“Once a Decisive Majority Believes in Global Warming, Capitalism Is Finished.”

 

The Emperor's New Clothes

 

The headline is a quote from an April 2015 article titled “Green Is the New Red” by U.S. geopolitical analyst J. R. Nyquist. Oh yes indeed, science has been replaced (not for the first time in history) by pseudo-science, rational thinking by emotion, and objective truth by yet another incarnation of the Great Lie. To declare a thing real or not real, the established methodical process of verification or falsification is no longer needed. Instead, a mere “democratic majority” (whatever ignorant or deluded), a societal “consensus”, suffices to determine what is the case and what isn’t. To hell with all those petty, old-fashioned concerns and calls for irrefutable proof! After all, reality is fluid, and everything is part of a process of evolution anyway. If virtually everybody “knows” from deep within that something is true (because it just feels so true), how can it ever be otherwise?

We are on an ultra-dangerous path into yet another era of complete totalitarianism. Truth (whether scientific or spiritual) doesn’t count anymore. We believe – with our guts – in the sacred well-being of, above all, trees and animals, in “carbon foot-prints” and an “impending climate apocalypse”, which can only be averted by immediate drastic measures on a global scale. Man has caused, by his industrialised civilisation, a near-irreversible heating of the earth, we’re told. And so he needs to be stopped, by whatever means necessary. If he has to adopt a stone-age-type of existence, so be it. If a certain percentage of the world population has to go, let them go. Doesn’t this remind us of the great mass killers in history, of the terrible likes of Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao or Pol Pot?

l

And what about the scientific credentials of those who propagate this now-fashionable idea of “anthropogenic global warming” (that is certainly no “theory” in the scientific sense, not even an hypothesis)? Could it be that these people are not so much authorities in the field, but pursuing a perfidious and destructive agenda (dressed up as “science”, but being in fact a monstrous ideological cult) to kill off not only wealth and prosperity, but any and every aspect of freedom and individual choice, to begin with? And hasn’t this climate change bandwagon all the hallmarks of an aggressive revolutionary movement, that cleverly links unfounded claims about the earth’s atmosphere with all-out socialist/communist demands to radically restructure society? Please, watch British Channel 4’s groundbreaking documentary of 2007, The Great Global Warming Swindle, and watch it to the end, before you continue reading:

 

So, let’s summarise the major proponents – whether individuals or organisations – of this new climate change “orthodoxy”, that one-sidedly and dictatorially (as well as ridiculously) mandates, “The science is settled; the debate is over”:

(1) Al Gore. Albert Arnold Gore Jr., “left-of-centre moderate” Vice President of the United States under President Bill Clinton from 1993 through 2001, the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate in the 2000 U.S. Presidential elections and Nobel Peace Prize laureate of 2007, together with the UN’s IPCC, “for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change”, is no scientist, in whatever field. “Earth balancer” and “inconvenient truther” Al Gore is merely a politician and a political progagandist. More precisely, like all “Greens”, he is in fact a Marxist radical, in the guise of a “well-meaning environmentalist” and establishment Democrat. His New-Age-flavoured “climate activism” is simply designed to bring down the U.S. (in fact, any Western) economy as thoroughly as possible. And wasn’t his family (and wasn’t Al Gore himself) closely linked to and supported by the late Occidental Petroleum chairman and Soviet agent Armand Hammer?

(2) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC was founded within the framework of the United Nations in November of 1988 as an outgrowth, more or less, of the 1985-established Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases. The timing is significant, as this was the height of Gorbachev’s deceptive perestroika campaign. By “perestroika” – engl., restructuring – the communist world meant the restructuring (in Obama-speak, “fundamental transformation”) not of itself, but of the West, which duly came to pass. It is important to realise that the IPCC, though it has been sold to the public as a scientific institute, is in fact a mere political body, to be more precise: like all UN-affiliated organisations, an instrument for the Revolution. Take the IPCC’s chairman from 2002 to 2015, Rajendra Pachauri. The man has no clue whatsoever about climate science; in fact, he is a railroad engineer! He backed his organisation’s deliberate scientific “misconduct” (read: forgeries) designed to dupe the world into believing in a fairy-tale called “anthropogenic global warming”. Also Pachauri’s predecessors Robert Watson (United Kingdom) and Bert Bolin (Sweden), though from the field, had been acting rather as rabid propagandists than scientists, pushing forward an ever-more-monstrous eco-totalitarian agenda that they based on the never-proved (in fact, long-disproved) assumption of human CO2 emissions causing the earth’s climate to spin out of control. From the 1992 Earth Summit at Rio de Janeiro to the 1997 Kyoto Protocols to the 2015 Paris Climate Accord, the only thing that has grown exponentially has been an ever-wilder hysteria (so typical of revolutionary movements) that, by now, doesn’t take a no any more. “Climate sceptics”, who are even termed “heretics”, are being threatened and intimidated, while the majority of politicians and corporate leaders have been persuaded of the reality of “climate change” and have given up their resistance to the radical demands of the “climate protectionists”. Our youth, from kindergarten to university, has meanwhile been indoctrinated in the new religion of “climate change” for easily 25 years. Let’s get out of nuclear energy as well as oil and gas and switch to solar- and wind energy! Let’s prohibit all privately owned cars and restrict aerial transport to those who really need it, which is us! Let’s make veganism mandatory (at least, for the masses)! Let’s massively de-industrialise our economies and create a much more livable world guided by a new, fashionable primitivist tribalism! Let’s take (whatever is left) from the rich countries and give it to those once known as “developing countries”, whom we have forbidden to develop, without actually lifting them up out of their poverty. It’s the perfect recipe for an Orwellian – worse: Huxleyan – police communism, where to question the guidelines coming out of the United Nations (or, ultimately, out of Moscow and Beijing) qualifies for insanity!

(3) Mikhail Gorbachev. The uninformed reader may be perplexed: What, in the world, does this wonderful, wonderful man, who brought down communism in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, have to do with eco-communism? Two severe flaws with such an objection: First, Gorbachev isn’t a “wonderful man”, but has been and will be to his last breath a die-hard Marxist-Leninist. Secondly, his function was precisely to choreograph a fake collapse of communism in order to deceive and put to sleep the West and prepare it for convergence with the communist world, on communist terms. And isn’t it interesting that he founded, in 1993, an environmental organisation by name of Green Cross International? Obviously, the “post”-Soviets were very much interested in getting the global warming charade going in the countries of the West. Already in Gorbachev’s programmatic (and quite revealing) book of 1987, Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World, we can read the following (taken from page 137):

But the Soviet Union alone cannot resolve all these issues. And we are not ashamed to repeat this, calling for international cooperation. We say with full responsibility, casting away the false considerations of “prestige,” that all of us in the present-day world are coming to depend more and more on one another and are becoming increasingly necessary to one another. And since such realities exist in the world and since we know that we in this world are, on the whole, now linked by the same destiny, that we live on the same planet, use its resources and see that they are not limitless and need to be saved, and nature and the environment need to be conserved, then such a reality holds for all of us. The necessity of effective, fair, international procedures and mechanisms which would ensure rational utilization of our planet’s resources as the property of all mankind becomes ever more pressing.

The Soviet deceivers’ main argument, in general, was interdependence. The world’s problems, in whatever field, can’t be solved by individual nation states any more; hence, the need for ever-closer cooperation. In part, like with the international crime epidemic, they themselves created those problems; in other fields, like with the revolutionary sorcerer’s wand of “global warming”, they invented them. The West should never ever have reacted to those deceptive invitations and should have left the communist world to stew in its own juice until a real break with communism and real decommunisation would have taken place!

(4) The Green political parties. It should be mentioned at first that environmental protection, forest conservation, the creation of national parks etc. had been around at least for a century before the crazed and drug-ridden 60s’ radicals, mainly in the latter half of the seventies, suddenly discovered their own affinity with Rousseauan nature romanticism, or so it seemed, and a new cult of smallness and primitiveness, which they made greatly fashionable. However, if one takes a more thorough look at the various protagonists in these parties – and most blatantly in Germany – one can see that just a few years prior to their being “Greens”, hardly anyone of them had had anything to do with environmental causes at all. Instead, they had been fierce Maoists, Trotzkyites, adorers of Ho Chi Minh and radical feminists, fighting, quite militantly, the “reactionary”, “fascist”, “patriarchal”, “imperialist” state, ironically at the time governed by social-democrat Helmut Schmidt. So, who were these people advertising themselves as “socially minded, ecological, direct-democratic and non-violent”, but whose “social justice” meant in fact socialist redistribution of wealth, whose “pacifism” was one-sidedly against U.S. military presence in Europe, and whose “environmentalism” was essentially inspired by a rabid and fanatical anti-industrial, anti-modernist and finally anti-civilisation attitude, sometimes with esoteric overtones? 

Petra Kelly

(a) Petra Kelly (1947 – 1992; originally, Petra Lehmann). After her parents’ separation, when young Petra was seven years old, her mother got remarried to an American military officer by name of John E. Kelly, and the new family moved to the United States in 1959. Petra Kelly attended High School first in Columbus, Ga., then in Hampton, Va., after which she enrolled at American University, Washington, D. C., from where she graduated with a B.A. in political science in 1970. She then returned to Europe and continued studying at the University of Amsterdam for one further year. Already in her years in the U.S., she had been politically active, campaigning for 1968 Democratic presidential candidates Robert Kennedy and, after RFK’s assassination, Hubert Humphrey, as well as against the Vietnam War. In the 1970s, she worked at the European Commission in Brussels, remaining a political activist at the same time. She was a member, until 1979, of the Social Democratic Party of Germany and then was a founding member and first chairwoman of the Green Party in Germany. By speaking out in favour of the (reform-communist) opposition in East Germany, she increasingly isolated herself in her own party and was eyed with suspicion by the Honecker regime in the East. She died under strange circumstances in 1992, together with her friend and party colleague Gert Bastian, a former high-ranking military officer in the West German Bundeswehr with likely East-German StaSi connections, in what was said to have been a murder/suicide committed by Bastian. The leading luminous figure of the German Greens was no more.

Otto Schily

(b) Otto Schily (born 1932). From upperclass background, Otto Schily was educated along the lines of Rudolf Steiner’s Anthroposophy (he still remains a confessing anthroposophist to this day). He studied law and political science and became a lawyer specialising in representing leftwing radicals of the infamous Red Army Faction milieu. Schily was personally befriended with Germany’s revolutionary icon at the time, Rudi Dutschke. He was an influential founding member of the German Greens in 1980, but switched to the Social Democrats in 1989, for whom he then held the post of Federal Minister of the Interior during the years of the Red-Green coalition government under Gerd Schröder and Joschka Fischer from 1998 till 2005. Unlike in his early years as a pro-communist lawyer, in his function as Minister of the Interior he appeared fairly rigid and somewhat closer to conservative positions.

Fischer, Joschka

(c) Joschka Fischer (born 1948). Fischer, the son, suitably, of a butcher, matches perfectly the profile of a communist misfit. He dropped out of gymnasium age 17, then out of a photography apprenticeship one year later. Beginning in 1967, age 19, Fischer was already active in the radical student movement of the day, including the so-called APO (extra-parliamentary opposition). He worked jobs in Marxist book-stores and publishing houses, attended (as a guest auditor) university lectures by Frankfurt School icon Theodor Adorno and second-generation Critical Theorist Jürgen Habermas. He was also working as a taxi driver for a number of years. In 1969, he attended a PLO meeting in Algiers. In 1971 he took a job at the car manufacturer Opel with the intent to mobilise Opel workers for the revolution. His plan failed and he was fired on the spot. Until 1976, he was part of the radical-left-militant group Revolutionary Struggle and took part in street clashes, in which several police men were, in part, heavily injured. Then came the atrocities of 1977 (German Autumn), in which the Red Army Faction terrorists assassinated West-German Attorney-General Siegfried Buback and President of the Confederation of German Employers’ Associations, Hanns Martin Schleyer. Also, there was a spectacular plane hijacking in an attempt to blackmail the German government into releasing a group of imprisoned RAF terrorists. Chancellor Schmidt stood firm, and so, parked on a runway on the airport of Mogadishu, Somalia, and after an odyssee through the Arab world, in which the plane’s captain was killed, that plane was stormed by German GSG-9 special units who were able to save all passengers; only one hijacker survived. Joschka Fischer claims, not very convincingly, that the year 1977 led him to change his mind and leave behind his former militancy. However, he did not change his revolutionary attitudes at all. Even before he joined the Frankfurt Greens in 1982, Joschka Fischer formed, together with French-German radical Daniel Cohn-Bendit (the leader of the 1968 Paris student riots and known in France as Dany le Rouge), a platform they called Arbeitskreis Realpolitik. With their concept of revolutionary realism (one could also say: mature, pragmatic Leninism) they then invaded the Frankfurt Greens, and within a year Joschka Fischer had a seat in the German Bundestag in Bonn. From 1985 till 1994 he was Minister for the Environment and Energy in the state of Hesse and from 1998 till 2005 German Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor. What a career! Today, Joschka Fischer, who was once known for wearing jeans, woollen jumpers and sports shoes, is a “distinguished” elder statesman, living the high life and meanwhile in his fifth marriage.

DCB 2

(d) Daniel Cohn-Bendit (born 1945; a.k.a. Dany le Rouge). Cohn-Bendit’s career as an anarcho-Marxist radical started not in Germany, but in France, and so right at birth, as already Cohn-Bendit’s father was a Trotzkyite. Suitably, young Daniel attended, beginning at the age of 13, a model progressive “reform-pedagogical” school (founded in 1910), the Odenwaldschule outside Heppenheim/Bergstraße, Germany, which practised radical anti-authoritarianism, where students and teachers addressed each other on a first-name basis and all teaching was guided by a strict rejection of any idea of “education”; rather, the school saw itself as an “enabler” for the student to “become himself”. One of Cohn-Bendit’s teachers was the German communist Ernest Jouhy (in fact: Ernst Jablonski), who after the death of Cohn-Bendit’s father in 1959 became his personal mentor. Given such family- and educational background, it is no wonder that Daniel Cohn-Bendit became a full-blown (self-professed) anarchist! After graduation from the Odenwaldschule in 1965, Cohn-Bendit returned to France, where he enrolled at the newly founded University of Paris-Nanterre, of course in sociology. Cohn-Bendit immediately joined a Marxist-anarchist group on campus and was soon to acquire, in the year 1968, public notoriety far beyond the confines of his university. This unruly, rebellious kid of meanwhile 23 years (who nevertheless knew his revolutionary tactics) suddenly was the iconic leader of a student- and then nationwide revolutionary movement that effectively threw political France into a severe crisis. The University of Paris-Nanterre, which the revolutionaries had turned into a battle field, had to be closed. On time for Karl Marx’s 150th birthday, May 5, 1968, street clashes followed. The Sorbonne was then closed, too. Prominent communist writers and intellectuals threw their support behind the revolutionary movement. A week later, 20,000 students were marching in the streets of Paris. The police had little choice but to dissolve those manifestations by using force (the action lies in the reaction!). As a consequence, student unions, part of the university teachers’ associations as well as the trade unions agreed to declare a general strike across France, which was indeed followed by 7 to 10 million French. Cohn-Bendit even went as far as calling for the toppling of the national government under President Charles de Gaulle and the establishment of a Soviet republic along anarcho-syndicalist lines! What a madness! At a manifestation of radicals in Berlin on May 21, Cohn-Bendit demanded the French Tricolour (which is itself the banner of the French Revolution) to be torn apart and replaced by the Red Banner! The following day, the French government announced a refusal of entry for Daniel Cohn-Bendit, whose citizenship is not French, but German. In response to this decision, the Paris students were chanting, “We are all German Jews!” Being a true revolutionary, Cohn-Bendit tried to enter France nonetheless at a border crossing near Saarbrücken, accompanied by several hundreds of like-minded radicals. Massive numbers of German border police and French Republican Guard made sure he couldn’t get in. And so Cohn-Bendit simply slipped into France illegally, where he happily joined his fellow revolutionaries! In the following weeks, he lost his influence over the movement to Maoist groups and eventually left for Frankfurt/Main, Germany, where he became part of the radical “Sponti” movement there. Taking some vacation from his revolutionary activities, he spent part of the summer in Italy, together with beautiful French actress Marie-France Pisier! One can’t make this up: Cohn-Bendit, an adventurer of the first order (for which quite a few people actually loved and admired him). But of course he remained a dangerous revolutionary communist! He attended sociological lectures by Adorno and Habermas at the University of Frankfurt; expressed his support for the Baader-Meinhof terrorist group, later known as Red Army Faction, whom he visited in their prison cells; founded himself a group, “Revolutionary Struggle”, that sought to infiltrate trade unions (Joschka Fischer was part of that group); ran a communist bookstore; supported the squatting of empty buildings; worked in leftwing kindergartens; had a leftwing-alternative newspaper; fought against nuclear energy. Finally, with his “Arbeitskreis Realpolitik”, he and Joschka Fischer managed to gain control of the still-embryonic Frankfurt Greens. In 1985, Fischer became Minister for the Environment in the state of Hesse, with Cohn-Bendit serving as his advisor. From 1989 till 1997, Cohn-Bendit was the head of a newly formed Office for Multicultural Affairs in Frankfurt’s city government, eventually designating Frankfurt as a “sanctuary city”. After that, he became a “European politician only”, running alternately for the German and French Greens in the European Parliament. Between 2002 and 2014, he was even the European Greens’ co-chair. Had Cohn-Bendit ever been an “environmentalist” prior to his days as a “Green” politican? Nope. He was and is as red as it can get, even though he has won himself the respected reputation of a “non-violent” communist. In recent years, Cohn-Bendit, now 74 years old, has even become a fairly popular media figure. No doubt, his revolutionary activism has not kept him from becoming a wealthy man: Praise to the Revolution! – Below is a recording of a late-night open-end talk show of June 13, 1978 produced by (Red) Austrian Broadcasting, in which Daniel Cohn-Bendit and his co-revolutionary Rudi Dutschke were invited on the occasion of the tenth anniversary of the May 1968 revolution. The other guests were Kurt Sontheimer, a partly sympathising political scientist and himself a member of the Social Democratic Party of Germany, and, as the only conservative in the discussion, Matthias Walden, a leading German journalist both in television and newspaper publishing. The debate was hosted by an Austrian leftist par excellence, Günter Nenning, who several years later became a key figure in the establishment of the Austrian Greens. Even readers who don’t know any German are recommended to have a glimpse into this three-hour talk, just to watch the body language and the overall tone of the debate, which was absolutely conspiratorial, with exception of course of Matthias Walden. Cohn-Bendit and Dutschke were dominating the discussion from beginning to end, revolutionary style, greatly enabled by their host and fellow leftist Günter Nenning. In other words: The whole thing was a farce!                             

 

Jürgen Trittin 1986

(e) Jürgen Trittin (born 1954). Jürgen Trittin is another example of a hardcore-leftist having turned “environmentalist”. From bourgeois family background, Trittin had a fairly comfortable start in life. His father (born 1923), who had been towards the end of the war an SS Obersturmführer, frankly explained to his son the mass killings of the Shoah perpetrated by Hitler’s regime. The son took his father’s confessions to his heart – and became a Maoist communist. After graduating in social sciences, Trittin, through his wife, joined the Greens as early as 1980, rose through the ranks of the Greens in Lower Saxony and then nationwide, and held the post, from 1998 till 2005, of Federal Minister for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Under his tenure, Germany decided for gradually closing all of its nuclear power plants (“Atomausstieg”). As the Greens are against fossil-fuel-based energy and even hydro-electricity too, what they pursue is an overall “Energiewende”, stubbornly ignoring the fact that an industrial nation such as Germany can’t be run on solar and wind energy alone. But then, our “crazed” Greens aren’t so much naïve than walking in the footsteps of Pol Pot’s agrarian communism, it seems… Further proof that these “former” sixties’ radicals have perfectly kept their communist convictions (and tactics), whether as now-respected social democrats or as respected Greens, can be found in a brief segment of a 90-minute documentary aired by Germany’s ARD television on July 26, 2011, titled Sozialdemokraten: 18 Monate unter Genossen (i.e., Social Democrats: 18 Months Among Comrades). In a lecture setting, Jürgen Trittin speaks to a small group of leading social democrats, including their chairman at the time, Sigmar Gabriel. Analysing Sigmar Gabriel’s speech at the SPD’s party conference of November 2009, Trittin relates to a particular passage where Gabriel had said, “The political centre is not defined by income- or professional groups, and by the way also not by certain political views to which one would have to adapt. The political centre of Willy Brandt was something entirely different. It was no distinct place, but it was the prerogative of interpretation [Deutungshoheit] in society.” – “Prerogative of interpretation,” Trittin continues, “that’s the key term in this speech, and that means something entirely different than mere majority appeal. Rather, it goes back to Antonio Gramsci’s term of Hegemony. (Sigmar Gabriel nods silently.) The remark comes indeed as a bombshell: Antonio Gramsci (1891 – 1937) was not only one of the founders of the Communist Party of Italy in 1921, he has also become famous as the author of the so-named Prison Notebooks, in which he advocates a clandestine type of cultural warfare against the established order to eventually gain across-the-board control over the hearts and minds of a society. German revolutionary of the ’60s, Rudi Dutschke, echoed that sentiment when he called for a “long march through the institutions” – which is precisely what those sixties’ radicals, both in America and Europe, have put into practice: they polished up their appearance, abandoned for the most part their revolutionary rhetoric and indeed became acceptable for ever greater portions of the electorate. The key word here, as always with communism, is deception, plain and simple.

DIETER KUNZELMANN

(f) Hans-Christian Ströbele (born 1939). Like Otto Schily, Hans-Christian Ströbele was in the seventies a lawyer for members of the communist terrorist group Red Army Faction (RAF), among them one of their key figures, Andreas Baader. Ströbele publicly referred to these terrorists, in communist fashion, as “comrades” and was even convicted for supporting a criminal association. In other words, his role seems to have exceeded the limits of a mere sympathetic lawyer. In 1969, Ströbele had co-founded the so-named Socialist Lawyers’ Collective (in operation till 1979) which sought to offer legal support for leftwing activists. He also was one of the founders in 1978/79 of the far-left/sponti newspaper taz. From 1970 till 1975, Ströbele was a member of the Social Democratic Party, until he was expelled due to his closeness to the RAF. In 1978, he co-founded a so-named Alternative Liste für Demokratie und Umweltschutz, which was the forerunner of the Berlin Greens. What a miraculous change of mind with all those Marxist radicals: By the end of the 1970s, they had suddenly all become concerned with the environment! Later, as a Green MP, Ströbele took on the role of criticising Joschka Fischer from the left (which was quite a joke, as there are no “moderates” among Greens).

Also other German “Greens” (they are Reds) such as Fritz Kuhn, Reinhard Bütikofer, Bärbel Höhn, Renate Künast, Claudia Roth or Krista Sager, all share those same radical views. Being Marxist revolutionaries, they oppose everything that could make a society strong and prosperous, which perfectly gives them away, in the final analysis, as what they really are: anti-civilisation; anti-man!  

(1) They are against nuclear energy, but by their fictitious non-argument of “anthropogenic global warming” they are also against coal, oil, natural gas, diesel and petrol, or the burning of timber, not to forget: they greatly dislike hydroelectric power plants, as well (making sure that their countries depend ever more on energy imports from brotherly Russia).

(2) By their supposed environmentalism, which is mere anticapitalism under a Green label, they must protect, no matter what, forests and deers and fishes all over the world. As a consequence, they’ve already greatly harmed the timber- and fishing industries. On the other hand, which illustrates the hypocrisy of it all, the gruesome reality that their cherished (laughably inefficient) wind-mills are killing birds and bats (as well as insects) by the truck-loads (and, believe it or not, are heating up the atmosphere) and that their equally cherished (and equally laughably inefficient) photovoltaic technology creates a hell of a lot of environmental problems with regard to the production, maintenance and especially disposal of solar panels, doesn’t seem to bother our left-leaning press.

(3) Greens, who are in fact Reds, are of course fiercely inimical to any form of individualism, self-responsibility or (God forbid) self-reliance. They are Marxist collectivists who view individualism as a “sin” against the community, a crime, an anti-social pathology (which needs to be treated accordingly and brings us back to the good old days of Soviet political psychiatry).

(4) They call for astronomical taxes for the wealthy (their darling being a property tax) and a guaranteed minimum wage for the have-nots. If they could, they would most happily determine a maximum living space per person to live in, one car per family (or, even better, zero cars at all) and would like to see a general atmosphere of “self-restraint” and “sharing” in society.

(5) As Marxists (of whatever shade), they are anti-authority and of course anti-God (unless they themselves represent that authority, as “new gods”). Insofar, they also fight any and every aspect of traditional society, especially the role of the father, on whom rests the well-being and stability of a society. Hence, away with him! To those ends, they aggressively propagate feminism and female careerism, divorce, birth control and abortion, promiscuity and libertinage, homosexuality and “gender mainstreaming”, as well as widespread drug abuse. Although they otherwise don’t care about religion (their own ideology is already a “religion” in its own right), they applaud the idea of women priests. It’s all of a piece: Down with patriarchy! As a consequence, children grow up virtually fatherless (and mostly in day care institutions), handicapped for life.

(6) However, it goes deeper (and gets more sinistre) still. As Marxists, they hate Christ. And so, every measure, every strange alliance even, that helps to weaken or ridicule or finally check-mate Christendom, is greatly welcome. Thus, the Red/Green Left’s otherwise incomprehensible alliance with Islam. Marxist feminists march alongside Muslim women with headscarfs, and not a word about the oppression of women in Islam anymore. It’s a temporary, tactical alliance eager to destroy Christianity.

(7) Our Green Reds famously pose as pacifists, despite their notorious sympathies for and connections with terrorists and totalitarian regimes. They are militants, of course, not pacifists – but they certainly want to bring their own countries’ militaries down as far as possible, serving as a convenient fifth column for still-Soviet Russia, communist China and the rest of the never-abolished communist world bloc.

(8) Greens are communist internationalists. They despise such sentiments as patriotism or love of country. To them, the nation state is a bourgeois, patriarchal, imperialist leftover of an old, obsolete world. And they need to get fully rid of it in order to establish their internationalised paradise on earth. Therefore their attacks against any idea of national borders and systematic attempts to undermine national sovereignty altogether, whether via international treaties, refugee waves or what not. Lenin is anti-state. So are his followers. And: They’ve been celebrating “Earth Day” every April 22 ever since April 22, 1970, which was Lenin’s 100th birthday!!!

(5) Foundations, Think Tanks and NGOsAs a rule of thumb, as of today, if an organisation promotes this “Green” stuff, it always can be found promoting the Red stuff, too (as in AOC’s hilarious “Green New Deal”)! The fact, for one example, that a co-founder of Green Peace (Patrick Moore) left the organisation in the mid 1980s because it had been taken over by extremists, says it all. Which applies of course to such niceties as the Club of Rome, Global 2000 or meanwhile even the WWF. Scratch the surface of any of these honourable initiatives, and you will find some insidious communist influence somewhere embedded in them.

l

(6) A Strange Hymn to a New World under Eco-Pagan Communism (recorded as early as 1991)

In closing, this author would like to present – of all the Jacques Cousteaus, Hans Hasses and David Attenboroughs – a maybe unexpected “eco-celebrity” to illustrate the omnipresence of communism in all those colourful, rainbowish movements. The celebrity in question is German punk diva Nina Hagen. Why Nina Hagen? This will need a little explanation.

Catharina “Nina” Hagen was born in East Berlin in March of 1955 as the daughter of GDR-actress Eva-Maria Hagen and script writer Hans Oliva-Hagen. Her parents separated when Nina was four. When she was ten, in 1965, her mother got to know West-German communist chanconnier Wolf Biermann, who had settled in the GDR back in 1953 as a sixteen-year-old and was now about to enter a new phase in his life as the communist authorities imposed a total stage ban on him, which lasted till his expulsion in 1976. From 1965 till 1972, Eva-Maria Hagen and Wolf Biermann were living together as a couple, with young Nina absorbing the artistic influence from this prominent stepfather of hers. Nina Hagen wanted first to become an actress like her mother. Due to “politically unreliable” Wolf Biermann’s presence in her life, she was not given that chance. Nina Hagen instead underwent an education as a “Schlagersänger” and was soon to be heard by East Germans with slightly audacious songs such as “Du hast den Farbfilm vergessen”. Nina Hagen, despite being partly sabotaged by the state because of Biermann, was nevertheless communist nobility. And so it is no wonder that, following Biermann over into the West at the turn from 1976 to 1977 (first to London, then to West Berlin), she quickly became a sharp critic in West Germany not of communism, but of capitalism (and of the Christian religion!!!) in the guise of a “punk” singer, who produced quite “un-punklike” intellectual lyrics and solely worked with excellent musicians. Strange enough, Nina Hagen, with great precision, reinvented herself several times in the following years, suddenly “believing in UFOs”, then in Hinduism and finally in a globalised type of eco-communism. On her 1991 album Street, there is a more than suspicious Rap piece titled “Nina 4 President”, which would have perfectly fitted the Obama campaign of 2008! Here is the title, followed by the lyrics as text (with bold print by this author):

   

Nina 4 President:

Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
My name is Nina, ich bin ein Berliner,
I run for president, a new world government,
The new world’s government is a screen,
we call it green dream, we will get the planet clean,
1991 is the time, open up your mind and listen to the rhyme,
we need some unity in every community,
get down, here’s the opportunity,
we need a leader, to speak up on the issues,
those who take offence, sorry if we dissed you
it’s critical, in the political arena,
the rhymes i wrote, yeah, to vote for Nina!
I say aloud, time’s run out, we bleed,
the poor and hungry are in need,
they need to eat, ??
food, and we are being rude,
to eat a holy cow is to eat another dude,
it will put your karma in the worst of moods,
I’m not telling lies, but this is why the rainforest… dies
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
You’re ready to join?
and dare to share?
Come on, be fair,
let me say it live, on the air,
unification is the hardest combination,
one love, one love nation…
We’re never gonna see, solar peace campaign,
to fight world pollution and stop acid rain,
South Africa, to the Berlin Wall, all negativity, must fall,
So in this election, make your selection,
We need a new leader, Vote for Nina!
No more fakes, no more mistakes,
this movement is sweeter than a million cakes
People have to know, that many politicians,
are under only private superstitious missions,
I always really wanted to tell you this,
Do you really know what Religion is?
Religion is to help, one another,
to love and to share, like a good mother,
now if you are a muslim,
or a jew, a christian, a buddhist, or a hindu,
a yogi, a flower, or a guru, your love is to god,
and he loves you…??
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero
Ok, No more torture, we’re going to be free
Stop messing around with atomic ENERGY
Love life, and peace, can only begin,
if you know in your heart, sun shines from within,
love all your brothers, and love all your sisters
love all the Misses and love all the Misters.
Don’t be shy when sharing your money,
be like the bees, sharing all your honey,
test my notion, the perfect peace potion,
can be found in the wake of the green seas motion,
The long, rocking swerve, the mighty blue ocean,
if you love peace, the perfect peace potion,
then we will find it with the sweet sea creatures
the spine of a dolphin is a built-in feature,
you will learn much peace with the whale as your teacher:
Good Morning, MC Shan, very nice to meet you!
You’re ready to join?
and dare to share?
Come on, be fair,
let me say it live, on the air,
unification is the hardest combination,
one love, one love nation…
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
All for one, one for all,
united we stand, divided we fall
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero!
Countdown…
Ten to zero,
Nina for president, vote your hero
Okay
Nina for President,
Is this ok?
Okay.
l
l
What brutal confirmation that the communists have always been far ahead of us! This song has the whole programme of New-Age-flavoured eco-communism in it, and it was written almost thirty years ago! For those who might doubt that Nina Hagen (or Wolf Biermann, for that matter) could have been (and could still be) in bed, so to speak, with the Soviet strategists, listen to this veritable ode to Mikhail Gorbachev of 1989 titled Mikhail, Mikhail, written by Wolf Biermann.
l
And so, the question must be: Has this insane Global Warming hysteria already become a fait accompli for the Revolution? Until 2016, one would have said, “Probably.” But there is Donald Trump. And he has courageously stood up against the manipulators and has made it very clear that he doesn’t believe in “Global Warming”, for which they hate him even more. Donald Trump, a Russian stooge? He is the communists’ worst nightmare!!! And he might well be the last line of defence against worldwide communist tyranny. God bless him, God protect him, and may God keep and save the United States of America – without which the rest of the so-far-non-communist world will inevitably perish, even though the brainwashed Europeans stubbornly think that Russia is the way to go. Good luck, one can only say, with that…
l
____________________________________________________________________________________
l
l
Postscript: A few more “gems” underscoring the madness of it all
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
© The Contemplative Observer 2019
l
l
l
l

2 thoughts on ““Once a Decisive Majority Believes in Global Warming, Capitalism Is Finished.”

  1. TroubledEuropean

    Just informing you, I believe there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the Hong Kong Democratic Party that is founded by Martin Lee and Szeto Wah is a creation of the Chinese Communist Party. When I was reading a Taipei Times article from 2016 on a High Ranking Chinese Communist Party Official Xu Jiatun (許家屯) who went into exile in the US after the Tiananmen 1989 incident had many secrets about the Chinese Communist Party that he never shared with the public despite passing away in 2016 in Los Angeles.

    In the Taipei Times editorial on Xi Jiatun, it confirms he knew Martin Lee and Szeto Wah who both founded what is now the Hong Kong Democratic Party
    http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2016/08/01/2003652206/1

    1. ‘Martin Lee (李柱銘), one of the founders of Hong Kong’s Democratic Party, met with Xu several times during Xu’s tenure at Xinhua, Lee said in an interview.’

    2. Carrie Lam’s Predecessor (C Y Leung or Leung Chun Ying) is also a Chinese Communist Party member and most of the Hong Kong Chief Executives of the Hong Kong Government are known to be members of the Chinese Communist Party or are loyalists to the Chinese Communist Party hence they are allowed to work in the position as the Hong Kong Chief Executive of the Government:

    “But now when you look at Hong Kong, I think that they are running this place. Our chief executive is one of them, a secret Communist Party cadre, obviously,” he said, referring to Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英).

    3. ‘Xu encouraged Lee, a lawyer, and Szeto Wah (司徒華), a union organizer, to set up political parties, Lee said.’

    4. ‘In Hong Kong, Xu wrote a letter to Deng, in care of Xinhua in Hong Kong, promising he would not reveal any secrets.’

    • TroubledEuropean

      I will also mention Szeto Wah who died in 2011, is also another Chinese Communist Party Collaborator. He is the founder of the biggest Teacher’s Union in Hong Kong which is known as the Hong Kong Professional Teacher’s Union. The Hong Kong Professional Teacher’s Union has actually faced allegations in Hong Kong that it is brainwashing students.

      https://badcanto.wordpress.com/2015/05/29/hong-kongs-chairman-mao-szeto-wah/

      In his biography Szeto Wah admitted he had ties with the Chinese Communist Party

      Szeto Wah, the key figure of United Democrats of Hong Kong and Democratic Party, established Hong Kong Professional Teachers’ Union (HKPTU) and Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements in China (HKASPDMC), and he disguised as a freedom fighter all along, deceiving millions of Hongkongers for over 20 years. Not until his death did he admit his close ties with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in his autobiography. His younger brother Szeto Keung was vice-director of foreign affairs for Xinhua News Agency.

      Video on the Hong Kong Professional Teacher’s Union and how it helped the Chinese Communist Party turn Hong Kong’s Education System into a Brainwashing system:

      https://www.facebook.com/groups/484793505597441/permalink/599838080759649/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s