“Once a Decisive Majority Believes in Global Warming, Capitalism Is Finished.”

 

The Emperor's New Clothes

 

The headline is a quote from an April 2015 article titled “Green Is the New Red” by U.S. geopolitical analyst J. R. Nyquist. Oh yes indeed, science has been replaced (not for the first time in history) by pseudo-science, rational thinking by emotion, and objective truth by yet another incarnation of the Great Lie. To declare a thing real or not real, the established methodical process of verification or falsification is no longer needed. Instead, a mere “democratic majority” (whatever ignorant or deluded), a societal “consensus”, suffices to determine what is the case and what isn’t. To hell with all those petty, old-fashioned concerns and calls for irrefutable proof! After all, reality is fluid, and everything is part of a process of evolution anyway. If virtually everybody “knows” from deep within that something is true (because it just feels so true), how can it ever be otherwise?

We are on an ultra-dangerous path into yet another era of complete totalitarianism. Truth (whether scientific or spiritual) doesn’t count anymore. We believe – with our guts – in the sacred well-being of, above all, trees and animals, in “carbon foot-prints” and an “impending climate apocalypse”, which can only be averted by immediate drastic measures on a global scale. Man has caused, by his industrialised civilisation, a near-irreversible heating of the earth, we’re told. And so he needs to be stopped, by whatever means necessary. If he has to adopt a stone-age-type of existence, so be it. If a certain percentage of the world population has to go, let them go. Doesn’t this remind us of the great mass killers in history, of the terrible likes of Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao or Pol Pot?

l

And what about the scientific credentials of those who propagate this now-fashionable idea of “anthropogenic global warming” (that is certainly no “theory” in the scientific sense, not even an hypothesis)? Could it be that these people are not so much authorities in the field, but pursuing a perfidious and destructive agenda (dressed up as “science”, but being in fact a monstrous ideological cult) to kill off not only wealth and prosperity, but any and every aspect of freedom and individual choice, to begin with? And hasn’t this climate change bandwagon all the hallmarks of an aggressive revolutionary movement, that cleverly links unfounded claims about the earth’s atmosphere with all-out socialist/communist demands to radically restructure society? Please, watch British Channel 4’s groundbreaking documentary of 2007, The Great Global Warming Swindle, and watch it to the end, before you continue reading:

 

So, let’s summarise the major proponents – whether individuals or organisations – of this new climate change “orthodoxy”, that one-sidedly and dictatorially (as well as ridiculously) mandates, “The science is settled; the debate is over”:

(1) Al Gore. Albert Arnold Gore Jr., “left-of-centre moderate” Vice President of the United States under President Bill Clinton from 1993 through 2001, the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate in the 2000 U.S. Presidential elections and Nobel Peace Prize laureate of 2007, together with the UN’s IPCC, “for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change”, is no scientist, in whatever field. “Earth balancer” and “inconvenient truther” Al Gore is merely a politician and a political progagandist. More precisely, like all “Greens”, he is in fact a Marxist radical, in the guise of a “well-meaning environmentalist” and establishment Democrat. His New-Age-flavoured “climate activism” is simply designed to bring down the U.S. (in fact, any Western) economy as thoroughly as possible. And wasn’t his family (and wasn’t Al Gore himself) closely linked to and supported by the late Occidental Petroleum chairman and Soviet agent Armand Hammer?

(2) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC was founded within the framework of the United Nations in November of 1988 as an outgrowth, more or less, of the 1985-established Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases. The timing is significant, as this was the height of Gorbachev’s deceptive perestroika campaign. By “perestroika” – engl., restructuring – the communist world meant the restructuring (in Obama-speak, “fundamental transformation”) not of itself, but of the West, which duly came to pass. It is important to realise that the IPCC, though it has been sold to the public as a scientific institute, is in fact a mere political body, to be more precise: like all UN-affiliated organisations, an instrument for the Revolution. Take the IPCC’s chairman from 2002 to 2015, Rajendra Pachauri. The man has no clue whatsoever about climate science; in fact, he is a railroad engineer! He backed his organisation’s deliberate scientific “misconduct” (read: forgeries) designed to dupe the world into believing in a fairy-tale called “anthropogenic global warming”. Also Pachauri’s predecessors Robert Watson (United Kingdom) and Bert Bolin (Sweden), though from the field, had been acting rather as rabid propagandists than scientists, pushing forward an ever-more-monstrous eco-totalitarian agenda that they based on the never-proved (in fact, long-disproved) assumption of human CO2 emissions causing the earth’s climate to spin out of control. From the 1992 Earth Summit at Rio de Janeiro to the 1997 Kyoto Protocols to the 2015 Paris Climate Accord, the only thing that has grown exponentially has been an ever-wilder hysteria (so typical of revolutionary movements) that, by now, doesn’t take a no any more. “Climate sceptics”, who are even termed “heretics”, are being threatened and intimidated, while the majority of politicians and corporate leaders have been persuaded of the reality of “climate change” and have given up their resistance to the radical demands of the “climate protectionists”. Our youth, from kindergarten to university, has meanwhile been indoctrinated in the new religion of “climate change” for easily 25 years. Let’s get out of nuclear energy as well as oil and gas and switch to solar- and wind energy! Let’s prohibit all privately owned cars and restrict aerial transport to those who really need it, which is us! Let’s make veganism mandatory (at least, for the masses)! Let’s massively de-industrialise our economies and create a much more livable world guided by a new, fashionable primitivist tribalism! Let’s take (whatever is left) from the rich countries and give it to those once known as “developing countries”, whom we have forbidden to develop, without actually lifting them up out of their poverty. It’s the perfect recipe for an Orwellian – worse: Huxleyan – police communism, where to question the guidelines coming out of the United Nations (or, ultimately, out of Moscow and Beijing) qualifies for insanity!

(3) Mikhail Gorbachev. The uninformed reader may be perplexed: What, in the world, does this wonderful, wonderful man, who brought down communism in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, have to do with eco-communism? Two severe flaws with such an objection: First, Gorbachev isn’t a “wonderful man”, but has been and will be to his last breath a die-hard Marxist-Leninist. Secondly, his function was precisely to choreograph a fake collapse of communism in order to deceive and put to sleep the West and prepare it for convergence with the communist world, on communist terms. And isn’t it interesting that he founded, in 1993, an environmental organisation by name of Green Cross International? Obviously, the “post”-Soviets were very much interested in getting the global warming charade going in the countries of the West. Already in Gorbachev’s programmatic (and quite revealing) book of 1987, Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World, we can read the following (taken from page 137):

But the Soviet Union alone cannot resolve all these issues. And we are not ashamed to repeat this, calling for international cooperation. We say with full responsibility, casting away the false considerations of “prestige,” that all of us in the present-day world are coming to depend more and more on one another and are becoming increasingly necessary to one another. And since such realities exist in the world and since we know that we in this world are, on the whole, now linked by the same destiny, that we live on the same planet, use its resources and see that they are not limitless and need to be saved, and nature and the environment need to be conserved, then such a reality holds for all of us. The necessity of effective, fair, international procedures and mechanisms which would ensure rational utilization of our planet’s resources as the property of all mankind becomes ever more pressing.

The Soviet deceivers’ main argument, in general, was interdependence. The world’s problems, in whatever field, can’t be solved by individual nation states any more; hence, the need for ever-closer cooperation. In part, like with the international crime epidemic, they themselves created those problems; in other fields, like with the revolutionary sorcerer’s wand of “global warming”, they invented them. The West should never ever have reacted to those deceptive invitations and should have left the communist world to stew in its own juice until a real break with communism and real decommunisation would have taken place!

(4) The Green political parties. It should be mentioned at first that environmental protection, forest conservation, the creation of national parks etc. had been around at least for a century before the crazed and drug-ridden 60s’ radicals, mainly in the latter half of the seventies, suddenly discovered their own affinity with Rousseauan nature romanticism, or so it seemed, and a new cult of smallness and primitiveness, which they made greatly fashionable. However, if one takes a more thorough look at the various protagonists in these parties – and most blatantly in Germany – one can see that just a few years prior to their being “Greens”, hardly anyone of them had had anything to do with environmental causes at all. Instead, they had been fierce Maoists, Trotzkyites, adorers of Ho Chi Minh and radical feminists, fighting, quite militantly, the “reactionary”, “fascist”, “patriarchal”, “imperialist” state, ironically at the time governed by social-democrat Helmut Schmidt. So, who were these people advertising themselves as “socially minded, ecological, direct-democratic and non-violent”, but whose “social justice” meant in fact socialist redistribution of wealth, whose “pacifism” was one-sidedly against U.S. military presence in Europe, and whose “environmentalism” was essentially inspired by a rabid and fanatical anti-industrial, anti-modernist and finally anti-civilisation attitude, sometimes with esoteric overtones? 

Petra Kelly

(a) Petra Kelly (1947 – 1992; originally, Petra Lehmann). After her parents’ separation, when young Petra was seven years old, her mother got remarried to an American military officer by name of John E. Kelly, and the new family moved to the United States in 1959. Petra Kelly attended High School first in Columbus, Ga., then in Hampton, Va., after which she enrolled at American University, Washington, D. C., from where she graduated with a B.A. in political science in 1970. She then returned to Europe and continued studying at the University of Amsterdam for one further year. Already in her years in the U.S., she had been politically active, campaigning for 1968 Democratic presidential candidates Robert Kennedy and, after RFK’s assassination, Hubert Humphrey, as well as against the Vietnam War. In the 1970s, she worked at the European Commission in Brussels, remaining a political activist at the same time. She was a member, until 1979, of the Social Democratic Party of Germany and then was a founding member and first chairwoman of the Green Party in Germany. By speaking out in favour of the (reform-communist) opposition in East Germany, she increasingly isolated herself in her own party and was eyed with suspicion by the Honecker regime in the East. She died under strange circumstances in 1992, together with her friend and party colleague Gert Bastian, a former high-ranking military officer in the West German Bundeswehr with likely East-German StaSi connections, in what was said to have been a murder/suicide committed by Bastian. The leading luminous figure of the German Greens was no more.

Otto Schily

(b) Otto Schily (born 1932). From upperclass background, Otto Schily was educated along the lines of Rudolf Steiner’s Anthroposophy (he still remains a confessing anthroposophist to this day). He studied law and political science and became a lawyer specialising in representing leftwing radicals of the infamous Red Army Faction milieu. Schily was personally befriended with Germany’s revolutionary icon at the time, Rudi Dutschke. He was an influential founding member of the German Greens in 1980, but switched to the Social Democrats in 1989, for whom he then held the post of Federal Minister of the Interior during the years of the Red-Green coalition government under Gerd Schröder and Joschka Fischer from 1998 till 2005. Unlike in his early years as a pro-communist lawyer, in his function as Minister of the Interior he appeared fairly rigid and somewhat closer to conservative positions.

Fischer, Joschka

(c) Joschka Fischer (born 1948). Fischer, the son, suitably, of a butcher, matches perfectly the profile of a communist misfit. He dropped out of gymnasium age 17, then out of a photography apprenticeship one year later. Beginning in 1967, age 19, Fischer was already active in the radical student movement of the day, including the so-called APO (extra-parliamentary opposition). He worked jobs in Marxist book-stores and publishing houses, attended (as a guest auditor) university lectures by Frankfurt School icon Theodor Adorno and second-generation Critical Theorist Jürgen Habermas. He was also working as a taxi driver for a number of years. In 1969, he attended a PLO meeting in Algiers. In 1971 he took a job at the car manufacturer Opel with the intent to mobilise Opel workers for the revolution. His plan failed and he was fired on the spot. Until 1976, he was part of the radical-left-militant group Revolutionary Struggle and took part in street clashes, in which several police men were, in part, heavily injured. Then came the atrocities of 1977 (German Autumn), in which the Red Army Faction terrorists assassinated West-German Attorney-General Siegfried Buback and President of the Confederation of German Employers’ Associations, Hanns Martin Schleyer. Also, there was a spectacular plane hijacking in an attempt to blackmail the German government into releasing a group of imprisoned RAF terrorists. Chancellor Schmidt stood firm, and so, parked on a runway on the airport of Mogadishu, Somalia, and after an odyssee through the Arab world, in which the plane’s captain was killed, that plane was stormed by German GSG-9 special units who were able to save all passengers; only one hijacker survived. Joschka Fischer claims, not very convincingly, that the year 1977 led him to change his mind and leave behind his former militancy. However, he did not change his revolutionary attitudes at all. Even before he joined the Frankfurt Greens in 1982, Joschka Fischer formed, together with French-German radical Daniel Cohn-Bendit (the leader of the 1968 Paris student riots and known in France as Dany le Rouge), a platform they called Arbeitskreis Realpolitik. With their concept of revolutionary realism (one could also say: mature, pragmatic Leninism) they then invaded the Frankfurt Greens, and within a year Joschka Fischer had a seat in the German Bundestag in Bonn. From 1985 till 1994 he was Minister for the Environment and Energy in the state of Hesse and from 1998 till 2005 German Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor. What a career! Today, Joschka Fischer, who was once known for wearing jeans, woollen jumpers and sports shoes, is a “distinguished” elder statesman, living the high life and meanwhile in his fifth marriage.

DCB 2

(d) Daniel Cohn-Bendit (born 1945; a.k.a. Dany le Rouge). Cohn-Bendit’s career as an anarcho-Marxist radical started not in Germany, but in France, and so right at birth, as already Cohn-Bendit’s father was a Trotzkyite. Suitably, young Daniel attended, beginning at the age of 13, a model progressive “reform-pedagogical” school (founded in 1910), the Odenwaldschule outside Heppenheim/Bergstraße, Germany, which practised radical anti-authoritarianism, where students and teachers addressed each other on a first-name basis and all teaching was guided by a strict rejection of any idea of “education”; rather, the school saw itself as an “enabler” for the student to “become himself”. One of Cohn-Bendit’s teachers was the German communist Ernest Jouhy (in fact: Ernst Jablonski), who after the death of Cohn-Bendit’s father in 1959 became his personal mentor. Given such family- and educational background, it is no wonder that Daniel Cohn-Bendit became a full-blown (self-professed) anarchist! After graduation from the Odenwaldschule in 1965, Cohn-Bendit returned to France, where he enrolled at the newly founded University of Paris-Nanterre, of course in sociology. Cohn-Bendit immediately joined a Marxist-anarchist group on campus and was soon to acquire, in the year 1968, public notoriety far beyond the confines of his university. This unruly, rebellious kid of meanwhile 23 years (who nevertheless knew his revolutionary tactics) suddenly was the iconic leader of a student- and then nationwide revolutionary movement that effectively threw political France into a severe crisis. The University of Paris-Nanterre, which the revolutionaries had turned into a battle field, had to be closed. On time for Karl Marx’s 150th birthday, May 5, 1968, street clashes followed. The Sorbonne was then closed, too. Prominent communist writers and intellectuals threw their support behind the revolutionary movement. A week later, 20,000 students were marching in the streets of Paris. The police had little choice but to dissolve those manifestations by using force (the action lies in the reaction!). As a consequence, student unions, part of the university teachers’ associations as well as the trade unions agreed to declare a general strike across France, which was indeed followed by 7 to 10 million French. Cohn-Bendit even went as far as calling for the toppling of the national government under President Charles de Gaulle and the establishment of a Soviet republic along anarcho-syndicalist lines! What a madness! At a manifestation of radicals in Berlin on May 21, Cohn-Bendit demanded the French Tricolour (which is itself the banner of the French Revolution) to be torn apart and replaced by the Red Banner! The following day, the French government announced a refusal of entry for Daniel Cohn-Bendit, whose citizenship is not French, but German. In response to this decision, the Paris students were chanting, “We are all German Jews!” Being a true revolutionary, Cohn-Bendit tried to enter France nonetheless at a border crossing near Saarbrücken, accompanied by several hundreds of like-minded radicals. Massive numbers of German border police and French Republican Guard made sure he couldn’t get in. And so Cohn-Bendit simply slipped into France illegally, where he happily joined his fellow revolutionaries! In the following weeks, he lost his influence over the movement to Maoist groups and eventually left for Frankfurt/Main, Germany, where he became part of the radical “Sponti” movement there. Taking some vacation from his revolutionary activities, he spent part of the summer in Italy, together with beautiful French actress Marie-France Pisier! One can’t make this up: Cohn-Bendit, an adventurer of the first order (for which quite a few people actually loved and admired him). But of course he remained a dangerous revolutionary communist! He attended sociological lectures by Adorno and Habermas at the University of Frankfurt; expressed his support for the Baader-Meinhof terrorist group, later known as Red Army Faction, whom he visited in their prison cells; founded himself a group, “Revolutionary Struggle”, that sought to infiltrate trade unions (Joschka Fischer was part of that group); ran a communist bookstore; supported the squatting of empty buildings; worked in leftwing kindergartens; had a leftwing-alternative newspaper; fought against nuclear energy. Finally, with his “Arbeitskreis Realpolitik”, he and Joschka Fischer managed to gain control of the still-embryonic Frankfurt Greens. In 1985, Fischer became Minister for the Environment in the state of Hesse, with Cohn-Bendit serving as his advisor. From 1989 till 1997, Cohn-Bendit was the head of a newly formed Office for Multicultural Affairs in Frankfurt’s city government, eventually designating Frankfurt as a “sanctuary city”. After that, he became a “European politician only”, running alternately for the German and French Greens in the European Parliament. Between 2002 and 2014, he was even the European Greens’ co-chair. Had Cohn-Bendit ever been an “environmentalist” prior to his days as a “Green” politican? Nope. He was and is as red as it can get, even though he has won himself the respected reputation of a “non-violent” communist. In recent years, Cohn-Bendit, now 74 years old, has even become a fairly popular media figure. No doubt, his revolutionary activism has not kept him from becoming a wealthy man: Praise to the Revolution! – Below is a recording of a late-night open-end talk show of June 13, 1978 produced by (Red) Austrian Broadcasting, in which Daniel Cohn-Bendit and his co-revolutionary Rudi Dutschke were invited on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of the May 1968 revolution. The other guests were Kurt Sontheimer, a partly sympathising political scientist and himself a member of the Social Democratic Party of Germany, and, as the only conservative in the discussion, Matthias Walden, a leading German journalist both in television and newspaper publishing. The debate was hosted by an Austrian leftist par excellence, Günter Nenning, who several years later became a key figure in the establishment of the Austrian Greens. Even readers who don’t know any German are recommended to have a glimpse into this three-hour talk, just to watch the body language and the overall tone of the debate, which was absolutely conspiratorial, with exception of course of Matthias Walden. Cohn-Bendit and Dutschke were dominating the discussion from beginning to end, revolutionary style, greatly enabled by their host and fellow leftist Günter Nenning. In other words: The whole thing was a farce!                             

 

Jürgen Trittin 1986

(e) Jürgen Trittin (born 1954). Jürgen Trittin is another example of a hardcore-leftist having turned “environmentalist”. From bourgeois family background, Trittin had a fairly comfortable start in life. His father (born 1923), who had been towards the end of the war an SS Obersturmführer, frankly explained to his son the mass killings of the Shoah perpetrated by Hitler’s regime. The son took his father’s confessions to his heart – and became a Maoist communist. After graduating in social sciences, Trittin, through his wife, joined the Greens as early as 1980, rose through the ranks of the Greens in Lower Saxony and then nationwide, and held the post, from 1998 till 2005, of Federal Minister for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Under his tenure, Germany decided for gradually closing all of its nuclear power plants (“Atomausstieg”). As the Greens are against fossil-fuel-based energy and even hydro-electricity too, what they pursue is an overall “Energiewende”, stubbornly ignoring the fact that an industrial nation such as Germany can’t be run on solar and wind energy alone. But then, our “crazed” Greens aren’t so much naïve than walking in the footsteps of Pol Pot’s agrarian communism, it seems… Further proof that these “former” sixties’ radicals have perfectly kept their communist convictions (and tactics), whether as now-respected social democrats or as respected Greens, can be found in a brief segment of a 90-minute documentary aired by Germany’s ARD television on July 26, 2011, titled Sozialdemokraten: 18 Monate unter Genossen (i.e., Social Democrats: 18 Months Among Comrades). In a lecture setting, Jürgen Trittin speaks to a small group of leading social democrats, including their chairman at the time, Sigmar Gabriel. Analysing Sigmar Gabriel’s speech at the SPD’s party conference of November 2009, Trittin relates to a particular passage where Gabriel had said, “The political centre is not defined by income- or professional groups, and by the way also not by certain political views to which one would have to adapt. The political centre of Willy Brandt was something entirely different. It was no distinct place, but it was the prerogative of interpretation [Deutungshoheit] in society.” – “Prerogative of interpretation,” Trittin continues, “that’s the key term in this speech, and that means something entirely different than mere majority appeal. Rather, it goes back to Antonio Gramsci’s term of Hegemony. (Sigmar Gabriel nods silently.) The remark comes indeed as a bombshell: Antonio Gramsci (1891 – 1937) was not only one of the founders of the Communist Party of Italy in 1921, he has also become famous as the author of the so-named Prison Notebooks, in which he advocates a clandestine type of cultural warfare against the established order to eventually gain across-the-board control over the hearts and minds of a society. German revolutionary of the ’60s, Rudi Dutschke, echoed that sentiment when he called for a “long march through the institutions” – which is precisely what those sixties’ radicals, both in America and Europe, have put into practice: they polished up their appearance, abandoned for the most part their revolutionary rhetoric and indeed became acceptable for ever greater portions of the electorate. The key word here, as always with communism, is deception, plain and simple.

DIETER KUNZELMANN

(f) Hans-Christian Ströbele (born 1939). Like Otto Schily, Hans-Christian Ströbele was in the seventies a lawyer for members of the communist terrorist group Red Army Faction (RAF), among them one of their key figures, Andreas Baader. Ströbele publicly referred to these terrorists, in communist fashion, as “comrades” and was even convicted for supporting a criminal association. In other words, his role seems to have exceeded the limits of a mere sympathetic lawyer. In 1969, Ströbele had co-founded the so-named Socialist Lawyers’ Collective (in operation till 1979) which sought to offer legal support for leftwing activists. He also was one of the founders in 1978/79 of the far-left/sponti newspaper taz. From 1970 till 1975, Ströbele was a member of the Social Democratic Party, until he was expelled due to his closeness to the RAF. In 1978, he co-founded a so-named Alternative Liste für Demokratie und Umweltschutz, which was the forerunner of the Berlin Greens. What a miraculous change of mind with all those Marxist radicals: By the end of the 1970s, they had suddenly all become concerned with the environment! Later, as a Green MP, Ströbele took on the role of criticising Joschka Fischer from the left (which was quite a joke, as there are no “moderates” among Greens).

Also other German “Greens” (they are Reds) such as Fritz Kuhn, Reinhard Bütikofer, Bärbel Höhn, Renate Künast, Claudia Roth or Krista Sager, all share those same radical views. Being Marxist revolutionaries, they oppose everything that could make a society strong and prosperous, which perfectly gives them away, in the final analysis, as what they really are: anti-civilisation; anti-man!  

(1) They are against nuclear energy, but by their fictitious non-argument of “anthropogenic global warming” they are also against coal, oil, natural gas, diesel and petrol, or the burning of timber, not to forget: they greatly dislike hydroelectric power plants, as well (making sure that their countries depend ever more on energy imports from brotherly Russia).

(2) By their supposed environmentalism, which is mere anticapitalism under a Green label, they must protect, no matter what, forests and deers and fishes all over the world. As a consequence, they’ve already greatly harmed the timber- and fishing industries. On the other hand, which illustrates the hypocrisy of it all, the gruesome reality that their cherished (laughably inefficient) wind-mills are killing birds and bats (as well as insects) by the truck-loads (and, believe it or not, are heating up the atmosphere) and that their equally cherished (and equally laughably inefficient) photovoltaic technology creates a hell of a lot of environmental problems with regard to the production, maintenance and especially disposal of solar panels, doesn’t seem to bother our left-leaning press.

(3) Greens, who are in fact Reds, are of course fiercely inimical to any form of individualism, self-responsibility or (God forbid) self-reliance. They are Marxist collectivists who view individualism as a “sin” against the community, a crime, an anti-social pathology (which needs to be treated accordingly and brings us back to the good old days of Soviet political psychiatry).

(4) They call for astronomical taxes for the wealthy (their darling being a property tax) and a guaranteed minimum wage for the have-nots. If they could, they would most happily determine a maximum living space per person to live in, one car per family (or, even better, zero cars at all) and would like to see a general atmosphere of “self-restraint” and “sharing” in society.

(5) As Marxists (of whatever shade), they are anti-authority and of course anti-God (unless they themselves represent that authority, as “new gods”). Insofar, they also fight any and every aspect of traditional society, especially the role of the father, on whom rests the well-being and stability of a society. Hence, away with him! To those ends, they aggressively propagate feminism and female careerism, divorce, birth control and abortion, promiscuity and libertinage, homosexuality and “gender mainstreaming”, as well as widespread drug abuse. Although they otherwise don’t care about religion (their own ideology is already a “religion” in its own right), they applaud the idea of women priests. It’s all of a piece: Down with patriarchy! As a consequence, children grow up virtually fatherless (and mostly in day care institutions), handicapped for life.

(6) However, it goes deeper (and gets more sinistre) still. As Marxists, they hate Christ. And so, every measure, every strange alliance even, that helps to weaken or ridicule or finally check-mate Christendom, is greatly welcome. Thus, the Red/Green Left’s otherwise incomprehensible alliance with Islam. Marxist feminists march alongside Muslim women with headscarfs, and not a word about the oppression of women in Islam anymore. It’s a temporary, tactical alliance eager to destroy Christianity.

(7) Our Green Reds famously pose as pacifists, despite their notorious sympathies for and connections with terrorists and totalitarian regimes. They are militants, of course, not pacifists – but they certainly want to bring their own countries’ militaries down as far as possible, serving as a convenient fifth column for still-Soviet Russia, communist China and the rest of the never-abolished communist world bloc.

(8) Greens are communist internationalists. They despise such sentiments as patriotism or love of country. To them, the nation state is a bourgeois, patriarchal, imperialist leftover of an old, obsolete world. And they need to get fully rid of it in order to establish their internationalised paradise on earth. Therefore their attacks against any idea of national borders and systematic attempts to undermine national sovereignty altogether, whether via international treaties, refugee waves or what not. Lenin is anti-state. So are his followers. And: They’ve been celebrating “Earth Day” every April 22 ever since April 22, 1970, which was Lenin’s 100th birthday!!!

(5) Foundations, Think Tanks and NGOsAs a rule of thumb, as of today, if an organisation promotes this “Green” stuff, it always can be found promoting the Red stuff, too (as in AOC’s hilarious “Green New Deal”)! The fact, for one example, that a co-founder of Green Peace (Patrick Moore) left the organisation in the mid 1980s because it had been taken over by extremists, says it all. Which applies of course to such niceties as the Club of Rome, Global 2000 or meanwhile even the WWF. Scratch the surface of any of these honourable initiatives, and you will find some insidious communist influence somewhere embedded in them.

l

(6) A Strange Hymn to a New World under Eco-Pagan Communism (recorded as early as 1991)

In closing, this author would like to present – of all the Jacques Cousteaus, Hans Hasses and David Attenboroughs – a maybe unexpected “eco-celebrity” to illustrate the omnipresence of communism in all those colourful, rainbowish movements. The celebrity in question is German punk diva Nina Hagen. Why Nina Hagen? This will need a little explanation.

Catharina “Nina” Hagen was born in East Berlin in March of 1955 as the daughter of GDR-actress Eva-Maria Hagen and script writer Hans Oliva-Hagen. Her parents separated when Nina was four. When she was ten, in 1965, her mother got to know West-German communist chanconnier Wolf Biermann, who had settled in the GDR back in 1953 as a sixteen-year-old and was now about to enter a new phase in his life as the communist authorities imposed a total stage ban on him, which lasted till his expulsion in 1976. From 1965 till 1972, Eva-Maria Hagen and Wolf Biermann were living together as a couple, with young Nina absorbing the artistic influence from this prominent stepfather of hers. Nina Hagen wanted first to become an actress like her mother. Due to “politically unreliable” Wolf Biermann’s presence in her life, she was not given that chance. Nina Hagen instead underwent an education as a “Schlagersänger” and was soon to be heard by East Germans with slightly audacious songs such as “Du hast den Farbfilm vergessen”. Nina Hagen, despite being partly sabotaged by the state because of Biermann, was nevertheless communist nobility. And so it is no wonder that, following Biermann over into the West at the turn from 1976 to 1977 (first to London, then to West Berlin), she quickly became a sharp critic in West Germany not of communism, but of capitalism (and of the Christian religion!!!) in the guise of a “punk” singer, who produced quite “un-punklike” intellectual lyrics and solely worked with excellent musicians. Strange enough, Nina Hagen, with great precision, reinvented herself several times in the following years, suddenly “believing in UFOs”, then in Hinduism and finally in a globalised type of eco-communism. On her 1991 album Street, there is a more than suspicious Rap piece titled “Nina 4 President”, which would have perfectly fitted the Obama campaign of 2008! Here is the title, followed by the lyrics as text (with bold print by this author):

   

Nina 4 President:

Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
My name is Nina, ich bin ein Berliner,
I run for president, a new world government,
The new world’s government is a screen,
we call it green dream, we will get the planet clean,
1991 is the time, open up your mind and listen to the rhyme,
we need some unity in every community,
get down, here’s the opportunity,
we need a leader, to speak up on the issues,
those who take offence, sorry if we dissed you
it’s critical, in the political arena,
the rhymes i wrote, yeah, to vote for Nina!
I say aloud, time’s run out, we bleed,
the poor and hungry are in need,
they need to eat, ??
food, and we are being rude,
to eat a holy cow is to eat another dude,
it will put your karma in the worst of moods,
I’m not telling lies, but this is why the rainforest… dies
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
You’re ready to join?
and dare to share?
Come on, be fair,
let me say it live, on the air,
unification is the hardest combination,
one love, one love nation…
We’re never gonna see, solar peace campaign,
to fight world pollution and stop acid rain,
South Africa, to the Berlin Wall, all negativity, must fall,
So in this election, make your selection,
We need a new leader, Vote for Nina!
No more fakes, no more mistakes,
this movement is sweeter than a million cakes
People have to know, that many politicians,
are under only private superstitious missions,
I always really wanted to tell you this,
Do you really know what Religion is?
Religion is to help, one another,
to love and to share, like a good mother,
now if you are a muslim,
or a jew, a christian, a buddhist, or a hindu,
a yogi, a flower, or a guru, your love is to god,
and he loves you…??
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero
Ok, No more torture, we’re going to be free
Stop messing around with atomic ENERGY
Love life, and peace, can only begin,
if you know in your heart, sun shines from within,
love all your brothers, and love all your sisters
love all the Misses and love all the Misters.
Don’t be shy when sharing your money,
be like the bees, sharing all your honey,
test my notion, the perfect peace potion,
can be found in the wake of the green seas motion,
The long, rocking swerve, the mighty blue ocean,
if you love peace, the perfect peace potion,
then we will find it with the sweet sea creatures
the spine of a dolphin is a built-in feature,
you will learn much peace with the whale as your teacher:
Good Morning, MC Shan, very nice to meet you!
You’re ready to join?
and dare to share?
Come on, be fair,
let me say it live, on the air,
unification is the hardest combination,
one love, one love nation…
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero
Okay
Nina for President,
Is this ok?
Okay.
l
l
What brutal confirmation that the communists have always been far ahead of us! This song has the whole programme of New-Age-flavoured eco-communism in it, and it was written almost thirty years ago! For those who might doubt that Nina Hagen (or Wolf Biermann, for that matter) could have been (and could still be) in bed, so to speak, with the Soviet strategists, listen to this veritable ode to Mikhail Gorbachev of 1989 titled Mikhail, Mikhail, written by Wolf Biermann.
l
And so, the question must be: Has this insane Global Warming hysteria already become a fait accompli for the Revolution? Until 2016, one would have said, “Probably.” But there is Donald Trump. And he has courageously stood up against the manipulators and has made it very clear that he doesn’t believe in “Global Warming”, for which they hate him even more. Donald Trump, a Russian stooge? He is the communists’ worst nightmare!!! And he might well be the last line of defence against worldwide communist tyranny. God bless him, God protect him, and may God keep and save the United States of America – without which the rest of the so-far-non-communist world will inevitably perish, even though the brainwashed Europeans stubbornly think that Russia is the way to go. Good luck, one can only say, with that…
l
____________________________________________________________________________________
l
l
Postscript: A few more “gems” underscoring the madness of it all
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
© The Contemplative Observer 2019
l
l
l
l

Theosophy and New Age: Satanism in Disguise

1. MESSAGE FROM MASTER GLOBI NAIROBI, THE MYSTICAL SAGE FROM MOUNT KILIMANJARO – A PARODY ON THE SINISTRE & TOTALITARIAN MINDSET OF THE ‘NEW AGE’

 

 

PEACE AND LOVE TO YOU ALL! MAY THE LIGHT BE WITH YOU, MAY IT GUIDE YOUR WAYS NOW AND FOREVER! GLOBI NAIROBI, THE SAGE FROM MOUNT KILIMANJARO, HAS SPOKEN. HE WISHES HIS CHILDREN WHO INHABIT THE EARTH TO TAKE NOTICE OF HIS RECOMMENDATIONS!  

Hope has come to all lands in the world and the cosmos! Hope is in reach, doubt in not, and indeed mankind may rejoice! As what is the prospect? Look at it closely! You’re about to be blessed and raised beyond measure. Don’t care about closed-minded skeptics, they’re a breed of the past. YOU are the ones who are called to step forth, pioneers of the future; your boldest of dreams exceded by showers of grace and limitless glory. Leave behind your doubts and fears, limitations, and happily enter the fullness of Light. Join in the mighty parade that is marching towards breathtaking vistas. Know that you’re part of this grandiose plan and be grateful; the power of Light has won your innermost, why hesitation? And then look around and watch the millions rise from their utter despair, taking their chance and looking ahead and march whatever it takes, until they’ll have reached the source and merge with the Light. Great is He who brings the healing Light of wisdom and clarification to a world obscured by centuries of suffering. Finally, you will understand the meaning of greatness and wonder. Why haven’t you asked for it earlier and entered the realms of illumination? Yet, the Light is willing to welcome you all and embrace you in vastness and beauty. Gone are the times of worry and needless concern as now you have reached the point of decision. Thoroughly weigh the options at hand and don’t be mistaken. Light cannot reach where darkness and ignorance dwell. Trust in the Light as It fills you with wisdom of old. Open your heart and soul for ecstatic vibrations. See the beams of the rainbow surround your existence by beautiful colours unseen. Share and agree so to reach the highest of high, the knowledge of eons. Free yourself from want and ambition, distinction and pride. Look at the many who’ve made their decision like you and strive ever forward towards promising dawns of worlds beyond care. Isn’t it worth to consider which road and path should be taken? Be mindful and wise before you continue your journey! Man has come a long way to be granted this noblest of chances. UNION is the wonderful hope and promise for those who have chosen. Therefore, choose well and accept the Oneness of all who have chosen already. Be part of a grand and excellent cause that doesn’t know separation. Only the Love and Communion of all is worthy of consideration. Hence, join the powerful league of the willing and brave and sacrifice old-fashioned custom. Be guided by reason, break free from  the ties and shackles that have kept you imprisoned in useless tradition. Only the brave have come out of dark superstition! They know neither king nor priesthood, nor property of any kind. Theirs is nothing and equally all – as all belongs to the cosmos. This, my friend, is the truth and message from Kilimanjaro: claim not a thing to be yours as all must be shared. Who and what is in fact your belonging? Why can’t you be at peace when women seek freely their loving companions? Marriage, know this, is illusion, and so is parental command. Every soul is part of the greater and must be allowed to go with the flow. Love and affection are harmful, my friend, as soon as they’re binding. Therefore accept your offspring to merge with the wider collective. They may be parents a hundred times better than you, so why the annoyance! Love is all, and all are tied together in a circle of love. Keep this in mind when you think about entering the spaces of Light and illumination! Sentiment, mind it, will never be present in the Era of Reason! Hence, say farewell to the ways of the fathers, they haven’t brought liberation. We, instead, hold the shining keys to the future. – Are you ready to accept the Light and join our forces? What, do you think, would be the outcome if you maintained your resistance? Well, friend, know this: it wouldn’t be charming! As one thing is definite, like or not: those who refuse to join the New Age of promise and hope will be crushed. Only the willing and chosen will be able to reach the shores of tomorrow. Therefore, again, think over the issue in proper reflection. The days of old, they are gone, get ready for the most sensational dawn in the history of man! Have you now reckoned where you belong, amongst the dead or the living? Then hurry, don’t miss the transition towards brighter and happier days!

Thus has spoken the Great and Revered, Globi Nairobi from faraway Mount of Kilimanjaro. Remember well his words and don’t take them lightly! As, days are about to approach that will force mankind into illumination. There won’t be much choice in these cosmic events except death or joining the Light!

 

 Babatunde Olatunji, Nigeria: ”Shango”, Chant to the God of Thunder, 7′02″, recorded on Oct. 1, 1959 at CBS studios, New York City. From the album “Olatunji! – Drums of Passion” – (Click on music-icon above) 

“Shango, protect me! Gatekeeper of the passenger train. Today belongs to the passengers; tomorrow belongs to the gatekeeper. / Shango, you lap blood like the cat that laps palm oil, costumed like the acrobatic masquerade, labala, with the cloth of death. / Shango, you are the death that drips, drips, drips like indigo dye dripping from an adire cloth.” 

(“God of Thunder”, transferred into occidental, Greek-Roman mythology, would be Zeus/Jupiter. – And guess who alone is honoured at the New York headquarters of the pagan-theosophist-utopian UN with a statue quite prominently placed in the main lobby: none other than Zeus, head of the Greek pantheon, to whom – another interesting fact – all Olympic games, first held in modern times in 1896, are dedicated. In other words, we’re living in a revived Age of Zeus, brought about by a powerful network of occultists who seem to charm every spiritist or Pagan foolishness, let alone their own top-secret Masonic rituals, as long as they can avoid resp. work against undistorted Christianity.)

 

2. PROOF OF THE GRAVENESS OF THE MATTER

There’s plenty of proof of the seriousness of the threat. – Mind the, if not exactly identical lingo, so definitely identical credo and “Luciferian fogging” being spread by, among others, the following prominent New Age proponents:

David Spangler

(a) David Spangler, 1945 born follower of Alice Bailey’s variant of the Luciferian sect of “Theosophy” and influential leader in the (directly “Theosophy”-inspired) New Age movement. Spangler, who describes himself as a spiritual teacher and clairvoyant since 1964 (!), became in the early 1970s an important figure in the New-Age-eco-futuristic Findhorn commune in Scotland and later founded several similar groups in the United States, among them in 1974 the Washington State based Lorian Association that aims at a “contemporary,” “incarnational spirituality” (whatever that means…). – In his 1977 book, “Reflections on the Christ,” Spangler made the following overtly Nietzschean-Satanic statements that literally blow the mind, despite his deceptive and foggy writing style (bold print emphasis by this author):

Lucifer, then, is neither good nor bad in his true essence. He is completely neutral. He is an agent of God’s love acting through evolution. The energies he provides for our use are neutral. We can use them, the energies of experience and of consciousness, to draw to ourselves things that help us to grow or we can draw to ourselves limitation by refusing to grow (p. 41). –– Lucifer prepares man in all ways for the experience of Christhood and the Christ prepares man for the experience of God. Jesus said, “As the Christ, I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man goes to the Father but through me.” This is true. The avenue out of microcosmic limitation into macrocosmic wholeness, universal consciousness and attunement is through the Christ. But the light that reveals to us the presence of the Christ, the light that reveals to us the path to the Christ comes from Lucifer. He is the light giver. He is aptly named the Morning Star because it is his light that heralds for man the dawn of a greater consciousness. He is present when that dawn is realized. He stands no longer as the tester or the tempter but as the great initiator, the one who hands the soul over to the Christ and from the Christ on into even greater realms (pp. 43, 44). – At some point each of us faces the presence of Lucifer. We either fear it when we come to grips with what we term ancient evil or the spirit of darkness, or we move through it and realize that we are each of us light and dark. Until we accept the fact and realize that through the experience of light and dark we gain the perception of the greater light behind both of them, we will remain caught between the polarities, between the forces of struggle and opposition. When we do accept it, we can emerge into the radiance of our inner light, the light that can never be extinguished, the light and presence of God wholly active within the microcosm, therefore wholly uniting that microsocm with all that extends beyond. And at that point, that individual is well on the way to moving beyond the human kingdom into the superhuman kingdom of mastery, of adeptship, or whatever you wish to call it, or simply the kingdom of the consciousness that is at one with itself, with its past, with its future, one with God (pp. 44, 45). – Lucifer comes to give us the final gift of wholeness. If we accept it then he is free and we are free. That is the Luciferic initiation. It is one that many people now, and in the days ahead, will be facing, for it is an initiation into the New Age. It is an initiation of leaving the past and moving into the new, shedding our guilts and fears, our anxieties, our needs, our temptations, and becoming whole and at peace because we have recognized our inner light and the light that enfolds us, the light of God. In the new age consciousness there is not good and evil. There is light and the manifestation thereof, either skilfully or not so skilfully. There is the presence of God and the manifestation thereof. There is oneness, wholeness and the manifestation thereof. As the light-giver of man’s microcosmic kingdom has kindled that flame to where it can unite with the light of the whole, so man and God may now become one and go forth from there (pp. 45). – [Here’s also a half-hour talk by David Spangler recorded apparently in 2013 at a “Lorian weekend.” If you can bear the heavy Luciferian fogging, have a look.]

However, there is only one kind of truthful spirituality, and that’s the mystical path of surrender to God, the Lord and Creator of all things. This one and only path (if we are talking about paths) is simply known as religion (Latin, religio: re-connection) and wouldn’t be called that way unless it were substantially more than mere morals and ethics: namely, nothing less than the return to and eventual finding of our Creator! – There is no alternative to it other than empty nihilism or the bizarre magick practiced by the followers of the left-hand “path” who refuse, like their evil master, to bow down and pay respect and honour to the One who is nevertheless their Lord and Creator and instead seek to become gods themselves! As a result, their pride, their rebellion, their lust for power and carnal gratification draws upon them curse without end. Many of them know full well they have chosen the way to hell, yet they carry on along their road of wickedness and even deceive as many as they can into joining them, unwilling or unable to repent and return from their dark nightmare out into the shining light of day, where goodness and forgiveness would await them any time. Luciferian Theosophy and Freemasonry aren’t a road to the heavens, rather they lead straight into darkness and destruction; unfortunately, those involved in them, proud and arrogant anyway, most likely won’t realize they have been deceived by Lucifer’s “cold light of enlightenment” before they’ve passed the point of no return…  

Robert Muller 2

(b) Robert Muller (1923-2010): disciple of Theosophist Alice Bailey and admirer of Catholic heretic and evolutionist Teilhard de Chardin; long-term Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations, and in that function for many years the UN’s “philosopher” and “cosmic” mover and shaker, as well as ambitious pro-moter of a “humanistically,” in fact: socialistically inspired world core curriculum; tellingly, one of Robert Muller’s books is titled, “New Genesis: Shaping a Global Spirituality.” – See a 30-minute conversation of Robert Muller with “retired Catholic priest and modern mystic,” Father Charles Moore (1927-2007) of ca. 2006 about “peace, harmony, laughter, and love:” (Part I) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXBgd1CCxDI&feature=related; (Part II) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wii1ykKmZbQ&feature=related. – Note that the cross Robert Muller is wearing in that video (click to enlarge the image above) has almost certainly nothing to do with the Christian cross: it’s probably supposed to be a Rose Cross (see here), the emblem of the extremely secretive, deliberately syncretistic, “alchemist” Rosicricrucian movement, that is most likely a continuation of the Knights Templar and forerunner of as well as deeply interconnected with Freemasonry, Theosophy, as well as all branches of Socialism as well; some view the Rosicrucians as the “heart” of Satanism, and the huge and highly active international (“Illuminati”) Satanic network, that is a reality, must have its origin somewhere after all (and Weishaupt’s subversive Illuminati order wasn’t founded until 1776, whereas Rosicrucianism goes back at least to the early 17th century, according to their legends even to the late 15th century)! – In any case, it’s a well-known fact that Rosicrucian and Theosophist esotericism (the Theosophical Society was founded by Blavatsky, Olcott and others in 1875) is big with the United Nations, almost certainly it is no less than its basis, including even top officials such as the Secretaries General of the 1950s and 1960s, Dag Hammarskjöld and U Thant; the President of the World Bank during the 1970s, Robert McNamara; or the here-mentioned assistant Secretary General, Robert Muller; furthermore, there is Alice Bailey’s Theosophist Publishing Company, in 1922 founded as “Lucifer Trust,” but soon renamed into “Lucis Trust,” that to this day holds close ties to its Manhattan “neighbour,” the United Nations, and seems to be the fairly hidden “spiritual” centre of the UN, along with “World Good Will,” the United Religions Initiative, the World Parliament of Religions, the Temple of Understanding, and many more so-called Interfaith organisations, whose purpose is not just dialogue but a complete merger of all religious denominations into one single hybrid world “faith,” that will then be, in all brutality, the Theosophist-Luciferian New Age cult. (Fatally, this development towards an “enlightened” Utopia has been strongly supported by all post-conciliar Popes since “good” Pope, John XXIII, which is why the Roman Catholic Church should be understood as equally being held captive by the very same forces that dominate the UN – every world religion is now in imminent danger of being co-opted and finally swallowed by this evil Rosicrucian-Theosophist-Masonic spirit that is certainly not about tolerance and co-existence but intends to subject the whole of mankind under its Satanic doctrines. Things get even worse as soon as one becomes aware of the heavy involvement of BIG money in this sinistre project of reshaping the world: circles, we can bet, that are at the top of the global Masonic pyramid of power and that involve pretty every fortune, foundation, or Royal Family of significance.) Therefore all the talk about Oneness and one world and one human family etc. etc., that so oddly resembles the totalitarian motto of Nazi Germany, “Ein Volk! Ein Reich! Ein Führer!” (“One People! One Empire! One Leader!”). And remember: the Nazis were after the church almost as much as the Russian Bolshevists; their reckoning, however, was rather long-term: their new National Socialist youth would be educated to be “fast as greyhounds, tough as leather, and hard as Krupp steel” and would soon forget the “sentimental” religious affiliations of their forefathers (hasn’t that again happened during the last 20 to 25 years???). Worse, the New Agers are preaching – mimicking last day prophecy of several religions – the nearing reappearance of a world teacher, which is in fact their central theme; they call him Maitreya (derived from Buddhism), The Christ (a bold perversion of Jesus Christ), The Mahdi (Imam Mahdi is the one expected to appear by the Muslims); they have several more labels and chiffres they throw into their confused, syncretist cocktail, like the Solar Logos, Gaia (the Earth goddess), Sanat Kumara (the latter extremely close to admitting they’re Satanists), the Karmic law, of course (the Asian concept of cause and effect as a basis for reincarnation, which means, if you think about it, a basically never-ending cycle of returning and ever again returning into this life, without a chance of Divine Grace, because in this belief system there is none, as they don’t accept God the Lord), their beloved ancient Egyptian deities right through, whether Ra, Isis, Osiris, and Horus and  so forth, the legendary places of Atlantis, Lemuria, Avalon, Shambala, mystical Mount Kailash, plus all the urban ET legends with mother ships, Pleiadians etc. That’s the “new spirituality,” and although such craziness (just read Rudolf Steiner; beware of his Waldorf schools, by the way…) under different circumstances would be viewed as what it is: a psychiatric disorder, it is now these people who claim to be the ones apt to lead and even “save” the world! (Never mind, they will find a solution for the psychiatric issue: they’ll just turn the psychiatric apparatus upside down and declare insane, Soviet style, everyone who is left with a sound mind and a pure, God-loving heart.) But, let’s take them serious, not because they’re sane (they aren’t), but because they are deadly serious, they mean it! What they advertise as the coming world teacher should make us think about where we have reached: as, what all this is about, is the staging of a false Messiah, in other words (and this is essential): the enthronement of the Antichrist! Thus, it becomes clear we indeed are close to the end of time and the Day of Resurrection as depicted in Scripture. These Theosophists and New Agers are the false prophets we can read about in the Revelation of St. John. Let’s not be fooled by them and instead stick with our hearts and minds to the Greatness and Glory of the Eternal God no matter what! – Some excellent sources on the subject: Christian researcher, Constance Cumbey, God bless this remarkable lady, has done marvellous work writing “The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow: The New Age Movement and Our Coming Age of Barbarism” (1982) and “Planned Deception: The Staging of a New Age Messiah” (1986); see her also in this one-hour-lecture of 2006 in which she describes her courageous journey that started around 1980 and led her right behind the shining facade of the ever-“positive” New Agers: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2540076336823118757; then, there is a veritable reference publication on the topic by Christian author Lee Penn: “False Dawn: The United Religions Initiative, Globalism, and the Quest for a One World Religion” (Sophia Perennis, 2004, order at: http://www.falsedawn.us/author.htm); then, a very scholarly work by comparative religions expert and Sufi, Charles Upton: “The System of Antichrist: Truth and Falsehood in Postmodernism and the New Age” (Sophia Perennis, 2001: http://www.sophiaperennis.com/shop/perennis/34). Finally, two historic works of the 1920s by superb French metaphysician and Sufi, René Guénon: “Theosophy: History of a Pseudo-Religion” and “The Spiritist Fallacy,” (both books also at Sophia Perennis). – These things are very real… 

Barbara Marx-Hubbard 3(c) Barbara Marx Hubbard (born 1929): a vice-presidential candidate for the Democratic Party in 1984; life-long dedicated “futurist,” in earlier years promoter of American-Soviet dialogue, and untiring drummer for a transformative world shift (in other words: world revolution!) towards “co-creation” (again, the very same Nietzschean spirit!); her “spiritual path” went from Abraham Maslow over Buckminster Fuller and Teilhard de Chardin to Sri Aurobindo, all of them “prophets” of a futuristic, hybrid, one-world “spirituality.” In  a short online-bio, she describes, having been born into a secular Jewish New York family, her obviously very brief encounter with Christianity: “I couldn’t find the answer in philosophy or religion – until I read the New Testament. ‘Behold I show you a mystery, we shall not all sleep, we shall all be changed.’ ….’You will do the work that I do, and even greater work than this will you do.’ … ‘The suffering of the present cannot be compared with the glory that shall be revealed in us.’ … ‘The former things are passed away.’ … etc. That’s IT, I thought. I’ll join the church.  I went down to the local Episcopal Church in Scarsdale, New York and asked the minister: ‘Is any of this true? Did Jesus really ascend?  Will we be able to do the work that he did and greater work, really?’ I saw he did not know. He enrolled me in Sunday school! Learning the Biblical story of the image of the jealous and violent Lord God Yahweh and Eve’s supposed guilt for wanting knowledge, and even for being attracted to the Tree of Life, the tree of the gods, deeply repelled me. I felt that Eve was right and that this story was fundamentally wrong. I left the church.” That means, Marx Hubbard sides with the serpent (http://www.co-intelligence.org/newsletter/BarbMarxHubbardStory.html)! Now, watch the following 8-minute-clip of 2009, in which Marx Hubbard most eloquently advertises (almost like a vacuum cleaner salesman) a New Age conference in Perpignan, France, named “Renaissance 2.” Her hypnotising rhetoric circles around technoid key words such as creativity, evolution, innovation, mobilisation, participation, non-linear action (in other words: acceleration; a theme already propagated in 1987 by Mikhail Gorbachev’s “Second Russian Revolution” a.k.a. Perestroika – by the way, Mikhail Gorbachev is prominently involved in the New-Age/Green revolution via his Gorbachev Foundation, Green Cross International, the Earth Charter Initiative, and others; so all who believe he has retired couldn’t be further from the truth: he is an influential global player continuing to work for his unchanged goal of Leninist world revolution probably to his last breath!), unlimited future, scanning-mapping-connecting (here Barbara Marx-Hubbard proofs to be a true Orwellian), and so forth: http://r2meshwork.ning.com/video/barbara-marx-hubbard-for-r2). There are many more appearances of Marx-Hubbard on the web; watch this talk of hers titled “A Vision for Humanity” (as of course our New Worlders, Theosophist or Marxist, are the visionary vanguard guiding the masses towards enlightenment and liberation…). Two of her books are, by the way: “Conscious Evolution: Awakening the Power of Our Social Potential” and “Emergence: The Shift from Ego to Essence”, clearly communistic titles.


Chris Griscom 5, reframed, small(d) Chris Griscom
(born 1942): equally well-earthed and out-of-space, seemingly never-aging, super-charming fairy queen and  somewhat divine feminist, preaching her Castaneda-style, pantheist, evolutionst New Age gospel and understanding of “healing” with wonderfully capturing, smooth oratory, her “Light Institute” being situated in the ancient lands of the Navajo in what is today the state of New Mexico. Check out this half-hour interview featuring Chris Griscom, in which she is confronted with a set of absolutely intelligent questions such as what her “mission” means to the traditional (and authentic) faiths. Never mind, she masters the challenge with great routine and sovereignty: Here is part 1 of 3.
Below is a series of snapshots taken from that interview. The first shows Chris Griscom at the beginning of the interview, still relaxed and charming as usual. However, especially in one particular sequence, she shows very different facial expressions that are outright horrifying! One especially odd stretch is in Part 1, at precisely 3 minutes 34 seconds (you can easily check it out yourself and pick that same fraction of a second within the video), just as Griscom explains her idea of God in connection to her then newly released book, “The Evolution of God,” and  immediately after she expresses most solemnly the word “God,” you suddenly see this more than disturbing demon’s grimace (extracted from the video by this author via snipping-tool), emerging very briefly for perhaps a quarter of a second and visible in three consecutive frames (if you travel through the whole length of the interview by this method, you will find more of that). It illustrates not only that spiritists tend to be taken over, at some stage of their “spiritual” careers, by demonic spirits, but also what the whole New Age, whether demonic or human, really thinks about God the Lord: they are repelled and disgusted. Why? Because they’re part of the other side!
l 
Chris Griscom, Bilderstecke 2
l
And indeed, some half a minute later, Chris Griscom expressedly confirms what her face had just shown unconsciously (like squeezed in horror) a moment before, namely her being very uncomfortable with the idea of a God and Lord. She explains, “I think the word ‘God’ is a little squeezy for my perspective, you know. I would like for us to feel goooood in the trees, in the animals, and in the wind, and to recognise that that divine source – which is what I call ‘god’ in this ‘Evolution-of-God’-book – is present in our lives everywhere. And so it’s not the kind of conversation: Am I following the dictates of the dogma of my church, but am I living what every religion says, which is to be a good human, to be a loving human, that’s something we can all come together with; and we can certainly do that better by stepping beyond the intellectual aspect of God. So, that is what that book is about…” –In that sense: Welcome to the all-unified Brave New World of humanist-democratic pantheism…
l

Eckhart Tolle(e) Eckart Tolle (born 1948), a more recent star having risen along with the rosy dawn of what is supposed to soon be a glorious and happy New World. See this postmodern “Master Eckhart” (he is German, and his real name is merely Ulrich Tolle) in a joint 2-hour presentation with another “spiritual master,” Ram Dass, here (and make sure you don’t fall asleep, disarmed and hypnotised by Tolle’s slow-motion speaking style). Wouldn’t, sorry to say, this strange creature have well fitted into Himmler’s deeply occult brotherhood of death a.k.a. SS (Nazi Germany was just as filled with Theosophy as is our contemporary New Age)? And isn’t it amazing to see the boldness and ease with which these self-appointed “apostles of light” (and the world is now being haunted by them in the tens of thousands) randomly usurp elements from Christian or Sufi-Islamic mysticism, from the Qabala, from Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism, not to speak of the various Shamanic traditions, to manufacture their own syncretistic, in any case Theosophist-Masonic ‘good news’ of salvation, that truly is right the opposite: a dangerous invitation into a dance with the devil, their constant Nietzschean “mantra” essentially being, “Become supermen!”, “Become gods!”. Thus, they serve as modern-day Biblical snakes who try with their never-ending sweet words to tempt people into accepting their forbidden fruit of “liberation,” “empowerment,” “Kundalini-awakening,” shedding of all piety, fear, respect, and shame, and so forth. Yet, man is not going to be elevated by striving either for power or for primitiveness (there is huge even historical evidence for this), but by bowing down to his Lord in worship and prayer! That’s the eternal truth. Everything else is a bunch of lies. 

1010global

(f) “10:10global” (British “climate change” campaign NGO, founded in 2009): See an absolutely scandalous, as well as shocking, 4-minute short-film by this NGO that went far over the top and thus turned out to be a miserable own goal: In several enacted episodes, people, even school children, who fail to show their cooperativeness in cutting their personal CO2 emissions by 10% annually get coldbloodedly (even with a smile!) blown up into pieces by the mere push of a button; scenes that fatally remind of the infernal horrors of Lenin’s (and Dzerzhinsky’s) Red Terror following the Russian October Revolution of 1917. (Click on the picture above to watch the video!) Unwillingly, as well, the film revealed what school really is these days: a place for socialist indoctrination and social engineering. Although the clip was intended for TV-broadcast and display in cinemas throughout the U.K., luckily it never made it, after an immediate public outcry, beyond the organisation’s own website, from where it soon had to be removed as well, and Youtube, where it still can be viewed. The affair greatly illustrated the aggressive revolutionary spirit of the Green movement that is in many ways interlinked not only with the far Left – well, it is today’s far Left -, but also with the New Age movement, and has thus itself become a dangerous, totalitarian cult in which, as they view it, an urgently endangered “Mother Earth” needs to be “rescued” now and at all costs from the “destructive effects” of man’s modern industrial society, if not from man altogether! Authors such as Ernest Callenbach (Ecotopia), James Lovelock (The Gaia Hypothesis), or Keith Farnish (Time’s Up! An Uncivilized Solution To A Global Crisis), for a few examples, all demand such an ecosocialistic, post-industrial Politeia, Utopia, New Atlantis, 1984, or Brave New World, all of them demonstrating in different shades the radicalism at work behind this movement. The giant hoax is of course so-called Anthropogenic Global Warming (meanwhile relabelled as “Climate Change”), which suggests the fictitious necessity of cutting down CO2 emissions ideally to zero; along with the myth of “fossil fuels,” that says crude oil and natural gas are sparse, organic substances that will expire within the next couple of decades. In fact, it has long been proven that crude oil is entirely anorganic and being constantly produced and re-produced by the earth! But this is the sacrosanct, and indispensable, core of the environmental movement’s belief system. Overwhelming scientific evidence suggesting otherwise – as presented by thorough climatologists such as Dr. Richard Lindzen of the MIT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sHg3ZztDAw – is being stubbornly ignored. What their leaders and financiers well know, but most of them don’t, is the brutal, even suicidal consequences of such a totally unnecessary and mad “decarbonisation” of world economy: economic contraction right to the point of collapse (and, mind, at a time of already massive economic stagnation). In other words, what these people ask for is large-scale poverty and death, to be followed by the erection of a global North Korea. And wouldn’t a globalised tyrannical system be easier to handle when there are only a billion or less people on this planet rather than the current 7 billion? The ominous, UN-/Rosicrucian inspired “Georgia Guidestones” erected in 1980 have it clearly written on them: “Maintain humanity under 500.000.000 in perpetual balance with nature,” resp. “Don’t be a cancer on the Earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature”. Yet, will the Green romanticists in time awake to the fact that they have been, in good old insidious Marxist-Leninist fashion, instrumentalised as “useful idiots” for a cause they do not understand? A cause that is in reality the formation of a merciless socialistic (call it Communist, call it Fascist) Luciferian “New Age,” in which man would have been stripped not only of all tradition, religion, family unit, and individual strength, but any God-given dignity whatsoever, and subjected, whether Gulag- or fancy Brave-New-World style, to an ultimate technocratic tyranny that wouldn’t leave him even the tiniest room for humaneness,  in fact would turn him into a robot, a cyborg, a mere neurone within a world-wide, all-interconnected electronic hive-collective (Hollywood has been feeding us these types of scenarios over many decades for a reason). An all-pervasive, omnipresent spiderweb of mutual control and mutual correction (i.e., of ‘peer-pressure’), way beyond the historically known pyramidal form of societal organisation (not getting away with the pyramid itself, of course), in other words: none other than Lenin’s “state of the whole people,” meaning the final – electronically and pharmaceutically guaranteed – realisation of “pure communism”; call it the nightmare of the Satanic forces seemingly “triumphing” over God’s reign, if you will. Although such a system of ultimate darkness, by human reckoning, can’t last for long.

(g) “Megacities on the Move: How will people travel in the cities of the future? Your guide to the future of sustainable urban mobility in 2040. Four possible scenarios.” Not long after the “1010global” brutality, there was launched another advertising campaign for a “sustainable future”, again out of the U.K., that called itself, ‘Megacities on the Move’. It was organised by the British environmental NGO, ‘Forum for the Future.’ Note: There is no consideration given to rural areas and the countryside. It’s all only about cities, which is completely in line with the UN’s Agenda 21, that foresees humanity removed from the countryside and packed into urban conglomerates! Also, do mind the happy communist fists by these activists!

Forum for the Future

This ‘Megacities on the Move’ campaign presented, as short video clips, four alternative visions of urban living and mobility in the year 2040 (strangely, these four videos are not, or no longer, presented on the organisation’s official YouTube channel, but only on some other private YouTube channel instead). All four scenarios are utterly distopian and horrifying, and are peppered with ugly English sarcasm. There is no substantial choice in this weird presentation. Our Green one-worlders just aren’t into the old ways. As Marxist-revolutionary totalitarians, all they have in mind is collectivist tyranny, the one way or the other. Here are their four “possible scenarios” (click on the images to view the respective clips):

Megacities on the Move, Sprawl-Ville

I. SPRAWL-VILLE: “The city is dominated by fossil fuel-powered cars. The elite still gets around, but most urban dwellers face poor transport infrastructure.” The clip starts with a series of newspaper headlines suggesting the following timeline: “2010: Global Climate Change Deal Fails.” – “2018: 3 Months Traffic Jam Ends in Tragedy.” – “2026: Wealth Gap Reaches Historic High.” – “2035: Beijing and Singapore ban non-electric cars in city centres.” – In this perspective, the state has withdrawn from most areas, even most hospitals have been closed, schooling is taking place virtually, online, due to the massive cuts in the public sector, and the “entrepreneurs have taken over the economy” [you see: the Greens are into Marxist, anti-capitalist class warfare; in fact, this outlook is a bizarre caricature of Reaganonomics and Thatcherism]. The streets are packed with cars, traffick jams of several days (!) are the norm, which is why many people don’t use their cars anyway. Only the “elite”, for whom life is perfectly easy, gets built for themselves a separate network of “billionaire super-highways”. Decent jobs are rare, unless one is part of the well-connected. There are permanent shortages of food and fuel, with frequent food riots as a consequence; most people can’t afford buying things in the “corporate-owned super markets” and evade to the black market, despite the “religious and ethnic tensions” that characterise that future society. Because Russia has cut back their wheat exports, people now live more on peas and potatoes. Also water is being massively rationed so people e.g. use “0%-water shampoos”. [This is, more or less, our present world, as viewed through the distorted lens of eco-Marxism, including the heavy eco-policies, that are already a reality today.]

II. PLANNED-OPOLIS:imageedit_2_5300468225 “In a world of fossil fuels and expensive energy, the only solution is tightly planned and controlled urban transport.” Here, the opening trailer goes: “2010: Global Climate Change Deal Imminent: Globe on low-carb diet.” – “2016: City Corp and Lagos Government: Joint Venture to Re-design City.” – “2024: Plans for New Floating Cities Approved: Bangladesh and the Netherlands to Trial Project.” – “2032: Global Food Council Rations Water: New Powers to Control Farming.” – This is, more or less, the old Soviet model: strictest central planning, albeit ‘streamlined’ through efficient computerised control. Food is rationed via “calory cards”. Because of the ‘Global Carbon Deal’, there is no individual car traffic, except for the rich. Everybody else uses a pre-order transport system named “Slick Travel Corp”, all remote-controlled, or goes by electric bike. School children are “allocated” to a particular school, and their careers are decided upon by the all-knowing state. The Global Food Council doesn’t allow a lot of variety of food; this month it’s pea & potatoe pie [again pea and potatoe; they don’t like meat, because – bottom line – a vegetarian diet tends to make people weak, which is very much in the interest of the totalitarian state; food as a weapon, the ever-same Stalinist recipe of control]. There seem to be many desalination plants, as water is rationed too; former car-parks are now used to grow food (which, given the overall shortages, is more than necessary); people don’t see each other that often in person, but communicate via internet or telephone. There are even huge floating cities, one called “New Amsterdam” off the Dutch coast, whereby the problem of ever-rising sea levels [a myth!] has been solved. Apart from this modern world, however, there exist also backward und underprivileged ‘Cry Freedom Ghettos’, inhabited presumably by rebels and dissidents, very much like in George Orwell’s 1984.

Megacities on the Move, Communi-City

III. COMMUNI-CITY: “The world has turned to alternative energy, and transport is highly personalised, with a huge variety of transport modes competing for road space.” The trailer at the beginning goes: “2010: Global Climate Change Deal Fails.” – “2017: UN Disbanded! – G20 on hold as new President voted in by facebook.” – “2024: Bangladesh and Netherlands Hit by Worst Ever Floods: New International Alliance of ‘L20’ low-lying countries to deal with threat.” – “2032: Alternatives now Mainstream: Renewables now outproduce fossil fuels.” – This clip presents a society that appears much more individualistic (the way it’s painted, though, shows that the environmentalists do NOT like individualism, but regulation). Cities are more loose aggregations of very different areas. No uniformism as such, but all very much futuristic. There’s hardly any public transport, apart from ‘bio-buses’. Streets seem very much crowded, but people can cope. Some grow their own bio-fuels, and there’s ‘vertical farming’, but food prices are high, nonetheless, as land has become extremely expensive. [Even this seemingly non-ideological version is a Utopian nightmare. Traditional life, for the eco-Marxists, quite obviously is a non-option!]

Megacities on the Move, Renew-abad

IV. RENEW-ABAD: “The world has turned to alternative and high-tech, clean, well-planned transport that helps everyone get around.” The ‘breathtaking’ situation here is: “2010: Landmark Global Climate Deal: Strict Carbon Quotas and $ 1 Trillion Mitigation Fund.” – “2018: ‘C8’ Powerful World Cities Hold First Summit: Cyber Armies Agreed.” – “2025: $ 1 BN Beijing Energy Innovation Contest Leads to Hydrogen Cells Breakthrough.” – “2033: China – Mexico – Turkey Coalition Planned to Hunt for More Lithium.” – This seems to be a ‘well-oiled’ modern society, completely ecological and perfectly computerised at the same time. Even spouses and close relatives appear to see each other rarely except via holographic communication. People live in modern-day green enclaves that look like little caravan parks. There are wind turbines, people produce their own fertiliser, and individual surplus of energy is being shared with the neighbours. People now work very little. They have abandoned their former consumerism and simply enjoy their abundant free time. Traffic jams are a thing of the past as all traffic is centrally controlled by computers. A high-speed “Golden Star” [sic!] train system connects all parts of the city in no time. There are imports from Morocco of little hydrogen cars. People do most things via computer – whether it’s shopping, private exchange, or work. Yet, there are also “non-transition zones” within these cities, troublespots, populated by people who’ve been left behind as they refused to adopt the “low-carbon way of life.” But, what the opening trailer is pointing at is already the next looming “energy crisis” as it is now lithium, essential for the production of hydrogen cells, that is running short – these so-called Greens indeed are true Marxist cynicists. This latter ‘vision’, certainly the campaign’s favourite, comes extremely close to Ernest Callenbach’s 1975 eco-communist cult novel, Ecotopia. However, what’s missing is the answer to the question: What exactly are the people of “Renew-abad” doing in all their free time? In Ecotopia they smoke dope and fornicate …

 

3. WHERE FROM NOW?

We should maybe turn our attention to those times in human history during which religious persecution was at its worst and learn; not necessarily in order to dig ourselves caves or catacombes, although such practical precautions might turn out to be extremely helpful. Yet, who can afford building for himself and his family fully equipped bunkers as sophisticated as has built, collectively, the “former” Soviet Union? The catacombes we should take into view just as thoroughly are of a different nature, i.e. of a spiritual kind. And we shouldn’t take this as inner emigration or preemptive surrender. After all, despite we the people being many and they the totalitarians being few, still, there is very little chance to fight and defeat a system as murderously armed as the emerging ultimate communist tyranny of today. All we can hope and pray for, finally, is that it will implode – which, sooner or later, it will: godless systems expire quickly; the more godless, the more so!

In our “spiritual catacombes” we are going to be safe. Safe due to a deep and strong connection with God the Lord. Though in no other age of history as “difficult,” ultimately, it’ll be such intense prayer and deep spiritual contemplation that will, God willing, give us shelter and bring us eventual salvation. Nothing else. This isn’t just a time for “heroes,” as many would like to think, it’s a time for saints! Are we? By now, rarely. Yet, we need to go into that direction, and full-heartedly so, if we wish to be amongst those loved and accepted by our Heavenly Father. – Hence, let us take the following out of the Revelation of St. John both as a warning and as a comfort and encouragement (Rev. 21:1-8, KJV): 

And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful. And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely. He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

  

Henry Purcell (1659 – 1695): Anthem “Praise the Lord, O Jerusalem!” (Psalm 147:12; Isaiah 49:23; Psalm 48:8; Psalm 21:13), 9’25”, The Deller Consort, recorded 1973 – (Click on music-icon above)

 

 

 

© The Contemplative Observer 2010/11

 

l