that, like the Communist Party, pervaded Soviet society). But today? The answer is, and there is plenty of evidence for this: the Komsomol still exists, albeit under a variety of new names! They are still indoctrinating their youth with the same old revolutionary vigour!

And here they are, to be seen in a mass turnout on December 17, 2006 in the streets of Moscow, a picture reminiscent of the “old days” of the official USSR: one of the many “post-Komsomol” youth organisations (all of them as ever socialist/communist to the core), the so-called Nashi movement, meaning “Ours!”, prior to 2005 named “Walking Together”, in fact a kind of Putin Youth, tightly organised, rigid, ideological. But, firmly within the coordinates of Marxism-Leninism, there are plenty of “alternatives”: There is the Russian Social-Democratic Union of Youth created by “social democrat” Mikhail Gorbachev (!), that is also a member of the International Union of Socialist Youth; there is the aggressively anti-Western Young Russia; a network-type organisation named Oborona (meaning, defense); the hardcore-communist Vanguard of Red Youth; the Young Guard of United Russia; the anarchical National Bolsheviks (“Nazbol”) of Eduard Limonov; the All-Union (meaning Soviet Union!) Young Guard Bolsheviks; and finally the Leninist Komsomol of the Russian Federation, that is the youth organisation of Gennady Zyuganov’s Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Welcome, everybody, to an unchanged Soviet communist reality: Many labels, one identical content!       

Even the bizarre architectural style of infamous “Stalin Gothic” is being revived: On December 20, 2003 (two days after Stalin’s 125th birthday, and precisely on “sacred” Cheka Day) there was officially opened in Moscow a so-named “Triumph Palace”. Triumph? What triumph?!!! You see: they are getting ready to force the whole world under their communist military boot!

l

Triumph Astana 2Three years later, in 2006, also in the new hybrid capital of Kazakhstan, Astana (meanwhile renamed into “Nursultan” after long-term dictator Nazarbayev’s first name), was dedicated a Stalinist highriser similarly named “Triumph Astana”. Does anybody in the West wonder why this is happening?

ll

At the same time, the duplicitous “New Russia” has built a splendid financial district in the centre of Moscow called “Moscow City”, akin to those of the City of London or of Frankfurt/Main, Germany. It’s obvious they intend to become the political and economic ruling power in the world; yet, there won’t be any free markets in this coming communist world federation, but central planning and overall enslavement only!

l

Although Russian-Orthodox churches and monasteries have been impressively renovated since the days of Gorbachev’s perestroika, and despite the Putin regime’s purported Russian-orthodox nationalism, genuine Russian Christendom was certainly not restored! The tactical deception here reminds of the one launched by Stalin during WWII when he allowed temporary religious relaxation. By the end of the day however, when communism will officially take over worldwide, all Christianity – all religion, one should say – will be crushed mercilessly! By 2019, we can already see signs of a Stalinistic cult of personality around Putin. Already, Putin statues and -busts have appeared; school children are taught to pay quasi-religious reverence to President Putin. Russia’s “god” is still the totalitarian communist state, not God Almighty!  

Vladimir Putin and the late Patriarch Alexy II, eye to eye. This is a much more accurate reflection of the true relationship between church and state in the unchanged USSR, indeed a picture worth a thousand words: the post-1917 Russian church has never been more than a secret-service-controlled puppet church. As the late Fr. Malachi Martin used to cite a Russian priest: “We have been servants of the devil for so long we have forgotten what we are.”

The height of Leninist boldness certainly is the “New Russia’s” coat of arms: A monarchical doubleheaded eagle reminiscent of Tsarist days, complete with St. George killing the dragon. This truly is reality upside down as it is precisely the unchanged Soviet Union that unchangedly represents the ultimate beast threatening to annihilate the whole of mankind. But, if one looks closely, there is a hidden continuity from Soviet times: the yellow on red ground from the former Soviet flag!l

Unchanged Aeroflot logo with Hammer & Sickle; this is a present-day Airbus-320! (Airbus, as we know, is a West-European manufacturer; but why invest in expensive research & development when one can either extract Western know-how via espionage, the old way, or simply buy the readymade product as a “civilised” customer, the new way.)

l

After the “fall” of the Soviet Union in December of 1991 it was determined that the “new” Russia also needed a new national anthem. And so a quite traditional tune by Russian composer Mikhail Glinka was chosen as the new anthem. In hindsight, however, this was only a temporary tactical ploy within the overall deception strategy, and sure enough the anthem that hardly anybody learnt by heart was again abandoned in 2000 when “Russia” entered a new, much more militaristic phase with Vladimir Putin & friends at the helm, only to be replaced again by the old Soviet anthem of 1944 composed by Alexandrov, albeit with altered lyrics – for the moment. And, guess what: those new lyrics for the 2000 version of the old Soviet anthem were written by the same Sergey Mikhalkov (1913 – 2008) who had already provided the lyrics for the original 1944 Stalin version and for the 1977 “de-Stalinised” version! What additional symbol of unbroken Soviet continuity!  The two anthems (the delusional Glinka anthem of 1992 to 2000, and the old and new Soviet anthem) can be listened to on a little YouTube presentation by this author entitled, “The ‘New Russia’ Is an Illusion!”.     

9-11 is the birthday of the founder of the Cheka, the initial Soviet secret police, Felix Dzerzhinsky, as well as the deathday of Nikita Khrushchev, the father of the new pan-communist long-range deception strategy. An interesting fact! – Also, according to Ex-FSB-agent Alexander Litvinenko, who was assassinated with Polonium-210 back in 2006, the no. 2 of Al Qaeda, Ayman al Zawahiri, was/is an old KGB/FSB agent. In other words: The Kremlin was behind 9/11, as it has always been the sole originator of terrorism worldwide! Thus it is fair to say that 9/11 opened the prelude that will ultimately lead to a communist-launched Third World War! (Also, Mohammed Atta, the lead figure of the 19 hijackers, had had close ties with the Czech intelligence servie StB, all the way back to the official communist era prior to 1989.)

For former Western Europe, the year 2004 changed everything, and so (to use one of the favourites in the communist vocabulary) quite irreversibly: The European Union, that had been so far a mere West European club (if one accepts the bloc-free and socialist-leaning countries of Sweden, Finland, and Austria as Western nations, in the first place), saw its first big enlargement deep into the still-communist East, from 15 to 25 member states. Malta and Cyprus aside, 3 “former” Soviet republics and 5 “former” communist satellites joined the EU, immediately changing the whole fabric of EU institutions, whether the European Parliament or, finally, the European Commission itself, where henceforth Western, “bourgeois” politicians resp. bureaucrats (mostly socialists themselves anyway) were to be working side by side with unchanged Marxist-Leninist nomenklaturists from Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, and Slovenia (Romania and Bulgaria were to follow in 2007; Croatia, in 2013; and the process just goes on and is of course designed to bring about a complete merger of once-Western Europe with the whole of the communist East, including the still-intact USSR, which Gorbachev and Shevardnadze thirty years ago used to term a “Common European Home from the Atlantic to Vladivostok”, that is an all-communist Eurasia; Angela Merkel sometimes uses this phrase too). For this geopolitical seismic shift to be set into legal force, a more than ominous date was chosen, presumably as an additional element of silent triumph on behalf of the communists: It wasn’t the 1st of January, or of April, or July, it was the 1st of May, the highday of international communism/socialism, when these still-communist states entered the European Union! How bold! But was there any explanation or analysis provided by the media? None! As German Foreign Minister of the day Joschka Fischer (of the Greens, a Marxist streetfighter himself back in the seventies, and still a Marxist today) met his Polish colleague at midnight in the middle of Oder bridge at Frankfurt/Oder, amidst splendid fireworks, these treacherous media kept silent as to what all of this really meant for the nations of so-far-Western Europe! Meanwhile the so-called Schengen territory was extended by some of these communist states so that the initial idea of it, namely effective border protection for the Western European nations against Eastern Europe, is gone; it’s now all an undivided, open space, where (secret-service-controlled) organised crime and what not from the East can operate completely free and unchecked, directly into the West European space. Thus, it is no exaggeration to say the (Western) European nation state is dead. -–As one further side note: Joschka Fischer, during his seven years as German Foreign Minister from 1998 till 2005, quite obviously was directly and personally responsible for the organised, yet official smuggling in of millions of East Europeans into the “Golden West” by handing out to applicants in the Ukraine, in Belarus, Moldova, Russia itself, and so forth, “tourist visa” for Germany without the slightest background checks, particularly regarding their financial capability. Given the horrendous numbers, it went indeed into the millions, it is extremely unlikely that all these people could actually afford a “journey” over into expensive Western Europe. What happened was that the German embassies in those Eastern countries were ordered by Berlin to basically grant these tourist visa without further adue. As soon as the story broke, it naturally became a huge political scandal, but Herr Fischer simply laughed at the German Bundestag while being interrogated in early 2005 for fourteen long hours, even schooling them that the days of nation-state thinking are now over anyway. Tellingly, nothing came of it, Herr Fischer is still a free man, and to this day no one knows fur sure what happened to those millions of “tourists” from brotherly Eastern Europe …   

Official and solemn Sino-Soviet “reconciliation”: Vladimir Putin and Hu Jintao establish an overt strategic alliance, very symbolically illustrated by China declaring 2006 the “Year of Russia”, followed by Russia declaring 2007 the “Year of China”! Thus, Soviet premier defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s prediction has materialised that the fake Sino-Soviet split would at some point give way to a belligerent policy of “one clenched fist” by these two communist powers, along with the whole of the rest of the communist bloc!

February 10, 2007, Munich, Germany: At the 43rd annual Munich Security Conference that always takes place at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof, that year under the motto “Global Crises – Global Responsibility”, then and from May 2012 again President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, delivered a rather unfriendly early Valentine’s Day present for his “partners” in the West: a most aggressive, threatening, and Leninistically bold speech that came as a total surprise and certainly caused a lot of headache in Western political circles as it mercilessly destroyed all illusions of an American-dominated “unipolar” world. Worse, during the whole speech Putin appeared to be almost exploding with cold fury (this author watched it live on Bavarian television; there is a full recording on the Youtube channel “PernatyZmey”). Whatever calculated Putin’s “fury” may have been, it showed more clearly than anything else during the previous years that the Russians “mean it”; mean what, unfortunately, seems still not to have been understood to this day, i.e. communist world dominion, in other words: a “unipolar” world controlled by them! Some key passages (taken from www.ag-friedensforschung.de/themen/Sicherheitskonferenz/2007-putin.html; the website gives the official English translation from the website of the President of the Russian Federation, www.president.kremlin.ru): “[…] The unipolar world that had been proposed after the Cold War did not take place either. The history of humanity certainly has gone through unipolar periods and seen aspirations to world supremacy. And what hasn’t happened in world history? However, what is a unipolar world? However one might embellish this term, at the end of the day it refers to one type of situation, namely one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making. It is a world in which there is one master, one sovereign. And at the end of the day this is pernicious not only for all those within this system, but also for the sovereign itself because it destroys itself from within. And this certainly has nothing in common with democracy. Because, as you know, democracy is the power of the majority in light of the interests and opinions of the minority. Incidentally, Russia – we – are constantly being taught about democracy. But for some reason those who teach us do not want to learn themselves. […] We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law. And independent legal norms are, as a matter of fact, coming increasingly closer to one state’s legal system. One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this? In international relations we increasingly see the desire to resolve a given question according to so-called issues of political expediency, based on the current political climate. And of course this is extremely dangerous. It results in the fact that no one feels safe. I want to emphasise this – no one feels safe! Because no one can feel that international law is like a stone wall that will protect them. Of course such a policy stimulates an arms race. […] Madam Federal Chancellor [Angela Merkel] already mentioned this. The combined GDP measured in purchasing power parity of countries such as India and China is already greater than that of the United States. And a similar calculation with the GDP of the BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – surpasses the cumulative GDP of the EU. And according to experts this gap will only increase in the future. There is no reason to doubt that the economic potential of the new centres of global economic growth will inevitably be converted into political influence and will strengthen multipolarity. […] Did not our country have a peaceful transition to democracy? Indeed, we witnessed a peaceful transformation of the Soviet regime – a peaceful transformation! And what a regime! With what a number of weapons, including nuclear weapons! Why should we start bombing and shooting now at every available opportunity? Is it the case when without the threat of mutual destruction we do not have enough political culture, respect for democratic values and for the law? […] Plans to expand certain elements of the anti-missile defence system to Europe cannot help but disturb us. Who needs the next step of what would be, in this case, an inevitable arms race? I deeply doubt that Europeans themselves do. Missile weapons with a range of about five to eight thousand kilometres that really pose a threat to Europe do not exist in any of the so-called problem countries. And in the near future and prospects, this will not happen and is not even foreseeable. And any hypothetical launch of, for example, a North Korean rocket to American territory through Western Europe obviously contradicts the laws of ballistics. As we say in Russia, it would be like using the right hand to reach the left ear. […] But what is happening at the same time? Simultaneously the so-called flexible frontline American bases with up to five thousand men in each. It turns out that NATO has put its frontline forces on our borders, and we continue to strictly fulfil the treaty [on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe] obligations and do not react to these actions at all. I think that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernisation of the Alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances our Western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are those declarations today? No one even remembers them. But I will allow myself to remind this audience what was said. I would like to quote the speech of NATO General Secretary Mr Woerner in Brussels on 17 May 1990. He said at the time that “the fact that we are ready not to place a NATO army outside of German territory gives the Soviet Union a firm security guarantee”. Where are these guarantees? The stones and concrete blocks of the Berlin Wall have long been distributed as souvenirs. But we should not forget that the fall of the Berlin Wall was possible thanks to a historic choice – one that was also made by our people, the people of Russia – a choice in favour of democracy, freedom, openness and a sincere partnership with all the members of the big European family. And now they are trying to impose new dividing lines and walls on us – these walls may be virtual but they are nevertheless dividing, ones that cut through our continent. And is it possible that we will once again require many years and decades, as well as several generations of politicians, to dissemble and dismantle these new walls? […] In conclusion I would like to note the following. We very often – and personally, I very often – hear appeals by our partners, including our European partners, to the effect that Russia should play an increasingly active role in world affairs. In connection with this I would allow myself to make one small remark. It is hardly necessary to incite us to do so. Russia is a country with a history that spans more than a thousand years and has practically always used the privilege to carry out an independent foreign policy. We are not going to change this tradition today. At the same time, we are well aware of how the world has changed and we have a realistic sense of our own opportunities and potential. And of course we would like to interact with responsible and independent partners with whom we could work together in constructing a fair and democratic world order that would ensure security and prosperity not only for a select few, but for all.” That latter statement, “a fair and democratic world order that would ensure security and prosperity not only for a select few, but for all”, shows without doubt they’re indeed still headed for world communism. In these extracts one can see as clear as the blue sky that the unchanged Soviets will do everything to manoeuvre American military presence out from the European continent, engage the Europeans in an ever tighter cooperation in all spheres that would finally mean a merger between the EU and the so-called Russian Federation, on communist terms, and leave the U.S. in complete political and military isolation. Given Putin’s mentioning of the growing economic and political power of Brazil, Russia, India and China (the so-called BRIC states, meanwhile extended by South Africa into BRICS: indeed bricks in their ever rising all-communist world architecture), one can see coming on the horizon what Stalin once said had to be achieved: the change of the encirclement of socialism by capitalism to the encirclement of capitalism by socialism. Putin’s speech was an open demonstration of unchanged Soviet hatred against the one great obstacle on their way to an all-communist world, the United States of America. And the psychological effect on quite a number of Western politicians seems indeed to have been devastating.

Oddly, just hours after this “game-changing” speech by Putin in Munich, Germany, another major event – equally relevant to the world revolution – took place on that same February 10, 2007 at Springfield, Illinois, where far-left U.S. Democratic Senator Barack Hussein Obama announced his running for the office of President of the United States, and so on an ominously freezing-cold Illinois winter day, already speaking of his intention to “transform” America. The location of the old Springfield State Capitol Building had been chosen deliberately, as it was here, in the former capital of the state of Illinois, that Abraham Lincoln, later to be the President who finally did away with slavery, gave his famous June 1858 “House Divided” speech that summed up the pre-Civil War crisis of the American Union. So typical of the boldness of the revolutionary hard left, they adopted Abraham Lincoln as their icon for an aggressive anti-white black racism that has had nothing to do with unifying and everything to do with division and polarisation. And look where the country stands today: it has truly become a house divided – which is what Alinsky-style “community organising” is all about: create conflict and seize power (and should you “lose” power again, go berserk and obstruct the new admininstration no matter what).    

Nov. 9, 2009, Berlin, twentieth anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall, actually a perfidious celebration on the part of the communists: Ahead of the various official commemoration events there was a highly symbolical occurrence much less covered by the media, namely an all-East-German/communist crossing of a bridge from former East Berlin into former West Berlin, a bridge ironically named by the East German communist regime in the 1950s “Bösebrücke” after a German communist “martyr” who had died in Hitlers’ concentration camp machine. Also, this was the first border crossing to be opened by the East German authorities on that supposedly so historic evening of November 9, 1989. The irony is that “Böse”, understood as an adjective, means “evil”! The further symbolism of it was that German Chancellor Angela Merkel, herself a “former” East-German Marxist-Leninist, could be seen marching in the most cheerful Mayday mood, flanked by her fellow East-German communists, chanconnier Wolf Biermann and later-to-be German State President Joachim Gauck (for whom to get elected for that post it was necessary to chase out resp. character-assassinate two predecessors in that office of formal head of state). Interestingly, also fake Polish trade union leader Lech Wałęsa and fake Russian reformer Mikhail Gorbachev took part in that solemn reenacted communist invasion, so to speak. The message was quite clear: “We won, and soon the whole world is going to be ours!”

Were Angela Merkel and Lech Wałęsa genuine anti-communists – and we can assume that either way they are well aware of the real nature of the “changes” in the communist bloc of 1989/91 and ever since – they would certainly never ever pose together with the Soviet chief ideologue and spearhead of the world revolution, Mikhail Gorbachev! But instead, what we see in this scene is the most fraternal, almost conspiratorial calm imaginable. They have been, and still are, involved in one and the same project: pushing forward the cause of world communism to the point of global dominion. Wałęsa was merely being set up by the Polish communist structures as a “charismatic” union leader; whilst Merkel – just like Obama in the United States – is the perfect communist Trojan horse placed right within the enemy’s camp! Leaves us with very little hope regarding the survival of the free world, except for the possibility of Divine intervention …

What we have in front of us here is an all-leftist congregation celebrating the success of their longterm communist strategy; staffed, beside Gorbachev and Merkel, with people from present Germany’s far-left party “Die Linke” (i.e. “The Left”), that is an almost one-to-one continuation of the old communist GDR’s “Socialist Unity Party of Germany” (SED). Mind also the strangely altered German flag – one is immediately reminded of the flag of the old GDR, and rightly so – showing that infamous 1959 “socialist-pacifist” monument by Soviet sculptor Jevgeny Vuchetich that is placed next to the UN-headquarters in New York, accompanied by the deceptive socialist battle-cry stolen from the Holy Bible, “Schwerter zu Pflugscharen!”, i.e. “Swords to Ploughshares!” Wait for this: This was the exact symbol of communist East Germany’s “semi-official” peace movement that was started around 1980! Regarding Angela Merkel, her CV prior to the “collapse” of communism of 1989 has been widely deleted. However, what is known for sure is that her streamlined version of a childhood in a conservative and pious family in the midst of a hostile communist environment is a lie (her father, Horst Kasner, a Lutheran pastor, had deliberately moved from Hamburg, West Germany, to the “workers’ paradise” in the East just before Angela Merkel’s birth in July 1954, precisely because of a great sympathy of his for socialism, and quickly climbed the ladder in the GDR’s state-controlled church structures, soon to be notorious as the “Red Kasner”). In other words, young Angela grew up right in the middle of the party- and state elite. She was a determined young communist, excelled in the (mandatory) studying of the Russian language, and was later – beside studying Physics resp. beside working as a graduated Physicist at the Academy of Sciences – a secretary for agitation and propaganda in the communist youth organisation, “Freie Deutsche Jugend” (i.e., “Free Youth of Germany”). So, whatever the West Germans have embraced her as their “Mutti” (Mummy), she is definitely not working in the interest of what once was West Germany, but in the interest of world communism (and given Germany’s leading role in the European Union, this tells us all about the EU’s strategic orientation, that is solely directed towards Moscow; former President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, by the way, was “once” in his student years a Maoist student leader). What has been recognised, though, is Merkel’s completely secretive and strangely stoic style, by which nothing ever “sticks”: thus, she was nicknamed “Teflon Chancellor”. Of course there’s much to hide on her part as the only thing she visibly has at her heart is the communist agenda. The West Germans (as well as all the other West Europeans) must not discover this “little secret” before it’s all said and done.    

The culmination of those 20-year-celebrations, already at night, too turned out to be a more than ominous spectacle. There were arranged, along the course where once that dreadful Berlin Wall had divided the city, a thousand dominoes made of polysterene foam and painted on by school children as well as signed by such Marxist celebrities as Nelson Mandela, for one example, and those dominoes, set up vertical in standstill, were to be kicked over and fall in a closed circle all around (which, because of the heavy rain, did not happen: the dominoes stopped halfway). The symbolism here, at least for those aware of the history of the Cold War, is obvious: It was a blatant and triumphant allusion to President Eisenhower’s so-called domino theory, mainly applied to Southeast Asia, that saw the communist expansionist policy as a continuous falling, one after another, of dominoes, meaning of yet-non-communist countries under the communist yoke, which was to be forestalled by the counter-strategy, if one can call it that, of “Containment”! Now, to have that symbolism depicting the danger of communist expansion used in a celebration allegedly commemorating the “fall of communism”, is more than cynical and shows who is at work not just in the choreography of such events but in the overall geopolitics of Europe! 

November 8, 2010, off the coast of Los Angeles: A mysterious missile launch some 35 miles off the Southern Californian coast resulted in widespread uncertainty and confusion. All DoD entities positively confirmed there had been no missile test. At the same time, the Pentagon ruled out that it could have been a missile launch by a foreign power, coming up with the ridiculous explanation it must have been an airliner or a “toy rocket”. Yet, former U.S. Ambassador to NATO as well as former Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Ellsworth identified the projectile as “a big missile.” Also, retired U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Tom McInerney’s assessment was, “Look, this is not an airplane because of the plume, and the way you see that plume. Airplanes do not con at sea level or 5,000 feet like that. I spent 35 years flying fighters, and I never saw an airplane con like that. That is a missile, it’s launched from a submarine, and you can see it go through a correction course, and then it gets on a very smooth trajectory, meaning that the guidance system is now kicked in, it’s going at about 45° away from you, that’s why you are not seeing a lot of vertical velocity.” Could it have been a Chinese or (Soviet)-Russian missile fired from one of their super-quiet submarines?

Four years earlier, on October 26, 2006, occurred an incident of similiarly catastrophic implications: During a U.S. Navy exercise in the East China Sea, between Japan and Taiwan, suddenly and surprisedly a Chinese Song-class attack submarine surfaced within nine miles, i.e. within torpedoing distance, of the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk. None of the whole number of escorting ships of the compound (that must have included also submarines) had been aware of the presence of the Chinese submarine prior to its surfacing! The incident naturally caused great shock (not to speak of embarrassment) in American military circles as it revealed a degree of sophistication of China’s submarine fleet that had neither been known nor expected. The consequences from this new reality are far-reaching: the Navies of the West might now well be rendered useless and defenceless against Chinese (and certainly Russian) submarine approaches and attacks. Asked by American diplomats why the submarine had been shadowing the U.S. fleet, Beijing pretended ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidental.

On February 27, 2012, at the “birthplace” of the first Soviet atomic bomb, Sarov, the (Soviet-)Russian state and military elite held “roundtable” defense talks (which underlines that nuclear war for the Soviet strategists is not a theoretical option, but the very backbone of their WWIII military planning). Vladimir Putin, holding the office of Prime Minister at the time, made i.a. the following eye-opening remarks that show that the communist bloc has indeed successfully swung the balance of military power in its favour (to be checked out in a brief live recording on YouTube, starting at 0:34): “We have more aces up our sleeve that would push our Western colleagues and partners to a more constructive dialogue than we have seen before. What do I mean by this? Just a few years ago, as I know, they used to speak of us among their fellow allies as follows: ‘Russia could tinker with its military as much as it wants, we are not the least interested in what’s happening there. All they have is rusted-out junk.’ But this is not true. [Laughs] Today, it’s a different game.” In other words, the West, having naïvely fallen during the last 30 years for the calculated disinformation projected by “Russia” regarding an allegedly run-down Russian military, is now being laughed at for its stupidity. Still-communist Russia and communist China, along with their numerous allies around the world, now represent a combined military power so great and formidable that it can easily face down and defeat the West. Also, note the insidious expression that these aces Russia’s got up its sleeve (read: achieved military superiority) will push the West to a “more constructive dialogue” than before: in plain English, this foreshadows a scenario of military blackmail that will force the so-far-non-communist world to accept global communist tyranny!         

May 9th, 2012, Moscow, Red Square: Since 2005, a supposedly “post-Soviet” Russia has again gradually reintroduced its highly ideologically charged annual Victory Day Parades on May 9th, “commemorating” the USSR’s victory over Nazi Germany in what is still being termed today in Stalinist fashion “the Great Patriotic War”, but of course at the same time anticipating total victory for world communism around the globe!

ll

These pompous Victory Day military parades and commemorations, however, aren’t just held in what is now the “Russian Federation” as of course all “former” Soviet republics still share this same, unchanged Soviet-communist bloodstream. Here you can see an event on May 9, 2006 in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Note the demonic atmosphere that’s over the scene; it’s the very demonism that has been characteristic of the whole Leninist state right since 1917 (Romanian pastor Richard Wurmbrand, for many years imprisoned and tortured by the Romanian communist regime, indeed equalled communism to “collective demonic possession”; that’s what it is; that’s what’s to be expected in the so-far-non-communist world).   

Also, “democratic Russia” has again adopted (resp. never let go of, in the first place) the Red Star as the emblem for its armed forces. However, also here one can find a little trick applied, namely this present Red Star shows a fine blue-white margin, citing the colours of the new Russian Tricolour. As a consequence, this “new” Red Star looks slightly less frightening than the old one!

l

Furthermore, the official military salute in both Russia’s armed forces and the militia is still – believe it or not – the same old communist way of address, namely e.g. “Tovarishch General!”, thus “Comrade General!”. Any explanation for that? -–In this picture, by the way, one can see present Russian Defence Minister, Sergey Shoygu. After five years of a civilian being in charge from 2007 till 2012, now again a General of the Army is heading the Ministry. He might well be the one to lead the unchanged Soviet Union, along with communist China and the rest of the communist bloc,  into an all-out World War against the West. 

As one examines the medals on General Shoygu’s uniform in the picture above, one can see on top of them all a quite peculiar award in the shape of a five-pointed star, as in Soviet times, that is supposed to be the order “Hero of the Russian Federation”. However, that very same medal, just with a plain red ribbon, once was the order “Hero of the Soviet Union”! It’s almost childish how they “changed” things solely on the surface. The reality, the substance underneath, however, hasn’t changed at all!

Ironically, in this photograph one can see the first Defence Minister of the “new Russia”, Pavel Grachev (in office from May 1992 till June 1996) as late as 1994, meaning three years into the alleged post-Soviet era, still with the old-style medal, “Hero of the Soviet Union”, although there’s at the same time the new Russian tricolour flag on his arm. Just think about it for a minute: No lesser a man than the Minister of Defence publicly wearing this allegedly outdated prominent Soviet medal more than two years after the alleged collapse of Soviet communism! This detail alone shows with staggering clarity that the “change” was only cosmetic and only for Western consumption …

At the 2010 Victory Day Parade on Red Square, the still-Soviet propagandists achieved a tremendous coup reminiscent of the one by Hitler and Genossen at the opening of the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin: This time, troops from the WWII Western allies, United States, Britain, and France were marching over Red Square, and they did so to Soviet military music. What symbolism!

l

lBut despite Western troops participating in this Soviet “commemoration” event, there hadn’t come one single political representative from either the U.S., Britain, or France: those Western troops were marching basically abandoned by their own heads of state. As a consequence, the only two Western guests (if one can call them that) were Germany’s (ex-GDR-)Chancellor Angela Merkel (which shows where Germany stands) and Israel’s State President at the time, socialist Shimon Peres. For “communists only”…

During the European Football Championship of 2012, jointly carried out by Poland and Ukraine, the game Poland vs. Russia on June 12, 2012, that took place in Warsaw’s National Stadium, was accompanied by this rather unfriendly gesture, if not to say: threat of war and terror, on the part of Russian “football fans”, not just against their still-communist-satellite Poland, but even more so against the West! What a straight-forward depiction of the true nature of the beast of Soviet communism! And what a truthful depiction also of who rules Russia: the Communist Party’s “Sword and Shield”, which is the KGB (now renamed to FSB and SVR, respectively). And let’s keep in mind: Only two years earlier, the whole so-called conservative Polish leadership around President Lech Kaczinsky died in a highly suspicious “plane crash”, ironically as they were about to visit the Katyn forest near Smolensk, Russia, where in the summer of 1940, with the eastern part of Poland occupied by Stalin, the Red Army had massacred some 22,000 Polish military officers. The diabolical cynicism of today’s Russia’s ruling oligarchy (that is still the old communist nomenklatura represented by younger faces) is just beyond belief! And around the playing field – what an irony in addition! – one can read those idiotic slogans of political correctness, “Respect” and “Say No to Racism”, that only serve to mentally and factually paralyse the populations of the West, but have no place in the communist world, where the “party line” has long since been firmly established anyway.

Two months after the inauguration of America’s first Stalinist President, head of the de-facto Comintern (a.k.a. the Gorbachev Foundation), Mikhail Gorbachev, pays a visit to the White House’s West Wing on March 20, 2009, cheering and laughing along with his fellow Marxist comrades Obama and Biden. This is where the United States of America has reached: a Soviet state of affairs.

 

Probably the most devastating humiliation and ridicule of the United States and what’s left of the Western world was the one by Comrade Gorbachev himself (who has by now completely dropped his former “friendly” mask) of December 10, 2011, when he gave in Munich, Germany, a bizarre “acceptance speech”, having received from the conservative Hanns Seidel Foundation their prestigious Franz Josef Strauß Award. The speech was that brutal (and chock-a-block full with the weirdest propaganda lies) that the mainstream media of Germany and elsewhere must have decided to not discuss its content at all. Only Bavarian Television aired the event once, late at night on that same day, and never again. In other words, the speech was more or less swept under the rug, with most of the world’s public never hearing about it. This author just incidently came across it via a YouTube piece that had part of the speech as a TV-recording, and then sat down and translated the Russian-to-German simultaneous interpretation into English. Months later he found a greatly streamlined print version of the whole speech on the website of the Hanns Seidel Foundation, the manuscript having been prepared by Gorbachev’s staff. This speech contains everything Soviet top defector Anatoliy Golitsyn had warned of: the communists, as soon as their longterm deception would have paid them sufficient dividends in terms of economic and military strength, would drop their nice and friendly mask of reform and cooperation and instead would adopt a very different attitude, namely that of open blackmail and threat against the West. And now, as the world is caught in the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression, the communists are eager to exploit this in order to finally achieve their long-desired world victory for communism. Also, this speech reveals with full clarity the “special” relationship between the unchanged Soviets and Germany. These two powers, one mainly military, the other mainly economic, work hand-in-glove for the moment, but finally are deadly rivals. Yet, the Germans obviously underestimate the argument of thermo-nuclear war that could any time turn them, along with their whole so-far-German-dominated European Union, into a complacent vassal of Sino-Soviet-led world communism. Here is the key passage, in fact about the full second half, from that dreadful Gorbachev-speech, that you can read in full in chapter 6 of this author’s treatise, “‘Forward, Comrades! Not Back!’ – America and the World on the Brink of Global Communism”:

[…] “But now I’m also slowly asking myself: what’s this all about? For, what we can see is that the missile defence is meant as a defence against Russia. Everything else is just talk, or a wall of fog to cover the truth. Yes, and as a result, the Russian government said: We’re going to station means of defence, here and there, and we are ready to use weapons that guarantee our security. What does this mean? WORLD WAR III! And if Russia and the USA should again be at loggerheads, this IS World War III! This won’t be restricted to a local war! And we need to again clearly remember the lesson, you know: the Cold War was over; our partners were triumphing, and they wouldn’t see the forest for the trees any more, in the West, and especially in the USA. They wanted to build a new empire, with a super-super-super-power – to which I say: the Germans are a serious and reflecting nation, and they know well what is being said in the USA; and when they don’t react to it and sometimes nod, it means all this can’t be taken for serious: It’s the attempt to threaten Russia a bit; and there is still in Europe a bit of fear left towards Russia. Yet, we only wish to build and develop: No one has led more wars in the 20th century than us. So much we had to suffer, and, just as a sidenote: We had no plans after WWII to start military action against the USA. I know it. I MUST know it. And, suddenly, all this starts all over again. This reminds me of those 200 or 300 US bases, spread all over the world, from the Cold War era; and have they been of any use to anybody? I have the impression that the evildoer of the system in which the West lives, and so with the consent of Washington, this radical market philosophy, all this hasn’t turned out positively. What have we got? Bubbles! One bubble after another, and they all burst. And, one should understand at last that the solution can’t be an arms race, the militarisation of the world and the economy, because we’d keep on throwing money out the window. And former Finance Minister Waigel spoke of 10 billion DM or Dollar, of course it was Mark, Deutschmark, that he didn’t give to Gorbachev at that time. How much money are we simply throwing out the window! Eisenhower is again quoted these days, General and President Eisenhower. Yesterday I had again the idea to watch that movie: “FFF” — No — “JFK”. On the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. I like such films, and one should watch them from time to time just so to remain awake; if possible: wide-awake! And, Eisenhower, to come back to that, said that the military-industrial complex is a dangerous thing; and one should never lose control over it! He said that in a way as had never been said before. And I want to say: the man was right! [Applause] The military-industrial complex in our grand countries, that’s those who set the tone, who exert pressure on politics. I know how our military-industrial complex is doing this, and it is still very critical of Gorbachev because of perestroika and the freeing of the country from these military expenditures. But, these people have been accustomed to always “play the first fiddle”, and I think that if an economy cannot provide for its people, it is an ill economy; AND SUCH AN ECONOMY MUST BE CURED, AND SO BY RADICAL MEANS! This was my idea, this was my approach. And I’m still repeating it today. But, no, what are they telling people? They are telling them things that make them afraid. Well, and now they’re arming up. But when one looks at the situation thoroughly, one can easily see that our government is acting correctly and appropriately, because – I just say: the devil take it – there is no system for executing global decisions in a world that is already global. We simply still lack such mechanisms, and I have heard with great interest that, as has been said by your Prime Minister, “we are ready to help, but not to throw money into a bottomless pit.” After all, IT WAS THE GERMANS who initiated the Euro, the European single currency, and therefore Germany carries also great responsibility, and Germany is big and strong, and thus carries an especially great responsibility, from which it cannot just steal away. But, this is also about the processes within the countries. Many have entered the EU in an expectation of having things for free, I think you know exactly what I mean. Yes, so quickly did they rush to the West and left the Warsaw Pact and COMECON, all up and away towards the West, and the West immediately welcomed them and quickly incorporated these new countries, which all entered suit the United Nations; and you yourselves have greatly furthered this development. Thus, look who is talking! And, shouldn’t one be grateful to the Greeks for having established the fundaments of our civilisation? [Laughter and applause] But, well, I believe we know exactly what we need to think of each other, and we must build a system for executing global decisions in a global world. And for this, NEW systems, NEW models are needed! Betting on super-profits, super-consumption, and the like, leads nowhere. That’s of no use! Now, we have a billionaire who owns a submarine. And now he wants to commission a second one. Is this going to give the man happiness? No! One should find a small submarine, torpedo his first one so to prevent the second one from being built; because no one needs this. Who needs this? And I ask you, my dear Germans: stand you also by your responsibility! You have initiated the Euro zone, and as soon as the control mechanisms become effective [i.e., as soon as all remaining national sovereignty of the individual member state is fully done away with, as is happening right now], this system will be precisely what Europe and the world need! [Applause] I think we should all really think about, together, how we can prevent a violent solution of the problems at hand, because when someone chooses force, this is the most dangerous thing that there is; and I repeat: we’re again in an arms race! It’s obviously about re-militarisation, not only militarisation of the economy, but also of consciousness. WE ARE ILL. WE ALL NEED TO BE TREATED AND CURED! And Generals again become heroes. Generals who believe they had disarmed too much, one missile of many thousands, that’s too much. And here I ask myself: How do the Generals think? If one bets on solving problems militarily, then one commits a mistake, and I’d like to say this again, I’ve heard this, we just had in France an annual meeting, the annual Conference of the World Political Forum, that I brought into being several years ago, really a serious organisation; there it was said: To bet on force and strength isn’t efficient. The nations, and most politicians, condemn such an attitude. And at the end we came to the conclusion that wars do not solve problems, and in earlier days thinkers said that war is necessary, that war brings about a movement ahead etc. No! War means a giant failure of politics. For what should one take up arms, aeroplanes, extremely destructive weapons? And why? Because the politicians got it wrong, because the politicians still lag behind the fast changes in the world. And, so to speak, the Russians, the Germans, the French, the Americans, the Japanese, and now also the Chinese, by the way, these nations are responsible for providing for the world a peaceful, positive perspective. And, also, it’s definitely wrong to believe one could hide away, one could sit out anything. No one can hide any more or sit anything out! Also small countries need contacts. I believe I have now strayed quite far from the Franz-Josef-Strauß Award [cynical laughter], but I’m convinced that the one is closely connected to the other; connected to the legacy passed on to us by smart brains. I’d like to once again express my heartfelt thanks. You know, I speak at home, here in Germany, in Europe, in the world. I advocate cooperation and of course a deepening in the cooperation between Russia and Germany. Because, this means very, very much for the overall situation. It stabilises it, develops it towards a positive outcome, and the people who are demonstrating in Wall Street demand social justice and equality. And, as you can see, also in the EU, mistakes were made. But this isn’t yet the essential point I want to make. I have the impression that – of course we aren’t out of the old crisis yet, and there are already signs on the horizon for a new crisis, but – as LENIN calmed his comrades-in-arms, this was when the Soviet power came into being, when there was a chaotic situation in the country: “Yes, of course we have chaos, BUT FROM CHAOS SPRING UP NEW FORMS OF LIFE“. And therefore, chaos IS a problem, a crisis IS a problem, all this isn’t easy, but there are always included opportunities that definitely should be made use of. And I wish the Germans a healthy New Year. And this time you will still have enough bratwursts and pork-knuckles for New Year’s Eve [laughter; yet, one can be sure not one single German was laughing]. WELL, AND AS FOR THE NEXT NEW YEAR’S EVE, WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT THAT, TOGETHER! And, I tell you quite frankly: it is for me a special, an emotional day. And regarding the accomplishments that I myself associate with my life – the German question, the destiny of Germany – these were for me of determining importance. And I’m proud of what I could do. Thank you very much! I’m wishing you good success!”

Remember the summer of 1989, when East German “refugees” had gathered at the Hungarian-Austrian border, eager to be allowed into freedom? Well, some 20 years later, supposedly post-communist Hungary erected on that spot an aggressive socialist-realist propaganda monument entitled “Umbruch”, i.e. approx. “radical change”. What a bold illustration of what really happened: it was the beginning of a brutal overall communist invasion, by “peaceful” means; and the West – completely ignorant about the communist bloc’s well-hidden intentions – was cheering like crazy. Funny enough, that monument is also entitled by the Hungarian word “Áttörés”, which doesn’t correspond with the meaning of “Umbruch” at all, as it means BREAKTHROUGH (as in, e.g., military breakthrough), rather than change…

Meanwhile this socialist-realist style has even established itself in the United States, and so most prominently next to the National Mall in Washington D.C.: In August of 2011, a monstrous 30-foot-monument was erected, that was sculpted by an artist from communist Red China and depicting “civil rights leader”, but de facto communist, Martin Luther King Jr. The America under Barack Obama already marked a transition phase towards fullblown communism itself, rendering the entire rest of the world an easy prey to communist takeover!l

And, talking about insidious monuments communicating insidious messages: Here is the gravestone of Nikita Khrushchev, under whose auspices the longrange deception strategy towards global communist triumph was formulated. Khrushchev “fell” in 1964, was living ever after under “house arrest” and died in 1971, being denied a state funeral. This tombstone was then placed on his grave in 1974. What a symbol for their deadly, black & white, dialectical method of lies and deceit! Also, September 11, 2001, happened to be not only Felix Dzerzhinsky’s 124th birthday, but also Khrushchev’s 30th deathday.

 

 

*       *       * 

l

Anybody still in denial, despite the evidence presented above, is most welcome to read the well-researched articles by this same author. They give all the background in meticulous detail, complete with all the first-class sources relevant to the topic.

 l

l

 

© The Contemplative Observer 2013/2019